Aren't Bradford in a similar position to Walsall? Paying a former Chairmen's pension fund?
Yep, same situation which is why I'm aware of it from when I did research a couple of years ago whilst working with the club and fans on the disputes between them Back then.
If you go back a little bit further they were paying nearly £1M.
The problem with this £170,00 average that has been chucked about is I've no idea of the source of this or how it's been calculated. For instance bass it genuinely been calculated across just clubs actually renting grounds or is it the total rent paid divided by the number of clubs in the league which would artificially lower the figure.
I'd be interested to know if someone knows this.
Another thing is that just looking at the figure is misleading as well. If you take for instance Northampton who have a 150 year lease for a minimal rent, part of the terms is that they have to maintain various facilities like a running track etc to specified standards which incurs additional cost as well as making the stadium available for various community events without being able to Levy a charge for this.
The other point is as someone says Notts County pay far less but it is basically an shed. Also these were built years ago and although the built cost would have been significant in those days it probably wouldn't amount to a years salary or even a months salary for many people now and has long since been recouped. The Ricoh is the best stadium in the division this season and is still relatively newly built. So comparing the rent for it against the average for other grounds is a bit useless and misleading.
It's a bit like having a street of 25 terrace houses built in 1920 and then having a newly built 6 bedroom, high spec manor house with swimming pool at the end of the road and saying the rent is way too high for that because the average rent paid by everyone else in the street is only a fifth of what you pay for the manor house. £2,500 pcm compared to everyone else's £500pcm outrageous!