Prefer Bowen but he'll go to one of the giants
Bamford wasn't on £70k pw at Leeds when he was ready to sign with us, he was a free agent. There is a bit of a difference between someone who's contract has ended and a player who is in contract. A player in contract is almost certainly not going to accept a deal that would see him earn less than what he would get from his current contract. Either his current team is going to have to cover the difference (which suggests it's a player they really want to get rid of) or we're going to have to start offering 10+ year 40k per week contracts.Fans always get so hung up on "x player earns £££s at this club, why would he take less at another"?
There's plenty of reasons players can/will/do take pay-cuts. Just because a player is on £170 at spurs, that doesnt mean theyll NEVER play for less anywhere else.
Injury, age, more game time, sentiment. There are many reasons why a player would take a pay-cut. Why would Rashford agree to reduce his wage of £315k a week at Utd to £190k a week at Barca? No reason AT ALL, yet he has.
Paddy Bamford was on £70k a week at Leeds, but the fact he was ready to sign for us (not a chance were we offering 50% of that) suggested he was happy to take a huge pay-cut to play football.
Jack Greilish will likely NEVER get a pay deal like Man City pay him. So when he leaves them, does he take or pay-cut? Nah, might aswell give up playing football altogether rather than take a huge pay-cut.
*edit, this isnt me saying we're gonna sign Maddison, just that a player taking a pay-cut isnt that crazy an idea!
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
We will be paying similar to Burnley, Bournemouth and the like.Leeds are paying players over 100k/week it’s the going rate
Of course players take pay cuts… the point is Maddison still has 2 years left on his contract. Signing for us would just be leaving money on the table.Fans always get so hung up on "x player earns £££s at this club, why would he take less at another"?
There's plenty of reasons players can/will/do take pay-cuts. Just because a player is on £170 at spurs, that doesnt mean theyll NEVER play for less anywhere else.
Injury, age, more game time, sentiment. There are many reasons why a player would take a pay-cut. Why would Rashford agree to reduce his wage of £315k a week at Utd to £190k a week at Barca? No reason AT ALL, yet he has.
Paddy Bamford was on £70k a week at Leeds, but the fact he was ready to sign for us (not a chance were we offering 50% of that) suggested he was happy to take a huge pay-cut to play football.
Jack Greilish will likely NEVER get a pay deal like Man City pay him. So when he leaves them, does he take or pay-cut? Nah, might aswell give up playing football altogether rather than take a huge pay-cut.
*edit, this isnt me saying we're gonna sign Maddison, just that a player taking a pay-cut isnt that crazy an idea!
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
I think it will be more than that£40k
Need to give my mate props for this WhatsApp message, though I'm sure he meant at the end of the season and not 24hours later. View attachment 49582
Why not go to way whole way and bring back David Speedie and Mick CoopMaddison would fit in lovely here next season alongside Hamer, Callum Wilson, Gyokeres and O'hare
Mate, for fuck sake, chill out.If Spurs get relegated or either way do we make a bid for Maddison .. injuries aside which we know players can recover from in today’s game, he has the experience, quality and connection to be a good fit for us if we get promoted.
He has had lengthy injuries every season for about 6/7 years seasons so not a good fit. I think maybe until we get a automatic promotion spot best to leave this subject till promotion is confirmed or notMate, for fuck sake, chill out.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?