Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Monday Signings (10 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Liquid Gold
  • Start date Jul 31, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last

Senior Vick from Alicante

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #71
You have to trust TM and MV. They will get it right but i think they learnt from the lesson of Januarys transfer window when they took what was available rather than what they wanted. Its no point getting a player thats only as good as what you have you are just treading water if you do. Now most released players are out of contract the agents are going to go in to over time as players will need wages and they will want agents fees so the market situation should free up a bit. The better players will still want to earn but their should be more room to manouver.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #72
smileycov said:
but it doesnt apper that way though, i mean were possibly losing out to the likes of rotherham for christ sake!! if we had similar or better budget why do we keep getting gazumped, thats my only moan!
Click to expand...

Rotherham are in the Championship where you instantly have £5m higher budget and FFP constraints are lesser. We have a similar or better budget compared to most teams in our league but they are signing league one players not aiming for people who have previously been on £26k a week.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #73
smileycov said:
but it doesnt apper that way though, i mean were possibly losing out to the likes of rotherham for christ sake!! if we had similar or better budget why do we keep getting gazumped, thats my only moan!
Click to expand...

You do realise Rotherham are in the league above don't you? Why would be able to have a better budget than them?

It is almost as if people don't really know much and think CCFC are completely seperate.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #74
Liquid Gold said:
Rotherham are in the Championship where you instantly have £5m higher budget and FFP constraints are lesser. We have a similar or better budget compared to most teams in our league but they are signing league one players not aiming for people who have previously been on £26k a week.
Click to expand...
Totally agree that the Championship is realising that some of the prima donners are not worth paying extortionate wages and they are looking for a bunch of fighters/mud wrestlers (1st/2nd div players)to get them up to the premiership just so that they can get the pot of gold for one season so that they can become YOYO clubs and live off the benefits of parachute payments
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #75
Our budget is dictating what we can or cannot bring in, our defence wasn't up to it last year and from what I have seen in pre season its gotten much worse, I am sure TM hasn't just sat on his butt not trying to get people in but if his intended targets want more money etc what can we do?
We let Martin go, which to me was strange because I would have let Ricketts go and keep Martin but obviously TM works with these people day in day out. I must admit I do feel slightly twitchy at the prospect of our defence atm but hopefully now August is here the coffers have a little slack in them and we may see movement of incoming signings. TM got the highest finish in a division for many a season lets hope he can bring more of that...
If we had started badly last season and then finished strong and still achieved the same position I myself would have felt more comfortable with that but he is apparently our best manager for some time so get your asses up there and support the team...remember...plenty of asses on seats mean more money means hopefully better players means promotion (hopefully)
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #76
smileycov said:
but it doesnt apper that way though, i mean were possibly losing out to the likes of rotherham for christ sake!! if we had similar or better budget why do we keep getting gazumped, thats my only moan!
Click to expand...
Our days of being a big club have gone and Rotherham are a league higher. We shouldn't be in a position to compete with Rotherham.

Not unless some rich millionaire buys us.
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #77
luwalla said:
To be fair to TM its clear he wanted to get everything done closed season & go into the new season with his squad ready to go, but he is playing with peanuts money wise!!

It must be bloody hard to get deals over the line when you simply dont have the money to compete or make it finacially attractive for these guys to sign before other clubs come in ... he most likely hasn't seen any Madison money, otherwise im sure we wouldn't be struggling to recruit the way we are.

If we sold vincelot for 50k to free up money to sign ( TM said the day before he was sold that one or two will have to go to allow us to do incoming business ) then that sums up where we are financially - 50k for one of best players!!!
Click to expand...
50k PLUS whatever wages he was on ....
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #78
Liquid Gold said:
Rotherham are in the Championship where you instantly have £5m higher budget and FFP constraints are lesser. We have a similar or better budget compared to most teams in our league but they are signing league one players not aiming for people who have previously been on £26k a week.
Click to expand...

Pretty much sums it up, I'd say Reid is going to be earning more than any of the players Fleetwood have signed...

