If SISU accepted a deal from ACL of 400k rent and some access to F & B streams as has been mentioned and returned to the Ricoh to play for the next 3 seasons while they built a new stadium in the Coventry area, having not been trusted enough to offer any ownership of the Ricoh, would you be happy?
Is that acceptable to ACL? If not what would be acceptable to ACL? How far would you want our football club to be 'tied' to ACL demands and wants if they refuse to let you have any of the ownership?
If SISU accepted a deal from ACL of 400k rent and some access to F & B streams as has been mentioned and returned to the Ricoh to play for the next 3 seasons while they built a new stadium in the Coventry area, having not been trusted enough to offer any ownership of the Ricoh, would you be happy?
Is that acceptable to ACL? If not what would be acceptable to ACL? How far would you want our football club to be 'tied' to ACL demands and wants if they refuse to let you have any of the ownership?
If SISU accepted a deal from ACL of 400k rent and some access to F & B streams as has been mentioned and returned to the Ricoh to play for the next 3 seasons while they built a new stadium in the Coventry area, having not been trusted enough to offer any ownership of the Ricoh, would you be happy?
Is that acceptable to ACL? If not what would be acceptable to ACL? How far would you want our football club to be 'tied' to ACL demands and wants if they refuse to let you have any of the ownership?
It would be a start, but I wonder, if after all that has been said and done over the last few months, if they were forced to play at the Ricoh, would it make their ownership of the club almost untenable ? I think the deal would be on the understanding that SISU will never own all or part of the stadium.
I doubt any deal would be done while Fisher was still CEO, or unless the Judicial Review was dropped.
If SISU accepted a deal from ACL of 400k rent and some access to F & B streams as has been mentioned and returned to the Ricoh to play for the next 3 seasons while they built a new stadium in the Coventry area, having not been trusted enough to offer any ownership of the Ricoh, would you be happy?
Is that acceptable to ACL? If not what would be acceptable to ACL? How far would you want our football club to be 'tied' to ACL demands and wants if they refuse to let you have any of the ownership?
The problem is we know that people want to buy the club and the Ricoh as a package. SISU would rather liquidate than allow that.
You really have a selective memory we had no chance of promotion before the ten points were deducted but I suppose the truth isn't importantIf they wanted to liquidate they would have done so by now. They want some investment back and will strive to get it before leaving. Why can't anyone see that? ACL need to be much more open to ideas than they have been. So far they forced admin, ending promotion hopes, now according to some will force -15 points by not signing a CVA? Who the bloody hell trust ACL motives anymore than SISU?!!
You really have a selective memory we had no chance of promotion before the ten points were deducted but I suppose the truth isn't important
Sisu have burnt their boats.
Clear they have no interest or respect for club, fans or tradition.
They had no trust from the Council and now they have none with the fanbase.
They have to go, one day they will.
If they wanted to liquidate they would have done so by now. They want some investment back and will strive to get it before leaving. Why can't anyone see that? ACL need to be much more open to ideas than they have been. So far they forced admin, ending promotion hopes, now according to some will force -15 points by not signing a CVA? Who the bloody hell trust ACL motives anymore than SISU?!!
If SISU accepted a deal from ACL of 400k rent and some access to F & B streams as has been mentioned and returned to the Ricoh to play for the next 3 seasons while they built a new stadium in the Coventry area, having not been trusted enough to offer any ownership of the Ricoh, would you be happy?
Is that acceptable to ACL? If not what would be acceptable to ACL? How far would you want our football club to be 'tied' to ACL demands and wants if they refuse to let you have any of the ownership?
If they wanted to liquidate they would have done so by now. They want some investment back and will strive to get it before leaving. Why can't anyone see that? ACL need to be much more open to ideas than they have been. So far they forced admin, ending promotion hopes, now according to some will force -15 points by not signing a CVA? Who the bloody hell trust ACL motives anymore than SISU?!!
Youre wrong about the promotion but we will leave that.I beg to differ on the promotion issue. But am I being selective about the rest? or just factual?
I beg to differ on the promotion issue. But am I being selective about the rest? or just factual?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?