Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

More News On Ricoh Train Station (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter guicey15
  • Start date Sep 28, 2011
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 12
Next
First Prev 2 of 12 Next Last

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #36
chiefdave said:
The lack of an increase from one train an hour was farcical to start off with but the ban on matchday use seems more to do with our old friends the Safety Advisory Group than the train operator, those sensible chaps that make away fans sit about 5 blocks away from home fans.



Have a guess who leads the Safety Advisory Group.

Its a farce, where else could you have a train station built next to a stadium and trains not be allowed to stop on matchday. There was even a crowd control queuing system install for use on matchday, what a waste of time and money.
Click to expand...

Do the council lead them?
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #37
chiefdave said:
From the original proposal, which was the basis for funding being awarded:
Click to expand...

'up to'
'could'

'we understand'
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #38
chiefdave said:
Wonder if Lucas will be as keen to take credit now as she was when work started on the station.

View attachment 4559

From the Telegraph report at the time the work started:
Click to expand...

Wearing sandals on a construction site?? If ever there had been an opportunity to fire the useless wench that was it.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #39
M&B Stand said:
British Rail weren't the best tho were they!
Click to expand...

At least they owned everything so if a new station opened they'd be able to get hold of actual trains to run it.

The train operating companies can't do that, they only lease trains from bank and investment fund owned companies who the Major government gave all the rolling stock away too. Those companies make enough margin over charging on leases, there is little incentive to invest in new ones.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #40
Ian1779 said:
Wearing sandals on a construction site?? If ever there had been an opportunity to fire the useless wench that was it.
Click to expand...
Safety committee were not picking this one up were they!
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #41
Looks like everyone has been given a NUCKLE sandwich.

Sorry.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #42
Agree it's shite but let's face it, it's another excuse for stay away fans
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #43
chiefdave said:
Wonder if Lucas will be as keen to take credit now as she was when work started on the station.

View attachment 4559

From the Telegraph report at the time the work started:
Click to expand...

She's very naive and shows again that she's out of her depth. It still isn't her (or their) fault.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #44
hill83 said:
'up to'
'could'
'we understand'
Click to expand...

True but I would suggest if you read that document you would have the impression that services would be increased not that the station would be closed on match days.
 

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #45
Few questions:

1) Who funded this project? CCC or Network Rail?
2) If it was for CCC why wasn't the contract negotiated to allow for extra trains to be deployed on match days?
3) Did ACL promise Wasps that a station with extra services would happen?
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #46
fernandopartridge said:
She's very naive and shows again that she's out of her depth. It still isn't her (or their) fault.
Click to expand...
But isn't this like building a massive stadium with no one to attend? Surely scoped this our prior to building!
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #47
chiefdave said:
True but I would suggest if you read that document you would have the impression that services would be increased not that the station would be closed on match days.
Click to expand...

Maybe so, but it turns out it was false. Massive shame.
 

M&B Stand

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #48
hill83 said:
Looks like everyone has been given a NUCKLE sandwich.

Sorry.
Click to expand...

The project has hit the buffers.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #49
M&B Stand said:
The project has hit the buffers.
Click to expand...

It's gone off the rails
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #50
Sterling Archer said:
£13m well spent.

It's like something out of 'on the hour':
"Council builds train station to , Council tells people who want to go to not to use it."

What a farce.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

How many passenger journeys a week will this line normally carry, I estimate 10,000 at £5 a pop, that will take something like 10 years to pay back the capital cost.

The running costs will probably take another 10 years. Economic madness innit!

I found this report, reads like someone wrote it with no intention of proving anything, just justifying expenditure.
http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse...ltation responses/c/coventry city council.pdf
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #51
chiefdave said:
The lack of an increase from one train an hour was farcical to start off with but the ban on matchday use seems more to do with our old friends the Safety Advisory Group than the train operator, those sensible chaps that make away fans sit about 5 blocks away from home fans.

Have a guess who leads the Safety Advisory Group.

Its a farce, where else could you have a train station built next to a stadium and trains not be allowed to stop on matchday. There was even a crowd control queuing system install for use on matchday, what a waste of time and money.
Click to expand...

It's Barry Butterworth at CCC. Given the timetable and the train being used it's probably the correct decision. May as well not bother at all on a matchday if you can only take 75 people from the ground after FT. SAG have got things badly wrong in the past but what else could they do on this? It'd end up being like a train to Central Bombay.

chiefdave said:
Wonder if Lucas will be as keen to take credit now as she was when work started on the station.

View attachment 4559

From the Telegraph report at the time the work started:
Click to expand...

Clearly it was either wrongly reported in the first place (unlikely as there was never a retraction) or those responsible for providing the stock and timetables have not delivered.

Something we have to ask of CCC is when did they find this out? Was it a case of being told one thing at the start but now it's opening this news has dropped in their laps or have they known for some time and not bothered to try to challenge the decision? If it's the first one fair enough. If it's the second then they to are at fault. Especially as they own it!

One explanation that would be half acceptable would be that those responsible were basing matchday use on 20k+ crowds in the Championship. However that doesn't quite work as Wasps could potentially average somewhere close to that (and did last season).
 
Last edited: Aug 25, 2015
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #52
Am I reading this correctly? Millions has been spent to put a train station at the Ricoh arena and to not use it on match days and 1 carriage an hour? And waiting times 1-2 hours after a match has finished?
 

