I would rather a youngster with potential to be a top player than one we know is bottom half championship at very best which also saving thousands of pounds a week.
I don't think he was suggesting an 18 year old CB, more someone 21-23 young but still developing but with potential to develop, and who has had some experience already even if at league one.I definitely wouldn't be sad to see Lati go but on the other hand I wouldn't want a raw 18 year old coming in who's hardly played anywhere either
Next summer is a summer of big change going up or notUnfortunately even if we don’t get promoted, a lot of the squad will still be off and we have another rebuild on our hands.
He is around international football, he speaks well. If he is being constructive behind the scenes then he is a good deeper squad option.I definitely wouldn't be sad to see Lati go but on the other hand I wouldn't want a raw 18 year old coming in who's hardly played anywhere either
Yep huge experienceHe is around international football, he speaks well. If he is being constructive behind the scenes then he is a good deeper squad option.
Jamaica lost 2-0 to Curacao of Gervane Kastaneer fame (and, yes, he's still in the Curacao squad, although don't think he made the match day squad against Jamaica). As it stands, Gervane Kastaneer could be going to the World Cup.
Lati was 23 when he signed weren't he, what would be the point really?I don't think he was suggesting an 18 year old CB, more someone 21-23 young but still developing but with potential to develop, and who has had some experience already even if at league one.
I'd be happy for him to stay and see the season out, but we no longer need his versatility, and he isn't really outstanding in any position, so you can see the mileage of bringing someone in a little younger with higher ceiling for development.
Why? They are 1 point of third, I think MR is looking for better than Lats. (No offence to lats) and its not as if lats was a regular under MR anyway.Its amazing that Stoke haven't come in for anyone yet. I was expecting bids for Lati and Eccles
Lati started the majority of games (9 of 14) under Robins last season. Started 28 games the previous season including 14 of the last 15 matches.Why? They are 1 point of third, I think MR is looking for better than Lats. (No offence to lats) and its not as if lats was a regular under MR anyway.
I cant see Eccles moving from here to Stoke, and I think he's rated far higher be the club than some fans imagine.
It’s what we need to do if he has the potential.Maybe Frank wants to develop Perry as fourth choice
No way, his experience will be needed to cover the inevitable mid season injury crisis.CB is a funny position because you ideally want 4 in but when you have a working partnership neither should get dropped so the 4th choice gets very little game time.
I think the ideal situation would be to move Lati on and have a younger prospect in that wouldn't want immediate game time but we'd be happy to have developing with the first team and play a few games here and there.
Yeh I was almost being gaslighted into believing it but then if I actually saw him starting a game I think I'd have a panic attack. He's ok in a back 3/5 but in a back 4 he's always looked way off it and the famous Lati flop away at Norwich was the final straw for me.I don't know why everyone is obsessed with the idea that he's good cover.
Whenever he plays we leak goals.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?