Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Man city penalty (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Dec 26, 2021
Forums New posts

Nick

Administrator
  • Dec 26, 2021
  • #1
If that's a penalty we should have had about 12 this season.
 
Reactions: PUSB-We_are_going_up and montydon87

Danceswithhorses

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 26, 2021
  • #2
Nick said:
If that's a penalty we should have had about 12 this season.
Click to expand...
One rule for us, one rule for 'them'.
It's been said many times, the one thing refereeing needs is consistency
 
Reactions: PUSB-We_are_going_up

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 26, 2021
  • #3
Forests Yates has just scored a funny back pass own goal, passing it back to the keeper without looking, nowhere near the keeper goes in bottom corner

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 

Danceswithhorses

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 26, 2021
  • #4
...oh and correctly interpreting the rules
 
R

robbiethemole

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 26, 2021
  • #5
And another one on Sterling
 

Mcbean

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 26, 2021
  • #6
We are going to see ourselves drop rapidly after these two days - feeling robbed
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #7
Danceswithhorses said:
One rule for us, one rule for 'them'.
It's been said many times, the one thing refereeing needs is consistency
Click to expand...

Tbf it's very easy to say and much harder to do as there is far too much subjectivety. It's always going to be the hardest thing in football to get right.

Like for me, I've done refereeing and I didn't think Southampton's penalty was a penalty yesterday. The guy has gone shoulder to shoulder both are completely off balance and then the defender takes him out whilst falling over from that contact. Clearly VAR thinks it's a penalty and the ref on the field then agreed but you'll see them now given too. Don't see what the solution is.

If you start going for letter of the law decisions to try and get greater consistency, you'll then go too far and end up with such a stop start game.

I'm not saying refereeing has been good by the way. I agre the inconsistency has been appalling all season, but I think technology is making it worse rather than better at the moment.
 
Reactions: Cov kid 55, Frostie and lifeskyblue

Nick

Administrator
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #8
Sunderland dived for a pen too
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #9
Godden is like Jesus, suspended for everyone else’s diving sins. Better hair though.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer, SomersetSB, Sky Blue Pete and 1 other person
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #10
skybluegod said:
Tbf it's very easy to say and much harder to do as there is far too much subjectivety. It's always going to be the hardest thing in football to get right.

Like for me, I've done refereeing and I didn't think Southampton's penalty was a penalty yesterday. The guy has gone shoulder to shoulder both are completely off balance and then the defender takes him out whilst falling over from that contact. Clearly VAR thinks it's a penalty and the ref on the field then agreed but you'll see them now given too. Don't see what the solution is.

If you start going for letter of the law decisions to try and get greater consistency, you'll then go too far and end up with such a stop start game.

I'm not saying refereeing has been good by the way. I agre the inconsistency has been appalling all season, but I think technology is making it worse rather than better at the moment.
Click to expand...

I think it should be left for teams to be able to challenge decisions as is done in cricket, where for offsides any error needs to be outside the margins offered by the technology.

Restrict it to offside goals, red cards and penalties. You get 3 reviews and lose one each time it’s wrong
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #11
Sunderland look really good. If we were to play them now they would give us a good game.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #12
Mcbean said:
We are going to see ourselves drop rapidly after these two days - feeling robbed
Click to expand...
Robbings out
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #13
Ccfcisparks said:
Sunderland look really good. If we were to play them now they would give us a good game.
Click to expand...

Doncaster are one of the worst sides in that league. The gap between the leagues shouldn’t be underestimated, Sunderland would probably fare like Hull if they come up
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #14
Brighton Sky Blue said:
I think it should be left for teams to be able to challenge decisions as is done in cricket, where for offsides any error needs to be outside the margins offered by the technology.

Restrict it to offside goals, red cards and penalties. You get 3 reviews and lose one each time it’s wrong
Click to expand...

Sorry, just to clarify is that just for the application of VAR? As in it would only be used if a team used one of the reviews?
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #15
skybluegod said:
Sorry, just to clarify is that just for the application of VAR? As in it would only be used if a team used one of the reviews?
Click to expand...

Yes
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #16
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Yes
Click to expand...

Interesting, biggest thing I would say against it is are there ever really more than 3 moments in a match that each team would want to appeal? Can't imagine you would often have 3+ if just for goals, red cards, pens is the only thing.

But it's got its merits too for sure.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 27, 2021
  • #17
skybluegod said:
Interesting, biggest thing I would say against it is are there ever really more than 3 moments in a match that each team would want to appeal? Can't imagine you would often have 3+ if just for goals, red cards, pens is the only thing.

But it's got its merits too for sure.
Click to expand...

The number’s up for debate. But I do like the idea of it being in the hands of teams when to review a decision
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer and skybluegod
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?