Voice_of_Reason
Well-Known Member
Has Justice Hickinbottom granted SISU leave to appeal yet ? After two batterings in Court already, is this likely to be granted ?
Out of interest what were the 2 battering a in court?
The JR and.....?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
If their appeal is rejected, you know they will go to the next stage and raise another appeal, which they are entitled to do. However to my untrained eye this would appear to plain stupid and cost all lot more.
Out of interest what were the 2 battering a in court?
The JR and.....?
I think he means the ACL case where ACL lost but Sisu also lost their counter claim.
The Justice Males ruling of last year - latterly overturned at appeal - for the JR. He was unequivocal in his reading of the situation:
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/judge-throws-out-sky-blues-5667471
Which they got shelved, and got their chance at having Justice Hickinbotham; who then bitch-slapped them again.
So, two batterings. well, there's a third - a Holy Trinity of losses - if you count the original (uncontested) rent hearing at Birmingham's High Court.
In essence, SISU - far from 'battering' everyone in court, seem to be to legal proceedings, what Dean Holdsworth was to our striking dilemma of 2003....
Out of interest what were the 2 battering a in court?
The JR and.....?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
The Justice Males ruling of last year - latterly overturned at appeal - for the JR. He was unequivocal in his reading of the situation:
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/judge-throws-out-sky-blues-5667471
Which they got shelved, and got their chance at having Justice Hickinbotham; who then bitch-slapped them again.
So, two batterings. well, there's a third - a Holy Trinity of losses - if you count the original (uncontested) rent hearing at Birmingham's High Court.
In essence, SISU - far from 'battering' everyone in court, seem to be to legal proceedings, what Dean Holdsworth was to our striking dilemma of 2003....
Does it really count when it was overturned a few months later. It's like some team winning an FA cup tie to find out a couple if weeks later they fielded an ineligible player and get kicked out the competition, even if they won 5-0 in the original tie.
It doesn't matter how unequivocal the original verdict was it no longer stood after the appeal.
The first judge was proved to be right as SISU's argument was shown to be fully wrong. So all the appeal win did was cost our club millions and show SISU for what they are........yet some are still making out as they are doing the right thing now and should be trusted.
The Justice Males ruling of last year - latterly overturned at appeal - for the JR. He was unequivocal in his reading of the situation:
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/judge-throws-out-sky-blues-5667471
Which they got shelved, and got their chance at having Justice Hickinbotham; who then bitch-slapped them again.
So, two batterings. well, there's a third - a Holy Trinity of losses - if you count the original (uncontested) rent hearing at Birmingham's High Court.
In essence, SISU - far from 'battering' everyone in court, seem to be to legal proceedings, what Dean Holdsworth was to our striking dilemma of 2003....
Does it really count when it was overturned a few months later. It's like some team winning an FA cup tie to find out a couple if weeks later they fielded an ineligible player and get kicked out the competition, even if they won 5-0 in the original tie.
It doesn't matter how unequivocal the original verdict was it no longer stood after the appeal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
If their appeal is rejected, you know they will go to the next stage and raise another appeal, which they are entitled to do. However to my untrained eye this would appear to plain stupid and cost all lot more.
Well yes - of course. One is s full hearing, when all facts are heard from both sides and a judge makes a ruling. In both cases a landslide ruling.
The other - via appeal - normally only a 'victory' by means of a nuance of law. In the case of the appeal against Justice Males ruling, unfortunately for SISU, as it only gave them platform to get their arse handed back to them on an even bigger stage
we have a poster on here called Grendull, you may have noticed him.
It seems very likely he is connected to SISU in some form judging by his incredibly biased postings towards SISU.
It may be a concern he said "SISU deliberately lost the JR". Does he know something? Was SISU plan always to lose and then successfully appeal?
I may be paranoid maybe!
The first judge was proved to be right as SISU's argument was shown to be fully wrong. So all the appeal win did was cost our club millions and show SISU for what they are........yet some are still making out as they are doing the right thing now and should be trusted.
we have a poster on here called Grendull, you may have noticed him
Who said they are doing be right thing and should be trusted? I don't trust them and I don't trust ACL.
It seems very likely he is connected to SISU in some form judging by his incredibly biased postings towards SISU.
Does it really count when it was overturned a few months later. It's like some team winning an FA cup tie to find out a couple if weeks later they fielded an ineligible player and get kicked out the competition, even if they won 5-0 in the original tie.
It doesn't matter how unequivocal the original verdict was it no longer stood after the appeal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I've never seen a poster called Grendull - where is he?
I've never seen a poster called Grendull - where is he?
You do realise that when you say things like that that it looks (only looks mind) that you are arguing for Sisu. Now for the purpose of keeping Covmark and a few others happy, I am not calling you a staunch supporter of Sisu. They were battered the first time round as they were in the second round. You try and use a football match for your argument but let me use a boxing match. The first round Sisu got put firmly on their arse but managed to get up after an 8 count by the ref, in the second round after a combination of punches they are not put down but smashed through the fucking ropes. They manage to finally crawl back into the ring after a 9 count. Any ref worth his salt would wave his arms and say your out. Lets hope sense prevails and ends this fucking nonsense once and for all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?