D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
You still haven't said who has contributed more than Eccles this season.
You still haven't said who has contributed more than Eccles this season.Just to refer back to our debate, I’m not putting the blame solely on him, I’m not blaming him for us being bad, I just don’t rate him as a player. He has to play atm as that’s all we have in that position (apart from maybe Lati) but I don’t blame him for us doing bad, there’s a number of factors why we’re so shit atm.
All got our opinions I suppose, mine’s that Eccles is alright but nothing special. None of this matters one jot anyway as we’ve unfortunately got him playing defensive mid for the foreseeable future.Absolute rubbish
Not sure if you missed it like 3 times but I said Sakamoto. In fact you even tried to make a joke about it earlier so you must have acknowledged it. Pound for pound, minute for minute, Saka has shown more willing to get forward and contribute more than Eccles has. I realise they’re different jobs but I simply don’t rate Eccles, you do rate Eccles and that’s basically end of story, we’re never going to come to an agreement so I’m happy just to leave it there tbh.You still haven't said who has contributed more than Eccles this season.
Eccles is a good squad player who’s having way too much asked of him because of the club’s failure to recruit in midfield. Likewise Sheaf who is being panned for playing poorly has been brought back early because we’re desperate.Not sure if you missed it like 3 times but I said Sakamoto. In fact you even tried to make a joke about it earlier so you must have acknowledged it. Pound for pound, minute for minute, Saka has shown more willing to get forward and contribute more than Eccles has. I realise they’re different jobs but I simply don’t rate Eccles, you do rate Eccles and that’s basically end of story, we’re never going to come to an agreement so I’m happy just to leave it there tbh.
Talking about Josh Eccles all night is just draining tbh.
So Sakamoto who couldn't even maintain a place in the team in his favoured position when vanEwijk was injured has been our best player and has contributed more than anyone so far.Not sure if you missed it like 3 times but I said Sakamoto. In fact you even tried to make a joke about it earlier so you must have acknowledged it. Pound for pound, minute for minute, Saka has shown more willing to get forward and contribute more than Eccles has. I realise they’re different jobs but I simply don’t rate Eccles, you do rate Eccles and that’s basically end of story, we’re never going to come to an agreement so I’m happy just to leave it there tbh.
Talking about Josh Eccles all night is just draining tbh.
So Sakamoto who couldn't even maintain a place in the team in his favoured position when vanEwijk was injured has been our best player and has contributed more than anyone so far.
I am not against Sakamoto and hope he goes on to fulfil his potential btw. He has some real talent but he has not done much so far.
Really you can't be arguing he has achieved more than anyone else so far?
Surely it depends on what position needs filling as to who you'd pick.I realise Saka and Eccles do completely different jobs but my personal opinion is if I had to have one I’d pick Saka over Eccles every time. That’s just me though, many others will disagree and that’s fine, that’s football and it’s all part of the game I suppose.
While I think stats are extremely useful, it also needs to be remembered they can be flawed as by their nature they are best for measuring very specific aspects rather than a bigger picture. Sometimes the methodology is flawed and sometimes they are set out with a deliberate bias to support a particular position.People who hate stats hate them because they don't back up their prejudices or flawed observations.
While I think stats are extremely useful, it also needs to be remembered they can be flawed as by their nature they are best for measuring very specific aspects rather than a bigger picture. Sometimes the methodology is flawed and sometimes they are set out with a deliberate bias to support a particular position.
Like with history, sources can be misleading or inaccurate but that doesn't mean you ignore them because of it, you just have to factor that possibility in and look for more sources to try and get a better overall picture.
So really what is needed is loads of stats and working how to improve those that are poor without affecting those that are good too much.
Can you tell me what they class as a shot as I never seem to agree with the game stats atcthe endNobody outperforms or underperforms the xG forever, that's the benefit of it. You can lose a match and be unlucky. You can lose 3 matches and be unlucky, but eventually, those balance out given long enough.
It is like playing roulette in a casino, the house might lose on 5 spins - but there is success if they don't panic and change the rules when stats say eventually they win.
It gives a better understanding of longer-term patterns because we are all wildly biased when we look at matches. This is the fundamental principle behind Brentford and Brighton, that we all have wild bias and that stats help you to unpick them.
For example, it is no surprise that Brighton have a dearth of Ecuadorian talent - stats showed it was an underpenetrated scouting pool, producing higher quality prospects than people would expect. They go in and find cheap prospects before anybody else, Caicedo, Sarmiento and Estupinan.
If you look at Brentford and the way they play football, they rarely take shots unless they are in a high xG location, and they consistently look to play the ball into those locations. Thomas Frank takes substitution advice from a team of analysts who show the underlying analytics and make suggestions based on them.
Sent from my SM-S911B using Tapatalk
While I think stats are extremely useful, it also needs to be remembered they can be flawed as by their nature they are best for measuring very specific aspects rather than a bigger picture. Sometimes the methodology is flawed and sometimes they are set out with a deliberate bias to support a particular position.
Like with history, sources can be misleading or inaccurate but that doesn't mean you ignore them because of it, you just have to factor that possibility in and look for more sources to try and get a better overall picture.
So really what is needed is loads of stats and working how to improve those that are poor without affecting those that are good too much.
