Bruce the Boot
Well-Known Member
Tobe honest Nick your comparison is utter pants .
Yep, should have parked your car in the garage that day! Gutted. Don't look at me, it's your car, you own it.
Blame who you like , but blaming others wont resolve things . Sisu are not interested , if they were they would be battling their way through this shit , instead of creating it .
Thanks for the advice, luckily I already do blame who I like.
I blame SISU, has that made fuck all difference? No. I also blame others starting with Richardson, has that made fuck all difference? No. You blame SISU 100%, has that made fuck all difference either? No, but if it makes you feel you are better than me, you go for it.
Nobody moaned when Richardson , brought in the likes of Robbie Keane .........................
Too busy singing are you watching Gregory and what a waste of money lolNobody moaned when Richardson , brought in the likes of Robbie Keane .........................
I didn't notice you moaning when on arrival SISU bought Dann and Fox.
If only we had the benefit of hindsight with Richardson and SISU.
Blame who you like , but blaming others wont resolve things . Sisu are not interested , if they were they would be battling their way through this shit , instead of creating it .
They started out with the best intentions ? And now we are at the lowest point in the clubs history ? Dann and Fox , oh yeah they sold them for profit , instead of building a team , nothin changed really ...
Tobe honest Nick your comparison is utter pants .
PMSL Tell sisu that !You own it fella, I don't. Should have looked after it better.
PMSL Tell sisu that !
As I said on another thread, Nick, say to Wasps something along the lines of 'If we drop the legal case(s), what deal are you going to offer us?'How?
Those council bastards forced SISU to buy us you mean and then told them not to give a fuck about your football club. If you say so. I expect they even put Fisher in charge just for comedy value.CCC had control over CCFC before Wasps or SISU were here didn't they?
It was even CCC who picked SISU to be here rather than companies who were interested in buying the Ricoh at the same time.
As I said on another thread, Nick, say to Wasps something along the lines of 'If we drop the legal case(s), what deal are you going to offer us?'
There's seemingly lots of double dealing and bluff going on anyway. Even if Sisu have little intention of dropping the legal stuff they can say to Wasps they will consider dropping it and they ask 'can we please sit down and talk.'
Wasps may well say 'no, you have to drop it first,' but at least there needs to be a shift in thinking. If it were me I would be saying to them that I would consider dropping the legal stuff, but would like to know what they are offering.
No, i mean what I wrote?Those council bastards forced SISU to buy us you mean and then told them not to give a fuck about your football club. If you say so. I expect they even put Fisher in charge just for comedy value.
The bottom line is though, Nick, as it stands if Wasps say no talk unless Sisu drop legal cases, we have no home after next season.That would just weaken any court case though surely? The moment they say that, wasps could say no thanks and ccc could use that to show the legal side wasn't taken seriously?
If they have a strong case they would still have a strong case. If they have a weak case....That would just weaken any court case though surely? The moment they say that, wasps could say no thanks and ccc could use that to show the legal side wasn't taken seriously?
They won't do that now whilst there's still 2 years left. The academy is the priority as that will be gone in 10 months.The bottom line is though, Nick, as it stands if Wasps say no talk unless Sisu drop legal cases, we have no home after next season.
We have to talk to them if we have nowhere else to go.
Who cares what CCC think? Sisu don't have to drop the courts cases, but they can say they will consider dropping the court cases and so 'Will you talk to us?'
The 3 minutes weren't good either.Just watched the fisher 3 mins. What a mess.
thought you where talking to TMWell I can show you where I told you directly not to put words in my mouth, let me add do not try to imply you understand my opinions or feelings on a matter.
But I'll tell you this, it is my opinion that you are not very clever when it comes to understanding what is being said, which is why you ask so many dumb questions.
A pertinent quote "It’s better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt."
Just watched the fisher 3 mins. What a mess.
Is that Fisher, the 3 minutes or both?What an absolute bumbling waste of time !
I'll try again - the council favoured SISU originally and then illogically decided they didn't trust them anymore? However, SISU have never done anything to the detriment of CCFC and have always acted with the best interests of the club in mind and continue to do so? And all this crap we put up with is someone else's fault? Thankfully there is a game tomorrow and I can again watch my under strength team struggle against mighty Swindon. Just pleased my money goes towards the wages of people as highly impressive as Tim Fisher - is it fair to assume you think he is doing a good job?No, i mean what I wrote?
I'll try again - the council favoured SISU originally and then illogically decided they didn't trust them anymore? However, SISU have never done anything to the detriment of CCFC and have always acted with the best interests of the club in mind and continue to do so? And all this crap we put up with is someone else's fault? Thankfully there is a game tomorrow and I can again watch my under strength team struggle against mighty Swindon. Just pleased my money goes towards the wages of people as highly impressive as Tim Fisher - is it fair to assume you think he is doing a good job?
As I said on another thread, Nick, say to Wasps something along the lines of 'If we drop the legal case(s), what deal are you going to offer us?'
There's seemingly lots of double dealing and bluff going on anyway. Even if Sisu have little intention of dropping the legal stuff they can say to Wasps they will consider dropping it and they ask 'can we please sit down and talk.'
Wasps may well say 'no, you have to drop it first,' but at least there needs to be a shift in thinking. If it were me I would be saying to them that I would consider dropping the legal stuff, but would like to know what they are offering.
That would just weaken any court case though surely? The moment they say that, wasps could say no thanks and ccc could use that to show the legal side wasn't taken seriously?
Although I agree with what you're saying there does seem to be more than a strong suggestion that SISU have hired a bunch of ambulance chaser types on a no win no fee basis. Have SISU got the power to stop anything now without huge personal financial costs to them? If that's the case there's no chance of it being dropped and even less chance of SISU saying they'll drop it if the deal is good enough.
We ain't going to get any help from our owners on this, I'm convinced of that. Which realistically means the only chance we have as fans is to put pressure on Wasps to get back around the table despite our owners and the course of action that the club has been put on by them.
We're on our own, that's the truth of it I fear.
Ha ha ha. Weaken any court case. Good one Nick. Thumbs up.
It would wouldn't it from their perspective? (not from mine, as I have said they are going to lose it anyway and it was pointless)
Surely they have to appear to be 100% behind it?
You can't weaken a continually failing court case that has no merit in law but regardless of how many judges point that out you continue to persue it for god knows what reason. For it to be weakened it has to have strength in the first place.
Jokes are never funny when you have to explain the punch line. I've never had to explain someone else's own punch line to them though
That is why I said from their point of view and that mine is that they will lose anyway.
I don't think their point of view necessarily differs from yours or mine. Just that they're on a train that they can't stop so can't be seen to be wavering. The strength of the court case has nothing to do with it. I think.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?