He’s 6’2’ and strong.
Waghorn is 5’9/10, strong maybe but I’ve not seen him bring the ball down for the air with back to goal like Vic.
Still waiting for who we’d play up front if Vic is off….
Anyone….Bueller….Bueller
The answer to this is we would have to adapt the system and play to the strength of 'poachers' as you call them. Sticking Biamou in Vik's role in this team is a laughable suggestion. Vik runs whole defensive lines ragged. Biamou ran ragged chasing his first touch.He’s 6’2’ and strong.
Waghorn is 5’9/10, strong maybe but I’ve not seen him bring the ball down for the air with back to goal like Vic.
Still waiting for who we’d play up front if Vic is off….
Anyone….Bueller….Bueller
Err… nope.Oh god, still on about that one from Solihull?
If Gyokeres was out and we wanted to play a lone striker it would be Godden.
At the moment we have Godden, Walker and probably Waghorn injured. So we don't have a Gyokeres replacement right now.
That doesn't mean we don't have enough strikers.
Even worse, biamouErr… nope.
Good attempt at deflecting though.
Bottom line:
We’ve no back up to Vic.
Waghorn hasn’t set anything on fire for the money.
Max, at the time, may have been a better option to keep and use the extra few hundred grand saved on something useful.
No he wouldn’t have been.Err… nope.
Good attempt at deflecting though.
Bottom line:
We’ve no back up to Vic.
Waghorn hasn’t set anything on fire for the money.
Max, at the time, may have been a better option to keep and use the extra few hundred grand saved on something useful.
I don’t dislike him, I just don’t think he was good enough.So just to confirm you think he was a decent player in a promotion year.
So literally no reason to dislike him
You like G just love to hate players. Wilson is your current obsession
If Waghorn (1300 mins last year, that’s about 30% of possible, 1 goal) is 10 times anyone I’d be surprised. Love to know £per minute / contribution.No he wouldn’t have been.
Waghorn is 10 times the player even now and still offers us more than Biamou ever did who was one of the meekest strikers I’ve seen play for us.
No. Maybe a back up to Fadz though….I'm tall, doesn't mean I should be signed up as a backup to gyo.
How many games has your suggested replacement played since leaving us?If Waghorn (1300 mins last year, that’s about 30% of possible, 1 goal) is 10 times anyone I’d be surprised. Love to know £per minute / contribution.
Not slating Waghorn, just once again, bizarre signing and not cheap or a gamble to develop and sell on.
That MR wanted to ship him out and got no takers should say enough.
Gyokeres is quite tall and is definitely strong but he hardly ever heads the ball. We don't play that way anyway.He’s 6’2’ and strong.
Waghorn is 5’9/10, strong maybe but I’ve not seen him bring the ball down for the air with back to goal like Vic.
Still waiting for who we’d play up front if Vic is off….
Anyone….Bueller….Bueller
I don’t dislike him, I just don’t think he was good enough.
An opinion which was obviously shared by Robins and has been proven to have been spot on since he was released.
You clearly rate him and Wilson, which says it all - haha!
If Gyokeres was out and we wanted to play a lone striker it would be Godden.
At the moment we have Godden, Walker and probably Waghorn injured. So we don't have a Gyokeres replacement right now.
That doesn't mean we don't have enough strikers.
I think he maybe fancied it.Godden should have been sent packing when the Huddersfield enquiry came in
How is Hudlin doing btw?
Godden should have been sent packing when the Huddersfield enquiry came in
£700k for a striker that had just scored 12 in 24 in the Championship would be terrible business.
Luton paid £1.5m for a striker that had just scored 7 in 28 in the Championship.
Huddersfield spent £500k on a striker that had just scored 9 goals in League 2.
Goalscorers are expensive.
How much did we pay for Gyokeres?
£750k after he'd just scored 3 in 19.
Thanks for providing another example to prove my point
Er it proves the opposite - Gyokeres was an obvious talent ( well you said you would have kept Biamou but hey ho) - he hasnt scored 12 in 24 has he? Its only 3 in the last 12. Did he score 9 in the previous 12 last season?
How much in the transfer market is he worth in your opinion?
He literally scored 12 in 24 last season. Even you can't deny that.
But he hasn't this season has he or does that not count
Fact is we should never have extended the deal as we did. He's getting slower and slower, he has gone what 8 games without a goal , contributes nothing when he doesn't score and we would have actually recouped what we paid
How much is he worth in the transfer market in your opinion?
What are you talking about? Huddersfield aren’t bidding now are they? They bid in the summer, when he’d just scored 12 goals in 24 games. I don’t know how I can make that any clearer.
You said we’d get £150k for Hyam and we got 10 times that so forgive me for not holding much faith in your valuations of your latest boo boy.
Someone on here said they’d spoken to him recently. Injured. Training with a team though.I don’t get how max hasn’t signed for a league 1 club.
Does he still live in cov ?
But he hasn't this season has he or does that not count
Fact is we should never have extended the deal as we did. He's getting slower and slower, he has gone what 8 games without a goal , contributes nothing when he doesn't score and we would have actually recouped what we paid
How much is he worth in the transfer market in your opinion?
£700k for a striker that had just scored 12 in 24 in the Championship would be terrible business.
Luton paid £1.5m for a striker that had just scored 7 in 28 in the Championship.
Huddersfield spent £500k on a striker that had just scored 9 goals in League 2.
Goalscorers are expensive.
You'd have sold him at that point in time to a relegation rival?
It's good business for a striker who is past 30 and won't play more than 25 games in a season anyway.
yes - you? Also I don’t know why PVA likes the post as he thinks we aren’t a relegation candidate at all!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?