Number of white people arrested for terror offences outstrip any other single ethnic group, new figures show
Very interesting especially in the light of the two 15 year olds today
Can’t be right. White terrorists aren’t terrorists they’re mentally ill.
Terrorism and mental illness aren't mutually exclusiveCan’t be right. White terrorists aren’t terrorists they’re mentally ill.
White suspects accounted for 38 per cent of terror-related arrests, followed by those of Asian appearance on 37 per cent and black suspects on 9 per cent.
The most recent Census in 2011 highlights that in England and Wales, 80 per cent of the population were white British. Asian (Pakistani, Indian, Bangladeshi, other) ‘groups’ made up 6.8 per cent of the population; black groups 3.4 per cent; Chinese groups 0.7 per cent; Arab groups 0.4 per cent and other groups 0.6 per cent.
Indeed . If the number of attacks increases the police will be rounding up millions of "potential" terrorists.Note the phrase potential terrorist as opposed to actual terrorist who has committed violence.
Would be interesting to see an up to date census.The numbers are meaningless, you need to go off percentages and compare to the make up of the population.
I do trust a census to be honest. It's the consensus I always feel might be just a little bit dodgy.Would be interesting to see an up to date census.
You'll have to wait for 2021 to get that.Would be interesting to see an up to date census.
Number of white people arrested for terror offences outstrip any other single ethnic group, new figures show
Very interesting especially in the light of the two 15 year olds today
In the sun as well
The independent , ironically 50% Saudi owned .
Shock horror lol
In the sun as well
The numbers are meaningless, you need to go off percentages and compare to the make up of the population.
Lol that last paragraph , my word there is literally no hopePercentages are only interesting if you want to know if white people are more likely to be terrorists (they aren’t). Which is interesting for social scientists.
Absolute numbers tell you the bigger threat to the country, which is probably more interesting to the security services.
So no point racially profiling white people, but should probably put more resource into far right British terror than far right Islamic terror.
It’s the same ideology anyway. Britain First et al and ISIS are just two sides of the same coin.
This has me worried. I am going to think I am walking past a terrorist every time I see a white person.Number of white people arrested for terror offences outstrip any other single ethnic group, new figures show
Very interesting especially in the light of the two 15 year olds today
Percentages are only interesting if you want to know if white people are more likely to be terrorists (they aren’t). Which is interesting for social scientists.
Absolute numbers tell you the bigger threat to the country, which is probably more interesting to the security services.
So no point racially profiling white people, but should probably put more resource into far right British terror than far right Islamic terror.
It’s the same ideology anyway. Britain First et al and ISIS are just two sides of the same coin.
And the 23,000 figure is an estimate (considered on the low side) of islamist terror suspects that are considered a serious threat, the true figure would be massive if they added in people who agree with the ideology.It’s truly a bizarre theory.
So Britain First - a rag tag organisation of less than 1,000 is more of a threat than an organisation that trains people in terror, has committed more deaths in one incident than any other organisation has in totality and according to our own intelligence services has 23,000 potential suspects wandering around the uk.
The comment on absolutes versus percentages is mind boggling. Percentages are obviously more relevant in stop and search as even these statistics show it’s around 4000% more likely a Muslim is carrying a bomb than a white person
Amazing really
Indeed a scary thoughtAnd the 23,000 figure is an estimate (considered on the low side) of islamist terror suspects that are considered a serious threat, the true figure would be massive if they added in people who agree with the ideology.
This hyperbolic diatribe, orchestrated by a bunch of self loathing middle class apologists, has no basis in reality, rather a basis in their agenda driven, somewhat schizophrenic, p.c ideology.Number of white people arrested for terror offences outstrip any other single ethnic group, new figures show
Very interesting especially in the light of the two 15 year olds today
The Independent is the young, naive, and self-hating version of Daily Mail.
It amazes me how many young and entitled people can say others are being brainwashed when this 'paper' is doing exactly the same to them.
There was an article on BBC today trying to make it sound like it was false to say Mohammed was the most popular baby name in the UK. In the end it turns out that it is, but you'd only know that if you find where they have hidden away that you have to incorporate different spellings...
Why do the press twist everything, and why are people so stupid?
The Independent is the young, naive, and self-hating version of Daily Mail.
It amazes me how many young and entitled people can say others are being brainwashed when this 'paper' is doing exactly the same to them.
There was an article on BBC today trying to make it sound like it was false to say Mohammed was the most popular baby name in the UK. In the end it turns out that it is, but you'd only know that if you find where they have hidden away that you have to incorporate different spellings...
Why do the press twist everything, and why are people so stupid?[/QUOTE]
Won't be in 20 years. Mohammed the most popular newborns name in EnglandWho'd have thought it in a country that is 87% white
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?