It’s frustrating because as soon as it’s not guilty or case dropped a lot of people assume innocence. Of course we’ve got to be careful with judging people but I’m this case the public ally available evidence seems pretty damming
It’s frustrating because as soon as it’s not guilty or case dropped a lot of people assume innocence. Of course we’ve got to be careful with judging people but I’m this case the public ally available evidence seems pretty dammingprobably, the defence would likely call her as a witness as well.
*Once again, this is not me or the CPS believing he is innocent just that the CPS don't believe they could get a jury to convict.
There has to be a boundary somewhere though, and however unsavoury I'd be very concerned if employability was based on populism without full access to the facts, or qualifications to judge.I find the need for a conviction a strange take personally. There are countless cases of people committing a crime and not getting convicted for it. If your whole moral compass is based on complete faith in the justice system, then fair enough, but it's not a stance I can agree with. The audio is there for everyone to hear. Any 'we don't know what happened before/after' is just nonsense. He beat her up. If there was any evidence suggesting it was false allegations/it wasn't him in the audio, it would have come to light a long time ago. She took him back like many domestic abuse victims do. Especially when said person can have a huge influence on your 'status' or 'quality of life'.
He doesn't have to be convicted of a crime to be fired from a job. All of us would be fired if an audio of that came to light and was sent to our employers. Also, if this was Diego Dalot/Harry Maguire/a youth team player, they would be got rid of. They're holding on to him because he is a financial asset. So, now their ethics lie entirely on financial gain which is deplorable for an institution like Manchester United.
I wouldn't care if he was convicted of the crime or not, if City were signing him, I'd be done with attending until he left/the person who made that decision had been forced out.
This - hence why it’s shocking when victims get hammered as lying post decision. “It’s not guilty” not innocentIt’s frustrating because as soon as it’s not guilty or case dropped a lot of people assume innocence. Of course we’ve got to be careful with judging people but I’m this case the public ally available evidence seems pretty damming
Yes, with a child now as well which makes it even more horrible.Are they still together?
Well, that's a bit strange. Or is it just part of the narrative?Yes, with a child now as well which makes it even more horrible.
yawn, back on ignore you go. So many chancesWell, that's a bit strange. Or is it just part of the narrative?
???? You are strange. Just think it's odd that they're still together after a massive court case and trial where she accused him of such vile behaviour. As odd as you.yawn, back on ignore you go. So many chances
Give us the highlights of the trial why don’t you…..???? You are strange. Just think it's odd that they're still together after a massive court case and trial where she accused him of such vile behaviour. As odd as you.
Why the hostility? Just find it odd they're still together, or is that opinion not allowed on here?!Give us the highlights of the trial why don’t you…..
She's an idiot too???? You are strange. Just think it's odd that they're still together after a massive court case and trial where she accused him of such vile behaviour. As odd as you.
Just find it strange that she hasn't left him after what she's accused him of doing. Don't get why people are getting so angry at a simple question.She's an idiot too
Why the hostility? Just find it odd they're still together, or is that opinion not allowed on here?!
Coercive control? Insecurity? A huge wad of cash?Just find it strange that she hasn't left him after what she's accused him of doing. Don't get why people are getting so angry at a simple question.
What narrative?Well, that's a bit strange. Or is it just part of the narrative?
Sorry, party of the 'story'What narrative?
Good point.Coercive control? Insecurity? A huge wad of cash?
I mean in many ways it probably shows he's guilty too, as surely if somebody wrongly accused you of that you'd be long gone?
Still don’t know what you mean. Obviously it’s ‘part of the story’ if it’s true, are you suggesting something else beyond that?Sorry, party of the 'story'
Them staying together to help him seem less 'guilty' and can carry on with his career.Still don’t know what you mean. Obviously it’s ‘part of the story’ if it’s true, are you suggesting something else beyond that?
ThErE wAs No TrIaL…….Why the hostility? Just find it odd they're still together, or is that opinion not allowed on here?!
Why didn't you just say that then?ThErE wAs No TrIaL…….
If she stays with an abuser then sadly she's sealing her own fate. Like sharing a prison cell with a lunatic and not expecting to get attacked. Bizarre.No one is saying it changes what he did.
Just saying she's an idiot too. Let sbe honest only got with him cos a footballer. Only stayed with him cos footballer. Only got back with him cos footballer.
Her family didn't bring her up well it could be argued.
Regardless she didn't deserve what happened and he deserves everything that is thrown at him.
Two different things really.
So you get abusive when asked some simple questions? Strange boy you are.Lads, just block him if he is now getting his jollies shitposting about women and abusive relationships.
Lads, just block him if he is now getting his jollies shitposting about women and abusive relationships.
It's as simple as that, I don't understand the psychology behind it all. Same with wives of rich celebs such as Fury and Mcgregor, blatantly know their men are sleeping with other women, but just carry on regardless. If someone shows me disrespect, I cut them from my life. Very strange creatures us humans.I think it's more ignorance than anything.
It's understandable that people can't work out why people return to their abusers, it makes no logical sense. They break you down into nothing, take away any shred of confidence or self belief.
In this case it's a little more complex or actually simple, she had sh*t parents and role models. He's loaded, they and her environment has influenced her to believe that behaviour is acceptable as long as she can have a fancy lifestyle.
Because you’ve come on giving it the all knowing nonsense, and you don’t even have a basic grasp of facts.Why didn't you just say that then?
I asked if they were still together, that's all. You don't like me, I get it, but grow up.Because you’ve come on giving it the all knowing nonsense, and you don’t even have a basic grasp of facts.
Perhaps I’ve misunderstood what I thought you were intimating.I asked if they were still together, that's all. You don't like me, I get it, but grow up.
Ronaldo managed to wriggle out of his one with cash but everyone still loves him. Marcus Alonso killed someone but then played at Chelsea no one batted an eyelid. At the end of the day the guy is innocent, no one knows what their relationship was like and she might have played up to it. Id love to see him play for us,
So many women stay in abusive relationships. Could be because they are scared, intimidated, have nowhere else to go, worry that they will be hunted down if they do and an abuser can wear down a person's will. Make them feel worthless and with very low self esteem.If she stays with an abuser then sadly she's sealing her own fate. Like sharing a prison cell with a lunatic and not expecting to get attacked. Bizarre.
One, he's never going to play for us.
Two, given how united the club is at the moment after years of division, would such a polarising signing be worth it no matter what their ability?
I personally wouldn't want him here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?