Honestly couldn't say. I get the impression a lot of Chairmen are on Sisus side. They don't want the precedent set that you can't leave a rent agreement.
I have seen things from other Chairmen who have backed SISU, the FL also back them. Is there some unwritten code going on that makes everybody else see something we can't for them to all side with SISU rather than ACL over it?
Honestly couldn't say. I get the impression a lot of Chairmen are on Sisus side. They don't want the precedent set that you can't leave a rent agreement.
I have seen things from other Chairmen who have backed SISU, the FL also back them. Is there some unwritten code going on that makes everybody else see something we can't for them to all side with SISU rather than ACL over it?
I suspect its the same reason as why Russia and China side with the Syrian government.
Start judging others and you leave yourself open to judgement yourself. Most football owners don't run their clubs sensibly IMO, its just some are worse than others.
I have seen things from other Chairmen who have backed SISU, the FL also back them. Is there some unwritten code going on that makes everybody else see something we can't for them to all side with SISU rather than ACL over it?
It's fairly obvious that clubs owners will stick together in such matters. The FL back them as they're spineless failures as guardians of "real football fans". The alternative would probably have seen them taken to court.
I have seen things from other Chairmen who have backed SISU, the FL also back them. Is there some unwritten code going on that makes everybody else see something we can't for them to all side with SISU rather than ACL over it?