Absolutely I thought the same. Any parent, no matter how much you fell for the charm of a pop star, would be thoroughly angry and outraged even just recalling these events knowing that you had failed to protect your own child. That was the one aspect I thought made me doubt this whole claim. I'm sure one of the mothers said that she still "loved" Michael Jackson. I'd want him dug up and burned alive (well, dead I suppose)Watched some of the first one last night.
It reminds me far too much of that Netflix documentary.
Why is the mum all smiley and happy about her memories of him? He had been abusing her kid FFS.
There certainly isn't in my house.There is no direct correlation between IQ levels and sexual morality.
They were all wanna be parent after fame & fortune for their kids, whatever it took.Absolutely I thought the same. Any parent, no matter how much you fell for the charm of a pop star, would be thoroughly angry and outraged even just recalling these events knowing that you had failed to protect your own child. That was the one aspect I thought made me doubt this whole claim. I'm sure one of the mothers said that she still "loved" Michael Jackson. I'd want him dug up and burned alive (well, dead I suppose)
Well, no shit Sherlock! Of course they would, wouldn't they?The two guys came over very sincere for sure.
Honestly though, I really struggle with both episodes. Both completley one sided. Some of MJs family have made statements which cast doubt on some of the stories.
Well, no shit Sherlock! Of course they would, wouldn't they?
Read my post at #74I just struggle to go along with anything...anywhere with something like that. Completley unbalanced.
They didn't just say "he didnt do it" They gave examples of things the two lads said and gave their responses.
What examples?I just struggle to go along with anything...anywhere with something like that. Completley unbalanced.
They didn't just say "he didnt do it" They gave examples of things the two lads said and gave their responses.
What examples?
Think it is already accepted that Jackson had an alarm system in place for his bedrooms. That has even been admitted by those defending him.
As so much of this so called abuse was in private, in these rooms and bedrooms, there is nothing to disprove is there? Impossible to disprove.
Also interesting to note how these victims were able to describe the underside of Jackson's penis and that the maid said she saw Jackson and children showering naked together.
What are the examples? Interested to know.
Even if you think something like that how can you not realise its a bad idea to announce it publicly?Wow...just wow on these Barbara Streisand comments.
BBC News - Michael Jackson: Barbra Streisand criticised for abuse comments
Streisand criticised for Jackson comments
The two guys came over very sincere for sure.
Honestly though, I really struggle with both episodes. Both completley one sided. Some of MJs family have made statements which cast doubt on some of the stories.
And don't forget the alarm system outside his bedroom.We’re talking about a man who openly shared his bed with children, what do you think was going on? I cannot understand how some get so blinded by someone’s fame.
And don't forget the alarm system outside his bedroom.
What genuine reason could there be for that. Why not just alarm the house if it's intruders you are worried about. Wiring up an alarm specifically to his bedroom is well iffy, especially if it is bedroom where he is just alone there with young children.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?