One game for managementHow long is the ban? Is it 3 games as it was a straight red? Or does it differ for management?
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Can’t defend it. Abs joke to miss half a game and only have six minutes added on. Why hasn’t the rugby approach been taken to time stoppageIt wasn’t ridiculous. It was fair what was ridiculous was the level of time wasting we accepted and accept now. Half the match it a joke.
Bastard! Was selfishly hoping for 3. I'm in hospitality at Hull away and could've sat next to himOne game for management
The rugby approach would make it even worse. The clock ticks continuously and the game ends as soon as the ball goes out after the 80mins. You'd have even more time wasted and less time added on.Can’t defend it. Abs joke to miss half a game and only have six minutes added on. Why hasn’t the rugby approach been taken to time stoppage
Is he a Yank?Maybe we can put a tariff on referees
Ignoramus.Aka, Clive Eakin
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Told the referee exactly what the viewing world thought of him.
Fair play to the Burnley supporters who stayed away in their thousands in prior protest of the twat.
Not quite true. The referee can stop the clock at any time. So that way anything he perceives as time wasting he can immediately halt the game.The rugby approach would make it even worse. The clock ticks continuously and the game ends as soon as the ball goes out after the 80mins. You'd have even more time wasted and less time added on.
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
The rugby approach would make it even worse. The clock ticks continuously and the game ends as soon as the ball goes out after the 80mins. You'd have even more time wasted and less time added on.
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
The ref could stop the clock anytime he wanted, just like he could add on as much time as he wanted. But doesn't. It wouldn't change anything. It's too far goneNot quite true. The referee can stop the clock at any time. So that way anything he perceives as time wasting he can immediately halt the game.
Probably because cunts like klopp moaned about "too much football".I somehow miss the 23/24 rules on time added on. Yes it added ridiculous time added on but thought it was a step in the right direction. Shame it seemingly got dropped
“Bring back bullying” is an absolutely spectacular amount of head-loss, bravoLook at the fucking state of the ref. Such a little fucking gimp.
Spineless little rat. Like most of them are.
100% need to bring back bullying for people like that.
“Bring back bullying” is an absolutely spectacular amount of head-loss, bravo
Ref can pause time for stoppages though. Meaning for all the time wasting done yesterday we might of got closer to 90 even if no extra time was addedThe rugby approach would make it even worse. The clock ticks continuously and the game ends as soon as the ball goes out after the 80mins. You'd have even more time wasted and less time added on.
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
“Bring back bullying” is an absolutely spectacular amount of head-loss, bravo
“Bring back bullying” is an absolutely spectacular amount of head-loss, bravo
I can go back and quote all of it if you prefer? It was all pretty funny!Do like how you only quoted part of it. Standard shit journalist.
I can go back and quote all of it if you prefer? It was all pretty funny!
Supposedly yes, but they must have insisted that Collins and Kitching conspire to give them a free hit later in the gameAnd yet the biggest decision from the officials yesterday went in our favour.
No it wasn't! Watched it loads of times and can see when our player goes to shoot the Burnley player lunges infront to block it and his legs are closer to byline and it came of him to Wright who was behind that players leading leg.Supposedly yes, but they must have insisted that Collins and Kitching conspire to give them a free hit later in the game
No it wasn't! Watched it loads of times and can see when our player goes to shoot the Burnley player lunges infront to block it and his legs are closer to byline and it came of him to Wright who was behind that players leading leg.
He’s behind the keeper thoughNo it wasn't! Watched it loads of times and can see when our player goes to shoot the Burnley player lunges infront to block it and his legs are closer to byline and it came of him to Wright who was behind that players leading leg.
On the end of his right arm?
Doesn't the player on the floor negate that? Not sure at all about it however it's just desserts for the shithousery Burnley call game managementHe’s behind the keeper though
Doesn't the player on the floor negate that? Not sure at all about it however it's just desserts for the shithousery Burnley call game management
“I don’t agree with one decision the linesman made so the ref must be fine” real big brain stuff this morning.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?