We are looking at players that are on paper much better than any that Fleetwood or Oldham have signed, that's why Championship teams are interested too.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #79
stevefloyd said:
Our budget is dictating what we can or cannot bring in, our defence wasn't up to it last year and from what I have seen in pre season its gotten much worse, I am sure TM hasn't just sat on his butt not trying to get people in but if his intended targets want more money etc what can we do?
We let Martin go, which to me was strange because I would have let Ricketts go and keep Martin but obviously TM works with these people day in day out. I must admit I do feel slightly twitchy at the prospect of our defence atm but hopefully now August is here the coffers have a little slack in them and we may see movement of incoming signings. TM got the highest finish in a division for many a season lets hope he can bring more of that...
If we had started badly last season and then finished strong and still achieved the same position I myself would have felt more comfortable with that but he is apparently our best manager for some time so get your asses up there and support the team...remember...plenty of asses on seats mean more money means hopefully better players means promotion (hopefully)
Click to expand...

That's the thing, the defence isn't sorted.

Meanwhile we keep getting trialists for positions we don't need them.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #80
Otis said:
Our days of being a big club have gone and Rotherham are a league higher. We shouldn't be in a position to compete with Rotherham.

Not unless some rich millionaire buys us.
Click to expand...

Football testimonial article on the BBC.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36884991

Also gives average salaries in the divisions, 2014-2015.

  • £1.7m Premier League

  • £324k Championship

  • £70k League One

  • £40k League Two
Click to expand...
Frighteningly high, even in our division, really!
 
Reactions: Otis

skyblueelephant76

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #81
People should have a look around at what else is currently happening with League One clubs.

Swindon are in a similar position and still have to bring in a number of players.

Shrewsbury were very active in the transfer market and got stuffed 4-1 in their last friendly.

Northampton have been tipped to do well but lost their last friendly 4-1 to a non-league side and ended up with Aaron Phillips playing centre-back because they have a number of injuries.

Oxford conceded 3 at Barnet with Aaron Martin giving away a penalty.

Gillingham lost 2-0 at Leyton Orient and had one of their summer signings carried off with a broken leg.

Port Vale have assembled a team of foreign players with virtually no League One experience and lost their last friendly 3-0.

I could go on and on. Lots of teams have problems at the moment, I'm still confident that we'll have a much stronger squad in a couple of weeks, it's disappointing that we don't have more players through the door but the lack of emergency loans will mean there is a lot of activity across the leagues until the end of August. Not many teams will have a settled side until that's over.
 
Reactions: Covstar, Skyblueweeman, Moff and 1 other person

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #82
Nick said:
That's the thing, the defence isn't sorted.

Meanwhile we keep getting trialists for positions we don't need them.
Click to expand...

haven't we only had 2 all pre season ?
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #83
But Nick it was late last year when TM pulled a couple of gems on loan, still not sure thats the way to go but if it is so be it.... we need some brute of a defender and someone solid at the side of him to sweep up everything that the brute misses... Who knows what Mowbray and Venus have been looking at...maybe the lad from Brum that someone wrote a glowing report on ...who knows???but fingers crossed...and legs...and arms...and feet...and toes...fuck me I'm in a right mess here now...can't walk
 
Reactions: skybluepm2

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #84
robbiekeane said:
Who's getting on their high horse about it?

I'm not just mindlessly jumping to his defence on everything, it's just innocent until proven guilty isn't it? If we get to the end of the transfer window and he hasn't built a competitive team and we're losing games, then we can start chucking toys out the pram then can't we? Similarly if we get to the end of the season and we miss out on something marginally by a few points and we get battered in the first couple of games and it wasn't worth the risk, then we can question the trade off then can't we?

But instead people are just hellbent on moaning about everything and bitching about not having any funds (even though there's no evidence of that), saying we have a relegation team already, etc etc. Just don't get it. It's likely the guys got a game plan, and is taking calculated risk by keeping the squad thin and going for quality rather than quantity, and accepting that we may have to wait longer to get the best quality.

Ideally we would have bought excellent players at the start of the transfer window, all for significant fees, beating the competition, and have a really long pre season smashing everyone and be ready way in advance. But unfortunately we're a third tier team with about 11k average attendances and no stadium, and so we need to be shrewd with our budget. Unfortunately people can't seem to wrap their little heads around that.
Click to expand...