M&B Stand

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #53
hill83 said:
It's gone off the rails
Click to expand...

Looks like the end of the line
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #54
M&B Stand said:
Looks like the end of the line
Click to expand...

Looks like it's ran out of steam
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #55
skyblue1991 said:
Who funded this project? CCC or Network Rail?
Click to expand...

Not entirely sure but found this:

The new Coventry Arena station should be complete in spring next year.
It will form part of a seven-figure upgrade programme which will also see a new station built at Bermuda Park and improvements at Coventry and Bedworth stations.

Grant funding of up to £4.75million has been received from The Department for Transport towards the scheme.
Further European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) grant funding has a been secured in addition to strengthen the viability of the NUCKLE rail project.
Click to expand...
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #56
hill83 said:
Looks like it's ran out of steam
Click to expand...

Don't lose track from the debate.
 
A

armybike

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #57
The train providers are at fault here for not getting the logistics in place for the services required/promised.



The funding has been put in place for the necessary structure to be built and the line has also been upgraded as part of the NUCKLE.
 
S

SonofErnie

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #58
This is an absolute scandal and should result in heads rolling. At best incompetence, at worst corruption. This actually makes me want SISU to win their case against the council!
 
M

malkitccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #59
Kingokings204 said:
Don't lose track from the debate.
Click to expand...

That was First Class.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #60
CJ_covblaze said:
It's Barry Butterworth at CCC. Given the timetable and the train being used it's probably the correct decision. May as well not bother at all on a matchday if you can only take 75 people from the ground after FT. SAG have got things badly wrong in the past but what else could they do on this? It'd end up being like a train to Central Bombay.
Click to expand...

For events at Coventry Arena, a shuttle service between Coventry and Coventry Arena stations will be provided, with up to 6-car services operating at a half-hourly frequency to supplement the base half-hourly service (which could also be strengthened to operate with 3-car trains).
Click to expand...

On the basis of this you're looking at close to 2.5K an hour capacity, admittedly that would be commuter level crowding with the carriages bursting at the seams but for a short trip that would be acceptable. Thats not too far short of 25% of our average attendance at present, I would suggest if we had 25% of the crowd arriving by train that would be a pretty high level so what we were promised should be able to cope with events at the Ricoh without any safety concerns.

armybike said:
The train providers are at fault here for not getting the logistics in place for the services required/promised.

The funding has been put in place for the necessary structure to be built and the line has also been upgraded as part of the NUCKLE.
Click to expand...

I don't think its unreasonable to expect that if seven figure grants are being given there is some security that what has been promised is delivered. Surely if you get a grant for something and don't deliver you should have to repay the grant.
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #61
malkitccfc said:
That was First Class.
Click to expand...

Al these jokes are making me catch a cold.

Talk about the green line!
 
S

SonofErnie

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #62
http://www.londonmidland.com/contact-us/contact-us/customer-relations /

We should flood their Customer Relations department with objections to this. An absolute disgrace and farce!
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #63
Seems to me that this is more about rolling stock specification and availability than anything else. The station has clearly been built to cope with the capacity but they don't have either the right train's and/or enough trains available to cope with the capacity of the station during major events at the Ricoh.
 
Last edited: Aug 25, 2015

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #64
Love how the council run the rail network now. The delusion grows.

Hey lads! Maddison was diagnosed in a hospital! Councils part fund some hospitals! Sack Ann Lucas for hobbling Maddison!
 
G

gruffskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #65
Far too much time on my hands!!
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #66
shmmeee said:
Love how the council run the rail network now. The delusion grows.
Click to expand...

Nobody has said the council run the rail network. What has been said is that public money has been given to this scheme on the basis of a level of service which will now not be provided. Would you not expect there to be some sort of safeguard where public money is involved?

Also if you actually read the article the closure of the station on matchdays is nothing to do with Network Rail or London Midland, it is down to the SAG which is led by the council.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #67
skybluetony176 said:
Seems to me that this is more about rolling stock specification and availability than anything else. The station has clearly been built to cope with the capacity but they don't have either the right train's and/or enough trains available to cope with the capacity of the station during major events at the Ricoh.
Click to expand...

You're right. I think most of the network that London Midland use is electrified and therefore they don't have much diesel stock. The NUCKLE line is supposed to electrified at some point but can't see it happening under the current government.

Perhaps a few of the Nuneaton based posters can write to their local Tory MP. Mind, the same could be done for anybody based in Cov too who can write to the Labour ones.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #68
chiefdave said:
Nobody has said the council run the rail network. What has been said is that public money has been given to this scheme on the basis of a level of service which will now not be provided. Would you not expect there to be some sort of safeguard where public money is involved?

Also if you actually read the article the closure of the station on matchdays is nothing to do with Network Rail or London Midland, it is down to the SAG which is led by the council.
Click to expand...

In fairness I don't blame the SAG, huge crowds building up for a maximum of 75 (150 in either direction) spaces on a train is potentially unsafe.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #69
Let's give Pete Waterman a call.
Sure he could find us something.talking of him I wonder If he was st Walsall on Saturday.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2015
  • #70
Sound familiar, isn't it a bit like building an aircraft carrier and not ordering the planes to fly off it.. joined up thinking from government & private contractors both.

Cock ups abound!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 12
Next
First Prev 2 of 12 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?