I did post some stats that showed Allen was better than Hamer. Nice to see so many agreeing...Exactly. I bet if people checked hamers stats when he was playing a little deeper (before last 2-3 months) they wouldn’t have been great. He was always trying progressive passes, some would work, some wouldn’t, leading to a lower pass completion than many who will just take the easy option and pass it back and sideways. The ones that did work probably weren’t ‘assists’ as they were coming from deeper but may have opened up an easy assist for another player.
Let me introduce you to Key Passes and xA.Exactly. I bet if people checked hamers stats when he was playing a little deeper (before last 3-4 months) they wouldn’t have been great. He was always trying progressive passes, some would work, some wouldn’t, leading to a lower pass completion than many who will just take the easy option and pass it back and sideways. The ones that did work probably weren’t ‘assists’ as they were coming from deeper but may have opened up an easy assist for another player.
Also what about the players who have set up our 19+ big missed chances who will be missing out on assists through no fault of their own.
People expecting too much too soon on the back of last season.This isnt a Robins out post
But what I will say is, for the first time in his tenure, I genuinely believe he hasnt got a fucking clue how to resolve this and seems lost
Yet the data is used by practically every professional club. Someone should tell them.
Arguably two of the best ran clubs in the PL, Brentford and Brighton use stats to find players no one has heard of that turn out to be pretty decent. In fact, Brighton’s success has been largely down to being ahead of the rest of the PL when using stat metrics to find players.
I think some have been blindsided a bit by Sakamoto's trickery. So far though he's had no end product. Much of his crossing has been poor.
I can see why people like him, because he looks exciting when he's on the ball. But he needs to produce. No use beating 3 defenders and then delivering a bad cross.
I think he may be one for the future to be honest. Not been convinced by him yet. He's a bit all mouth and no trousers at the moment.
I think some have been blindsided a bit by Sakamoto's trickery. So far though he's had no end product. Much of his crossing has been poor.
I can see why people like him, because he looks exciting when he's on the ball. But he needs to produce. No use beating 3 defenders and then delivering a bad cross.
I think he may be one for the future to be honest. Not been convinced by him yet. He's a bit all mouth and no trousers at the moment.
He’s 27 so he’s not one for the future.I think some have been blindsided a bit by Sakamoto's trickery. So far though he's had no end product. Much of his crossing has been poor.
I can see why people like him, because he looks exciting when he's on the ball. But he needs to produce. No use beating 3 defenders and then delivering a bad cross.
I think he may be one for the future to be honest. Not been convinced by him yet. He's a bit all mouth and no trousers at the moment.
I didn't realise he was 27.He’s 27 so he’s not one for the future.
In a team where no one is really producing any end product he looks one of the closest to doing so. Body language and effort looks much better than some as well.
Yeah, I get all that. I like him. I was expecting a bit more from him though in creating opportunity for others. He gets in great positions and beats his man, but then hardly anything comes from it.He’s 27 so he’s not one for the future.
In a team where no one is really producing any end product he looks one of the closest to doing so. Body language and effort looks much better than some as well.
Neither did I until the club posted about his birthday the other week to be fair! Did surprise me a bit, there’s not much chance of turning a profit on him.I didn't realise he was 27.
My hope is he’s suffering from constant player/shape changes in offensive areas which makes it difficult to build understanding with where his teammates will be.Yeah, I get all that. I like him. I was expecting a bit more from him though in creating opportunity for others. He gets in great positions and beats his man, but then hardly anything comes from it.
I am hoping that is still him learning the game over here and how we play
according to his stats he's 103You are new to football if you say that though. So pipe down.
Adi can still be on the touchline, just not at the same time as MR.Not having a Adi in the technical area to dish out instructions is causing Robins issues as well I think. He’s lost the main voice on the touch line for game management.
So then the issue is finding out which stats/metrics they're using, because it must be different to other teams with far larger resources and scouting.Arguably two of the best ran clubs in the PL, Brentford and Brighton use stats to find players no one has heard of that turn out to be pretty decent. In fact, Brighton’s success has been largely down to being ahead of the rest of the PL when using stat metrics to find players.
He’s 27 so he’s not one for the future.
In a team where no one is really producing any end product he looks one of the closest to doing so. Body language and effort looks much better than some as well.
I may start using that on my dating profile.Lots of Japanese footballers go through university and don’t start playing professional until their early 20s, so in “football years” he’s 24-25
I think some have been blindsided a bit by Sakamoto's trickery. So far though he's had no end product. Much of his crossing has been poor.
I can see why people like him, because he looks exciting when he's on the ball. But he needs to produce. No use beating 3 defenders and then delivering a bad cross.
I think he may be one for the future to be honest. Not been convinced by him yet. He's a bit all mouth and no trousers at the moment.
Hopefully he still has a future though!I didn't realise he was 27.
Completely agree. Tony Bloom made his fortune using statistics in betting, and has is own company which help with Brighton. As I said, they are ahead of the game. What metrics they use is anyone’s guess and I imagine they’ll be doing everything they can to keep it under wraps.So then the issue is finding out which stats/metrics they're using, because it must be different to other teams with far larger resources and scouting.
It's all very well saying 'use stats', but you've got to use the right ones. Brentford and Brighton clearly are right now.
Completely agree. Tony Bloom made his fortune using statistics in betting, and has is own company which help with Brighton. As I said, they are ahead of the game. What metrics they use is anyone’s guess and I imagine they’ll be doing everything they can to keep it under wraps.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?