But in some respects it is. If you keep it in check you tend to push to home grown thing, thus assisting the strength of the national team. Its not our money personally, all we want is our club to win at all costs. to hell with the consequences for anyone else.It's not about club v country, it's about not wanting clubs to whore themselves out to the highest bidder and blow wages and transfer fees up to insanity.
I’ve always said these rules shouldn’t be in place at all - it’s ridiculous and there is no actual fixed number a committee arrives at.
As i've previously said - put a limit on clubs taking on loans from owners. Money must be gifted. Stops owners blackmailing clubs when they lose interest.What's the answer then?
There needs to be some sort of process/rules in place otherwise clubs will continue to outspend themselves and then go bust when owners with no affection to the community just bugger off.
I don't disagree that the current way of doing things isn't the best but something needs to be in place to keep cost controls under, erm, control.
What's the answer then?
There needs to be some sort of process/rules in place otherwise clubs will continue to outspend themselves and then go bust when owners with no affection to the community just bugger off.
I don't disagree that the current way of doing things isn't the best but something needs to be in place to keep cost controls under, erm, control.
It's not about club v country, it's about not wanting clubs to whore themselves out to the highest bidder and blow wages and transfer fees up to insanity.
As i've previously said - put a limit on clubs taking on loans from owners. Money must be gifted. Stops owners blackmailing clubs when they lose interest.
That way Owners are free to fund the club with their money, but they can't load debt against the club. That way it'll make Owners think about whether they want spend their own money, rather than asking for it back on a high interest loan down the line.
Thats why i'm against loans such as that - Can be a form of blackmail. My idea is essentially that in the event that a club goes into administration its to external creditors meaning the owner can't just do what SISU did. i'm sure there will be ways around it but it'll make people think about their investmentMost loans though are just there to create a protected administration should it ever occur - we are a classic example really of manipulating rules, staging fake insolvency and carrying on
Wrexham are it seems more transparent in that they are gifting money through share issues but in the end its all the same. Owners doing big loans are aware that money is not coming back
That’s what they’re doing at Blues, with an 11% interest on borrowing. Ouch!As i've previously said - put a limit on clubs taking on loans from owners. Money must be gifted. Stops owners blackmailing clubs when they lose interest.
That way Owners are free to fund the club with their money, but they can't load debt against the club. That way it'll make Owners think about whether they want spend their own money, rather than asking for it back on a high interest loan down the line.
I’d put good money on Birmingham City not “owning” that new ground either. That’s 100% a boom or bust situation. But it’s a situation Knighthead would control in an admin situation.That’s what they’re doing at Blues, with an 11% interest on borrowing. Ouch!
Birmingham would be better off if they would just accept what they are, and then work at it and enjoy it. They should be a decent championship side, historically they are never as big as Villa, nor West Brom or WolvesI’d put good money on Birmingham City not “owning” that new ground either. That’s 100% a boom or bust situation. But it’s a situation Knighthead would control in an admin situation.
I’d put good money on Birmingham City not “owning” that new ground either. That’s 100% a boom or bust situation. But it’s a situation Knighthead would control in an admin situation.
They're after a Rugby team to co share last i heardI’d put good money on Birmingham City not “owning” that new ground either. That’s 100% a boom or bust situation. But it’s a situation Knighthead would control in an admin situation.
Also want the England women to move there permanentlyI'd say it's inevitable. The grounds not been built for blues, it's going to be built as part of a larger regeneration project with the goal of staging gigs and NFL in the stadium.
EFL club may share new 62,000-seater stadium with rugby team in £3bn project
Birmingham City could be set to groundshare with a top-flight rugby club once their new state-of-the-art stadium has opened. The Championship club unveiled impressive images last month of what thei…share.google
NoBirmingham don't have a top flight rugby team, do they.
WASP'S hopefullyThey're after a Rugby team to co share last i heard
Premier League also appealing it, hopefully it bites them hard and they end up with a bigger deduction.Appealed the six point deduction. They were bang to rights. Despicable.
If they loose the appeal should be increased to 12 pointsAppealed the six point deduction. They were bang to rights. Despicable.
If they loose the appeal should be increased to 12 points
Very risky strategy, genuinely think they got off lightly with six points.
Hopefully it will be increased to at least 12 points.If they loose the appeal should be increased to 12 points
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?