Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Liam Kelly (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Evo1883
  • Start date Feb 13, 2021
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #36
I don't really know how to word what I am about to say without it sounding like a criticism, but do we not think we are overplaying the Kelly factor just a little bit? We had a great run of form in that period he was playing but most the opposition were teams I would expect to get something out of. We beat Wycombe away, something we always tend to do, Rotherham at home, a result I imagine most of us would expect and Cardiff at home, which came off the back of a 3-2 home win against Reading without Kelly. We drew with Blues and Derby (both relegation rivals, good points all the same) and we got a good draw with Norwich who I believe had 7 players out at the time. I don't want this to come across at all like I don't like/rate Kelly, I do, but I am not as confident he is the lord and saviour some are thinking he is to our play. The guy we have replaced him with (James), is considerably more accomplished than Kelly. I tend to think our form issues are stemmed from much bigger factors than Kelly being out
 
Reactions: fernandopartridge, shmmeee, Otis and 1 other person

Frostie

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #37
larry_david said:
This is spot on. Trys to do too much every time. Count next match how many blind one touch passes he does infield to no one.
Click to expand...

Absolutely. As a team we're sometimes too pedestrian with our passing but Hamer is the opposite. His ball retention could be so much better, it's his one major weakness at the minute, almost trying too hard to make things happen. I think it was the Reading game where he gave the ball away 3 times in & around our own penalty area - can you imagine the reactions if Sheaf did that?
 
Reactions: oakey and Deleted member 11652

PUSB-We_are_going_up

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #38
I think we may already have his future replacement in Josh Eccles. He has captained the u23s for a couple of years and he is a good prospect
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #39
GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee said:
I don't really know how to word what I am about to say without it sounding like a criticism, but do we not think we are overplaying the Kelly factor just a little bit? We had a great run of form in that period he was playing but most the opposition were teams I would expect to get something out of. We beat Wycombe away, something we always tend to do, Rotherham at home, a result I imagine most of us would expect and Cardiff at home, which came off the back of a 3-2 home win against Reading without Kelly. We drew with Blues and Derby (both relegation rivals, good points all the same) and we got a good draw with Norwich who I believe had 7 players out at the time. I don't want this to come across at all like I don't like/rate Kelly, I do, but I am not as confident he is the lord and saviour some are thinking he is to our play. The guy we have replaced him with (James), is considerably more accomplished than Kelly. I tend to think our form issues are stemmed from much bigger factors than Kelly being out
Click to expand...

James is a better player than Kelly without question, we definitely need one or the other though.
 
S

steve101

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #40
GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee said:
I don't really know how to word what I am about to say without it sounding like a criticism, but do we not think we are overplaying the Kelly factor just a little bit? We had a great run of form in that period he was playing but most the opposition were teams I would expect to get something out of. We beat Wycombe away, something we always tend to do, Rotherham at home, a result I imagine most of us would expect and Cardiff at home, which came off the back of a 3-2 home win against Reading without Kelly. We drew with Blues and Derby (both relegation rivals, good points all the same) and we got a good draw with Norwich who I believe had 7 players out at the time. I don't want this to come across at all like I don't like/rate Kelly, I do, but I am not as confident he is the lord and saviour some are thinking he is to our play. The guy we have replaced him with (James), is considerably more accomplished than Kelly. I tend to think our form issues are stemmed from much bigger factors than Kelly being out
Click to expand...
I agree James is an all-round more accomplished player, but some players have more about them than physical and technical attributes. Their presence on the pitch - hence why he is captain. He is not a shouter which is probably a good thing with such a young team. He leads by example and sets the pace. A past leader who was a quiet captain and lead by example was Trevor Peake.
 
Reactions: oakey

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #41
What is the latest on Kelly when it comes to return timespan?
 

AOM

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #42
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
What is the latest on Kelly when it comes to return timespan?
Click to expand...

Robins said last week he was hopefully returning to training today
 
Reactions: PUSB-We_are_going_up, oakey, cov4theprem and 2 others

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #43
Boosh said:
So why have we signed Matty James?
Click to expand...
Because Kelly is injury prone
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #44
GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee said:
I don't really know how to word what I am about to say without it sounding like a criticism, but do we not think we are overplaying the Kelly factor just a little bit? We had a great run of form in that period he was playing but most the opposition were teams I would expect to get something out of. We beat Wycombe away, something we always tend to do, Rotherham at home, a result I imagine most of us would expect and Cardiff at home, which came off the back of a 3-2 home win against Reading without Kelly. We drew with Blues and Derby (both relegation rivals, good points all the same) and we got a good draw with Norwich who I believe had 7 players out at the time. I don't want this to come across at all like I don't like/rate Kelly, I do, but I am not as confident he is the lord and saviour some are thinking he is to our play. The guy we have replaced him with (James), is considerably more accomplished than Kelly. I tend to think our form issues are stemmed from much bigger factors than Kelly being out
Click to expand...


Look back at our results from the day he joined when hes in the starting 11.

Need to find the tweet but i asked Jim Brown a while back and our win rate with Kelly in the starting 11 compared to without is night and day. As i say il have to find the tweet but off the top of my head it was something obscene like 60 odd % win rate in games hes started since we signed him.

He's been our most understated player for a very very long time.
 
Reactions: oakey, steve101 and cc84cov

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #45
cc84cov said:
Because Kelly is injury prone
Click to expand...

