Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
At this stage of the season and WITH the Football League soon to discuss us, please can I request no more references to 'point taken' (especially 10)
It would actually be more like 500k but point taken.
So you would negotiate with your previous lodger who owed you money for renting a room in your house whilst he is taking you to court in an attempt to get your house because you remortgaged. I admire your forgiving nature.
Would you drop what is effectively your most potent bargaining chip?
Yes, because those negotiations might include an agreement that said court action stops.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
A 'New Statement' that says nothing new.
Can you see the difference:
1. We have moved on, there is no deal to be done, we would only return as owners.
2. We are willing to talk about a rental deal, let's start the process of reconciliation, we have a proposal.
Nothing new?
A 'New Statement' that says nothing new.
Can you see the difference:
1. We have moved on, there is no deal to be done, we would only return as owners.
2. We are willing to talk about a rental deal, let's start the process of reconciliation, we have a proposal.
Nothing new?
i understand you here but ....
can you see the diff between
1..We are willing to talk about a rental deal, let's start the process of reconciliation, we have a proposal.
Nothing new
2.. we will announce our new stadium plans in three weeks
these people are full of shit
i understand you here but ....
can you see the diff between
1..We are willing to talk about a rental deal, let's start the process of reconciliation, we have a proposal.
Nothing new
2.. we will announce our new stadium plans in three weeks
these people are full of shit
Yes I can and yes they are. What they also are is on the back foot and increasingly desperate. Whatever your viewpoint, these last 2 statements are very new indeed.
A 'New Statement' that says nothing new.
Can you see the difference:
1. We have moved on, there is no deal to be done, we would only return as owners.
2. We are willing to talk about a rental deal, let's start the process of reconciliation, we have a proposal.
Nothing new?
depends on whether you believe what they say.
Me? I wouldn't trust a word they say.
Actions not words.
ACL won't talk until the ,fl agreed ,money is paid and the JR is dropped .
SISU release a statement saying they are not going to pay the money yet and will not drop the JR. Cue everyone to jump up and down and Sing "We're coming home"
We're being played
But SISU have had some guys working a plan while the rest of their staff work on turning over the JR. Classic divergence tactics . One day they'll be straight .
Then again perhaps not
Over and Over again sisu mislead and try to make it look like the fault is with someone else and over and over again a huge number of people fall for it and get all excited. There isn't anything positive about this statement.
Also why was this statement a few hours ago written by Joy Seppala and Tim Fisher and now only written by Tim Fisher? thats a bit weird isn't it? why would they change the statement like that?
depends on whether you believe what they say.
Me? I wouldn't trust a word they say.
Actions not words.
So... You are saying that the reason it says nothing new is because you don't believe a word they say anyway, is that right?
I seem to see this in a different way to everyone else.
The crown jewels have been sold. They have been replaced on the cheap. They might have done well. We will have to wait and see. But will anyone be worth millions next year to sell? Have the investors had enough of putting money into our club?
It looks like SISU have massive legal bills to pay. Hardly any income. Are they trying to move back to the Ricoh to increase their income massively whilst using the money to continue the litigation? And if it fails hope that some of us will blame ACL for our club not coming home.
Have SISU paid directly ACL £590k = NO. (Stalling tactic putting it in an ecrow account. FL advised to PAY ACL by 31/05/2014)
Have SISU dropped legals = NO.
Until both are a YES then the statement today is irelevant.
Have SISU paid directly ACL £590k = NO. (Stalling tactic putting it in an ecrow account. FL advised to PAY ACL by 31/05/2014)
Have SISU dropped legals = NO.
Until both are a YES then the statement today is irelevant.
SISU said they would NEVER rent again. Whats changed Joy?
I guess NOPM has had to much of a hit on their finances. Northampton was a SISU disaster.
They just dont fancy it for another season. I wonder why? £.
ACL won't talk until the ,fl agreed ,money is paid and the JR is dropped .
SISU release a statement saying they are not going to pay the money yet
Anyone noticed how the statement was originally signed off by Tim Fisher and Joy Seppalla. Seems to have been altered to now just say Tim Fisher. Seems Seppalla may be distancing herself from the statement! Also it has now been shunted right off the homepage completely by admittedly tonights match report and some other stuff.
Over and Over again sisu mislead and try to make it look like the fault is with someone else and over and over again a huge number of people fall for it and get all excited. There isn't anything positive about this statement.
Also why was this statement a few hours ago written by Joy Seppala and Tim Fisher and now only written by Tim Fisher? thats a bit weird isn't it? why would they change the statement like that?
What an excellent observation junglej13, and also to Noggin. That's true media manipulation and / or Timmy's just had one almighty bollocking! If SISU / Otium were upright and professional would this type of thing happen? No. If Timmy and Joy weren't devious FW's would it happen? No. Should we take one word from the letter as anything other than Spin and Propaganda? No feckin way.
If the above is not true expect Timmy to apologise to his boss and the fans tomorrow for being at worst deliberately misleading and at best a total twat.
Don't know if the original statement contained this current line:
I will continue to meet fans and clearly explain the club's position.
If so, I doubt Joy would want to make herself available directly to fans. Perhaps this is why her name's been dropped ... though the image of Tim being carpeted by a whip wielding blonde in a rubber outfit does spring to mind.
She's met fans what are you on about?
absolute rubbish! It was only a few weeks ago that we knew what she looked like!She's met fans what are you on about?
absolute rubbish! It was only a few weeks ago that we knew what she looked like!
absolute rubbish! It was only a few weeks ago that we knew what she looked like!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?