It just seems like your branding every argument against this years recruitment policy on moaners and the 'sack the board' crew who are angry at the budget. It isn't as simple as that. It's alright being annoyed at people having a go, but I think it's completely plausible for people to be pretty concerned at the shape of the team lining up to face Swindon on Saturday. Innocent until proven guilty is one thing, but if you're loitering at the crime scene, you're only increasing the chances of conviction. Maybe Mowbray is holding out for better players, maybe it will pay off, but at the moment it's pretty clear that a lot of targets have been missed and that the amount of players that have been cut is making the gamble a pretty big one.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #85
skyblueelephant76 said:
.I'm still confident that we'll have a much stronger squad in a couple of weeks, it's disappointing that we don't have more players through the door but the lack of emergency loans will mean there is a lot of activity across the leagues until the end of August. Not many teams will have a settled side until that's over.
Click to expand...

Makes a mockery of the 1st month really doesn't it. The window should close when the season starts
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #86
ccfcway said:
haven't we only had 2 all pre season ?
Click to expand...
Don't know they have all been called the same
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #87
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
It just seems like your branding every argument against this years recruitment policy on moaners and the 'sack the board' crew who are angry at the budget. It isn't as simple as that. It's alright being annoyed at people having a go, but I think it's completely plausible for people to be pretty concerned at the shape of the team lining up to face Swindon on Saturday. Innocent until proven guilty is one thing, but if you're loitering at the crime scene, you're only increasing the chances of conviction. Maybe Mowbray is holding out for better players, maybe it will pay off, but at the moment it's pretty clear that a lot of targets have been missed and that the amount of players that have been cut is making the gamble a pretty big one.
Click to expand...

Yes but how much of that is down to Mowbray? I am pretty sure if we wanted to go out and sign loads of players like Fleetwood or Oldham that won't be very good or Malagas and Mansetts we could have done that too?
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #88
stevefloyd said:
Don't know they have all been called the same
Click to expand...

sh1t ?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #89
ccfcway said:
haven't we only had 2 all pre season ?
Click to expand...

But then it begs the question if we have Reid / Jones / Spence / Lameries why we are getting trialists for those positions and not defenders?
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #90
Possible lol
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #91
stevefloyd said:
Our budget is dictating what we can or cannot bring in, our defence wasn't up to it last year and from what I have seen in pre season its gotten much worse, I am sure TM hasn't just sat on his butt not trying to get people in but if his intended targets want more money etc what can we do?
We let Martin go, which to me was strange because I would have let Ricketts go and keep Martin but obviously TM works with these people day in day out. I must admit I do feel slightly twitchy at the prospect of our defence atm but hopefully now August is here the coffers have a little slack in them and we may see movement of incoming signings. TM got the highest finish in a division for many a season lets hope he can bring more of that...
If we had started badly last season and then finished strong and still achieved the same position I myself would have felt more comfortable with that but he is apparently our best manager for some time so get your asses up there and support the team...remember...plenty of asses on seats mean more money means hopefully better players means promotion (hopefully)
Click to expand...

Our budget is just a budget. It's TM/MV dictating the targets we chase. To go after previously high Championship earners or injury prone players is a high risk policy that is looking like it might end up costing us valuable points at the start of a season that was supposed to be our main promotion push under Mowbray.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #92
Nick said:
But then it begs the question if we have Reid / Jones / Spence / Lameries why we are getting trialists for those positions and not defenders?
Click to expand...

to see if they are better than we already have ?

he may not have been offered any defenders he wanted to take a look at
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #93
Maybe TM wanted to see a full pre season with the likes of Harries and Leaghy to be able to assess them himself and give them a full try out...
In the last game Leaghy and Harries played the full game and I would have thought if they were to be included in the 1st team next Saturday he wouldn't have risked getting them injured
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #94
ccfcway said:
to see if they are better than we already have ?

he may not have been offered any defenders he wanted to take a look at
Click to expand...

So what happens then if the trialists are better than Jones and Reid? Do we sign them up?

People will moan about the budget and how his hands are tied and yes if we get a Championship player it is great, but we could have also had decent league 1 players.
 
Reactions: skybluepm2

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #95
skyblueelephant76 said:
People should have a look around at what else is currently happening with League One clubs.

Swindon are in a similar position and still have to bring in a number of players.

Shrewsbury were very active in the transfer market and got stuffed 4-1 in their last friendly.

Northampton have been tipped to do well but lost their last friendly 4-1 to a non-league side and ended up with Aaron Phillips playing centre-back because they have a number of injuries.

Oxford conceded 3 at Barnet with Aaron Martin giving away a penalty.

Gillingham lost 2-0 at Leyton Orient and had one of their summer signings carried off with a broken leg.

Port Vale have assembled a team of foreign players with virtually no League One experience and lost their last friendly 3-0.