In fairness James makes Kelly look like mr never miss a game
 
Reactions: eastwoodsdustman, Deleted member 5849 and oakey

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #46
I see no reason why Kelly, Sheaf and Hamer couldn't play together, either as a three with O'Hare in front or with Sheaf and Kelly a bit deeper and Hamer slightly more advanced to try and do more playing in the strikers. He's also not afraid to have a pop at goal.

How to fit all of them and James in does become a question if Kelly gets fit, with my preference being the experience of James and Kelly and Sheaf dropping to the bench.
 
Reactions: oakey and steve101

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #47
Boosh said:
It’s not hindsight. We had these issues before January and they should have been addressed.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately the budget dictated
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #48
larry_david said:
This is spot on. Trys to do too much every time. Count next match how many blind one touch passes he does infield to no one.
Click to expand...
And just as a balance count how many 1 touch passes find the target too
 
Reactions: larry_david

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #49
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
I see no reason why Kelly, Sheaf and Hamer couldn't play together, either as a three with O'Hare in front or with Sheaf and Kelly a bit deeper and Hamer slightly more advanced to try and do more playing in the strikers. He's also not afraid to have a pop at goal.

How to fit all of them and James in does become a question if Kelly gets fit, with my preference being the experience of James and Kelly and Sheaf dropping to the bench.
Click to expand...
James Kelly Hamer is the 3 I would opt for
 
Reactions: DannyThomas_1981, PUSB-We_are_going_up and oakey

higgs

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2021
  • #50
cc84cov said:
James Kelly Hamer is the 3 I would opt for
Click to expand...
Yes and bring on sheaf when the legs begin to tire

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: oakey
S

steve101

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2021
  • #51
Interesting hearing Jodi Jones podcast. He identified Liam Kelly as being the hardest trainer at the club. He said he is super fit (aerobically obviously rather than injury wise). Also he reckoned he would be most likely to become a manager.
 
Reactions: DannyThomas_1981, larry_david, oakey and 1 other person
S

Skybluebeliever

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2021
  • #52
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
What is the latest on Kelly when it comes to return timespan?
Click to expand...
Would expect him on the bench tomorrow
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #53
higgs said:
Yes and bring on sheaf when the legs begin to tire

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Why would you want a tired Sheaf on?
 

higgs

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #54
stevefloyd said:
Why would you want a tired Sheaf on?
Click to expand...
I don't want to know what he was doing on the bench if his legs are tired!!!

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Skybluedownunder

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #55
Has anybody thought that maybe Robins signed James so we don’t sign Sheaf?

Sheaf has to hit certain milestones for us to make his contract with us permanent, maybe one of them is the amount of games. Perhaps Robins thought Sheaf doesn’t cut the mustard so brought in James so he doesn’t have to take up signing Sheaf


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #56
Skybluedownunder said:
Has anybody thought that maybe Robins signed James so we don’t sign Sheaf?

Sheaf has to hit certain milestones for us to make his contract with us permanent, maybe one of them is the amount of games. Perhaps Robins thought Sheaf doesn’t cut the mustard so brought in James so he doesn’t have to take up signing Sheaf


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Oh, I do like a good conspiracy.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #57
Skybluedownunder said:
Has anybody thought that maybe Robins signed James so we don’t sign Sheaf?

Sheaf has to hit certain milestones for us to make his contract with us permanent, maybe one of them is the amount of games. Perhaps Robins thought Sheaf doesn’t cut the mustard so brought in James so he doesn’t have to take up signing Sheaf


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

No.

Since James arrived:

Norwich: Sheaf started, James came on
Reading: James started, Sheaf came on
Wednesday: Both started
Brum: Both started
Forest: Both started
Watford: Sheaf injured
Cardiff: Sheaf unused, though just back from injury.
 
Reactions: Frostie

Skybluedownunder

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #58
shmmeee said:
No.

Since James arrived:

Norwich: Sheaf started, James came on
Reading: James started, Sheaf came on
Wednesday: Both started
Brum: Both started
Forest: Both started
Watford: Sheaf injured
Cardiff: Sheaf unused, though just back from injury.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the useful info

I really not sold so far on Sheaf, his performances haven’t wow’d me yet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #59
Skybluedownunder said:
Thanks for the useful info

I really not sold so far on Sheaf, his performances haven’t wow’d me yet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I like him a lot but thought the same as you, hence why I went and found out. I think if we stay up well sign Sheaf, he’s played in 24 games already so I expect we’ll meet and requirements on that front.
 
Reactions: mark82

Frostie

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #60
Skybluedownunder said:
Has anybody thought that maybe Robins signed James so we don’t sign Sheaf?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

No. Different type of player & have played together more often than not.

James was to cover Kelly's injury but end of season could be interesting if we manage to take James permanently. Would Kelly accept a lesser role?
 

skyblueinBaku

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #61
Frostie said:
No. Different type of player & have played together more often than not.

James was to cover Kelly's injury but end of season could be interesting if we manage to take James permanently. Would Kelly accept a lesser role?
Click to expand...
I don't think that Kelly would just 'accept' a lesser role, he's not that kind of bloke. I'm sure he would fight tooth and nail to win back the shirt.
 

better days

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #62
Think Kelly's not far away
He's the sort of guy who wants to get back to help the team so I hope he doesn't rush things like Matty Godden did
 
Reactions: steve101 and Frostie

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #63
Saddlebrains said:
He's been our most understated player for a very very long time.
Click to expand...

You only think that because you cannot remember all the players who were much more understated.
 
S

steve101

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2021
  • #64
mrtrench said:
You only think that because you cannot remember all the players who were much more understated.
Click to expand...
You are not suggesting Saddlebrains is understating the understated are you?
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?