Oh dear, someone doesn't understand irony do they.
But that’s not the question is it... he’s admitted to killing him.
The question now is did he set out to kill him?
No I'm afraid that's not the question... As he'd never met him before I think we can safely assume he did not 'set out' to kill him.
However there are many pertinent questions around mental state and provocation that do need to be looked at.
What has mental state got to do with it?No I'm afraid that's not the question... As he'd never met him before I think we can safely assume he did not 'set out' to kill him.
However there are many pertinent questions around mental state and provocation that do need to be looked at.
It'a a pointless exercise arguing with someone like you, you live purely to take offence at anything and get on your high horse and rant to anyone who will give you the time of day.That someone is you.
You wrote something completely irrelevant to the case. You made it about race purely because a black man was involved, to stir shit.
Then you wrote that you were just playing devil's advocate which doesn't make sense in this case as it's not relevant in any way. You think it's something you can tag onto the end of a statement to validate saying something stupid but it's not.
It'a a pointless exercise arguing with someone like you, you live purely to take offence at anything and get on your high horse and rant to anyone who will give you the time of day.
I really couldn't give a fuck if your offended or not, and your opinion matters less to me than some shit I once stepped in.
Good day sir.
What has mental state got to do with it?
Surely no mentally healthy person would commit a murder, but the population deserve to be protected from those who would. So you could argue that any murderer is mentally unfit and should be locked away for life.
But you called me "a massively stupid c##t"I'm not offended. I just think that you're stupid.
Quite so, which is odd as surely if you've done it once your likely to do it again, And I think the public deserve to be protected from such a risk.Ironically, I suspect your own mental capacity might prevent your conviction for such a crime.
Quite so, which is odd as surely if you've done it once your likely to do it again, And I think the public deserve to be protected from such a risk.
It really does beggar belief.
If your previous statement was relating to me personally, then how bizarre.:joyful: Wooosh!
But that’s not the question is it... he’s admitted to killing him.
The question now is did he set out to kill him?
If your cutting about with a knife in your pocket then your intention is to kill no matter what bullshit excuse you come up with
Well that's my carpet fitter mate fucked then!If your cutting about with a knife in your pocket then your intention is to kill no matter what bullshit excuse you come up with
That's utter nonsense.
No wonder this country is fucked with looneys like you around.No I'm afraid that's not the question... As he'd never met him before I think we can safely assume he did not 'set out' to kill him.
However there are many pertinent questions around mental state and provocation that do need to be looked at.
Are you Chris Eubanks ??? ..........Ironically, I suspect your own mental capacity might prevent your conviction for such a crime.
Guilty of murder.
The right decision but the victim was an idiot with a death wish
I think it was because he followed him from carriage to carriage, and not leaving it at the start. Obviously he never deserved what happened and the attacker got what he deserved. Death wish maybe is a bit strong, but sometimes you just have to walk away and he had his son with him too.Why did he have a death wish? He didn't know the guy was a raving scumbag with a blade did he?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?