I could go on and on. Lots of teams have problems at the moment, I'm still confident that we'll have a much stronger squad in a couple of weeks, it's disappointing that we don't have more players through the door but the lack of emergency loans will mean there is a lot of activity across the leagues until the end of August. Not many teams will have a settled side until that's over.
Click to expand...

How many of those teams do you expect to be top 6? Meanwhile, Bradford have just signed 6ft 2 Matt Kilgallon.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #96
Esoterica said:
How many of those teams do you expect to be top 6? Meanwhile, Bradford have just signed 6ft 2 Matt Kilgallon.
Click to expand...

So if Mowbray thought we could get Wilson, surely we could have got somebody like him?

Most of our issues last year were because of defenders, I don't buy the whole budget stuff as you would think it would be one of the first positions Mowbray would have addressed.
 
Reactions: Earlsdon_Skyblue1

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #97
A lot of players seems to move to a club nearby... Players just don't want to move house or commute.

It's as if we have to look for local midland players for a 1 season signing.
 
S

smileycov

Facebook User
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #98
Nick said:
You do realise Rotherham are in the league above don't you? Why would be able to have a better budget than them?

It is almost as if people don't really know much and think CCFC are completely seperate.
Click to expand...
Yes, a bad example tbf. However i still dont see our great budget against the rest when we have no one in. We have cut a lot and still nothing. Just worryng thats all, i understand where we are now hence the mention of not being able to compete against a team like rotherham!! my how the mighty have fallen.
Surely to god though we could have had 1 or 2 more new faces in by now.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #99
Nick said:
Yes but how much of that is down to Mowbray? I am pretty sure if we wanted to go out and sign loads of players like Fleetwood or Oldham that won't be very good or Malagas and Mansetts we could have done that too?
Click to expand...

If you're a good manager you find the middle ground between getting your shit sorted, and ensuring that your shit is good enough. Missing out on so many targets was not part of the plan and not prepared for, neither was gambling on a paper thin squad now. It's just the situation we've found ourselves in, and TM's comments today well and truly reflect that.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #100
smileycov said:
Yes, a bad example tbf. However i still dont see our great budget against the rest when we have no one in. We have cut a lot and still nothing. Just worryng thats all, i understand where we are now hence the mention of not being able to compete against a team like rotherham!! my how the mighty have fallen.
Surely to god though we could have had 1 or 2 more new faces in by now.
Click to expand...

We haven't been in the top league for donkeys years. Are people going to be upset that Bournemouth or Hull have bigger wage budgets?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #101
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
If you're a good manager you find the middle ground between getting your shit sorted, and ensuring that your shit is good enough. Missing out on so many targets was not part of the plan and not prepared for, neither was gambling on a paper thin squad now. It's just the situation we've found ourselves in, and TM's comments today well and truly reflect that.
Click to expand...

But then the whole Hunt, Henderson, Ramage stuff was shocking too and people blamed the budget. Then we picked up Jones and Gadzev.

Defence should have been his priority, especially after he let Martin go.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #102
Nick said:
So what happens then if the trialists are better than Jones and Reid? Do we sign them up?
Click to expand...

yes, and sell Lamerias.

Isn't that what we have done with Vincelot, but just haven't bought the replacement in yet
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #103
ccfcway said:
yes, and sell Lamerias.

Isn't that what we have done with Vincelot, but just haven't bought the replacement in yet
Click to expand...

I just don't see the logic in dabbling with wingers on loan when a. We aren't really playing that much with out and out winders and b. We have some already while the defence is like it is.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #104
Nick said:
But then the whole Hunt, Henderson, Ramage stuff was shocking too and people blamed the budget. Then we picked up Jones and Gadzev.

Defence should have been his priority, especially after he let Martin go.
Click to expand...

Indeed, that was poor judgment by the manager Nick. This is kind of my point.

Wholeheartedly agree on the defence side of things. It was unstable a fair amount last season, and should have been priority.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #105
Nick said:
But then the whole Hunt, Henderson, Ramage stuff was shocking too and people blamed the budget. Then we picked up Jones and Gadzev.

Defence should have been his priority, especially after he let Martin go.
Click to expand...

after the 1st game we will have a back 3 of.....Willis - Ricketts - Stokes, which is ok.

Up front we will have Sordell who scored 4 league goals last season and his replacement is Tudgay who also scored 4.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?