Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

New Trust Statement (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter I was eleven in 87
  • Start date Aug 24, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Next
First Prev 5 of 9 Next Last
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #141
Ian1779 said:
Never get behind a takeover from a business prepared to up and move a club for money.
Click to expand...

It would upset quite a few people so for the two reasons stated above. If that's what it's all about we will be the last to hear about it.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #142
Broken Hearted Sky Blue said:
You really are an idealist Northern I admire it. But let's face it anybody with shed loads of money unless a lottery winner has only got it because they're evil bastards
Click to expand...

Probably true, alas.

Even nutters have soft spots though. It's where football's broken though, in that in the old days it was local businessman made good and, OK, they were probably an evil bastard, but they wanted an ego trip and their business, their work was still around the people whose club they owned... so even if they fucked up, they felt *some* kind of responsibility to do right by the club by how they got rid of it.

Don't get even that nowadays!
 
Reactions: Brylowes

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #143
I can't see how anyone but Wasps would want to buy us.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #144
MusicDating said:
I can't see how anyone but Wasps would want to buy us.
Click to expand...

There's always some nutter who thinks they can have a go.

Problem is... those nutters will be just that, complete basket cases, fruit loops, mentalists!
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #145
Whatever happened to Mr. Byng?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #146
Deleted member 5849 said:
Whatever happened to Mr. Byng?
Click to expand...
He discovered the internet, probably realised there's lots of porn and gone awol
 
Reactions: chiefdave and Ian1779

Bruce the Boot

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #147
Nick said:
He discovered the internet, probably realised there's lots of porn and gone awol
Click to expand...

You speaking from experience ?
 

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #148
Deleted member 5849 said:
There's always some nutter who thinks they can have a go.

Problem is... those nutters will be just that, complete basket cases, fruit loops, mentalists!
Click to expand...

It'd have to be a ruthless group who think they can make a quick buck by a promotion, maybe fronted by an ex-pro who's sold the deal to them. Oh, wait.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #149
Bruce the Boot said:
You speaking from experience ?
Click to expand...
No I can multi task
 

Bruce the Boot

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #150
Im sure you can bud left or right handed
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #151
I guess been owned by Wasps would be nearly as bad as SISU.
Only slightly better as they have the ground and seem a bit slicker with their business actions .
Morals no different I would say.
Also would shaft us if they needed to.
Never less we would still be better off than we are now.
OSB has said financially they wouldn't do it though
 
Reactions: Ian1779, stupot07, Limey and 1 other person
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #152
dongonzalos said:
I guess been owned by Wasps would be nearly as bad as SISU.
Only slightly better as they have the ground and seem a bit slicker with their business actions .
Morals no different I would say.
Also would shaft us if they needed to.
Click to expand...

You get a rough deal on this board
 
Reactions: Brylowes and dongonzalos

Bruce the Boot

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #153
Deleted member 5849 said:
You get a rough deal on this board
Click to expand...

PMSL !
 
G

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #154
problem CCFC
cause - effect - solution
effect - the disappearance of a proud football club
cause - megalomania by all parties
solution - remove the facet of greed
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #155
Ian1779 said:
I'm not happy with SISU. If we are to have new owners great.... I don't want them to be Wasps. Would you??
Click to expand...
I would welcome just about anyone, with the setup and current ownership I honestly
Can't see anything other than our demise.
 
L

Limey

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #156
The club needs to be reunited with the Ricoh plus all associated revenue. Appears this will only happen under wasps owners.

Fan ownership whilst a nice thought is no good under current rental set up. We'd be resigned to league one (or two) as with sisu.

Wasps are never going to move out (unfortunately) and laughable thought they would ever try to relocate ccfc.
Maybe wasps ownership is best shot we have of ever rising up the league's again.

I would still never set foot in Ricoh to watch wasps though.

Why would wasps owners want us? Safety net in case the wasps project fails or to cement local bond/support for wasps too? No idea really.
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #157
No reason why any well heeled smart owner of ccfc couldn't negotiate a bloody good deal re the Ricoh, could buy shares even. The club have never owned the Ricoh, only ever paid rent.
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #158
Limey said:
The club needs to be reunited with the Ricoh plus all associated revenue. Appears this will only happen under wasps owners.

Fan ownership whilst a nice thought is no good under current rental set up. We'd be resigned to league one (or two) as with sisu.

Wasps are never going to move out (unfortunately) and laughable thought they would ever try to relocate ccfc.
Maybe wasps ownership is best shot we have of ever rising up the league's again.

I would still never set foot in Ricoh to watch wasps though.

Why would wasps owners want us? Safety net in case the wasps project fails or to cement local bond/support for wasps too? No idea really.
Click to expand...
Or because there's far more money to be made from football than there will
Ever be from rugby.
Think it was Otis bought this up a while back, what if Wasps bought the stadium
Under the guise of rugby but always looking at CCFC as the main event.
Stranger things have happened.
 
Reactions: Earlsdon_Skyblue1, dongonzalos and Limey

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #159
Brylowes said:
Or because there's far more money to be made from football than there will
Ever be from rugby.
Think it was Otis bought this up a while back, what if Wasps bought the stadium
Under the guise of rugby but always looking at CCFC as the main event.
Stranger things have happened.
Click to expand...
They went a bit extreme as a back story then
 
Reactions: Ian1779, dongonzalos and Deleted member 5849
L

Limey

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #160
Rugby plus football maximises the yearly use of the Ricoh which is desirable of course for any owner.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #161
Broken Hearted Sky Blue said:
It's not an issue for me if someone is out to buy us then I don't think it would be wasps anyway.
Click to expand...
I agree. They don't have tbr money, football clubs are money pits and the risk will impact on the bonds, it also goes against their aim of being the biggest and most successful rugby club in Europe. It ain't happening.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: singers_pore
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #162
rupert_bear said:
No reason why any well heeled smart owner of ccfc couldn't negotiate a bloody good deal re the Ricoh, could buy shares even. The club have never owned the Ricoh, only ever paid rent.
Click to expand...

Why would Wasps sell shares in their ground?

Why would Wasps do a deal that didn't maximise *their* profit?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #163
rupert_bear said:
No reason why any well heeled smart owner of ccfc couldn't negotiate a bloody good deal re the Ricoh, could buy shares even. The club have never owned the Ricoh, only ever paid rent......
Click to expand...

.....and only ever struggled in it under the matchday only rental no access to additional matchday and other income...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #164
Deleted member 5849 said:
Why would Wasps sell shares in their ground?

Why would Wasps do a deal that didn't maximise *their* profit?
Click to expand...
They also can't because the bond holders own the ground.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #165
Deleted member 5849 said:
Why would Wasps sell shares in their ground?

Why would Wasps do a deal that didn't maximise *their* profit?
Click to expand...
That's down to negotiation isn't it, money talks. These statements constantly put about on here that we, ccfc, aren't an attractive bet because "we" don't own a ground I think frankly is rubbish, a decent proper owner could easily get a deal.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #166
rupert_bear said:
That's down to negotiation isn't it, money talks. These statements constantly put about on here that we, ccfc, aren't an attractive bet because "we" don't own a ground I think frankly is rubbish, a decent proper owner could easily get a deal.
Click to expand...
Why would Wasps sell shares in their ground?

Why would Wasps do a deal that didn't maximise *their* profit?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #167
rupert_bear said:
That's down to negotiation isn't it, money talks. These statements constantly put about on here that we, ccfc, aren't an attractive bet because "we" don't own a ground I think frankly is rubbish, a decent proper owner could easily get a deal.
Click to expand...
I'm sure they could easily get a deal if they are prepared to pay what wasps want us to pay. Wasps need the money to pay the interest and bonds, they don't make much from the f&b and car parking from our games, so the only way to make money from us is much higher rent.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #168
italiahorse said:
It will be done by stealth. It will be Sisu's fault and it will be worth nothing when it's handed over.
Click to expand...
Nick said:
Hardly stealth if they told you...

Our club is being distressed then, and the trust are on board????
Click to expand...

So lets get this straight Italia not only are our shite owners distressing us, but we are also being distressed by Wasps so they can get their grubby little hands on the club, as in your words its all about the money.

It really shows how shallow you are that you would support someone as bad as our current owners to be our new owners, and what a hypocrite you are that you bad mouth SISU and yet positively fawn over Wasps. They are both evils, in respect of ownership.
 
Last edited: Aug 24, 2016
Reactions: stupot07 and Covstu

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #169
rupert_bear said:
That's down to negotiation isn't it, money talks. These statements constantly put about on here that we, ccfc, aren't an attractive bet because "we" don't own a ground I think frankly is rubbish, a decent proper owner could easily get a deal.
Click to expand...
And of course if Wasps took us on, we would then own our own ground.
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2016
  • #170
Nick said:
They went a bit extreme as a back story then
Click to expand...
Standard business practice
 

singers_pore

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2016
  • #171
stupot07 said:
They also can't because the bond holders own the ground.
Click to expand...
The bondholders do not own the ground. The lease was simply used as collateral. And the lease was valued at 45m IIRC, which is utterly laughable.
 
Reactions: stupot07
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2016
  • #172
Brylowes said:
And of course if Wasps took us on, we would then own our own ground.
Click to expand...
We, the football club, have never owned our ground, the Ricoh that is, just owning 10% would be an improvement
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2016
  • #173
For me it makes no logical sense for this to happen, you would understand if acquiring ccfc meant the stadium and the academy grounds but they have already taken both of them from us without a fight so what is the true value of ccfc to them from a commercial sense? They would absorb a debt ridden club in the third tier of English football with a fractured fan base and little assets on the pitch. Where would revenue go, they would have an uncomfortable split between rugby and football which defies logic.

If their plan was to distress the club to the stage of nothingness to acquire us then they are as bad if not worse than our current owners and the club will be selling its soul to the devil. Still we would have sets of fans coming back as wasps will our saviours and people will be sucking up the media spin on this.
 
Reactions: Moff and stupot07

albatross

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2016
  • #174
Ian1779 said:
The Trust want the club to negotiate with parties to secure future of academy and stadium - sensible suggestion. But in the same breath they won't align themselves with the club which surely is the most obvious of things to do. It comes across as contradictory.
Click to expand...

So are you saying that CCFC and SISU are the same entity, Back one , back the other?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 25, 2016
  • #175
Covstu said:
For me it makes no logical sense for this to happen, you would understand if acquiring ccfc meant the stadium and the academy grounds but they have already taken both of them from us without a fight so what is the true value of ccfc to them from a commercial sense? They would absorb a debt ridden club in the third tier of English football with a fractured fan base and little assets on the pitch. Where would revenue go, they would have an uncomfortable split between rugby and football which defies logic.

If their plan was to distress the club to the stage of nothingness to acquire us then they are as bad if not worse than our current owners and the club will be selling its soul to the devil. Still we would have sets of fans coming back as wasps will our saviours and people will be sucking up the media spin on this.
Click to expand...
Pretty much, it seems ok for wasps to do this to ccfc
 
Reactions: Covstu
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Next
First Prev 5 of 9 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?