covboy1987
Well-Known Member
Most outstanding forward for any away side at the Ricoh last season tore us to shreds on his own - got to sign him - if we are after that type of quality then we are going to have a good season
We live in the 21st century now the time of mobile phones, agents, facebook etc, etc. All and their dog will know exactly who is available, out of contract, what wages they want. No secrets nowadaysHope you're right Covboy! I've calmed down a tad since yesterday but am still far from happy.
Agreed Reid would be a good step in the right direction, him and Jones on the flanks would be an exciting prospect. I'm praying we don't get gazumped now it's out in the open!
Here's to a positive week!!
Kyle Reid is a good tricky wide left player had two spells with us. On a good day a match winner on bad will fluff final delivery
(Bradford fan I know)
I can't disagree with that. But there are piles of L1 wingers who struggle to beat a man, Kyel does it for fun, his delivery is why he is in L1. I can't see a better L1 winger out there?
He is worried as he thinks his ginger friend may be on his way out
Why would it have been part of the Vince lot deal?I wouldn't want us (Walsall) to sign Reid. He looks tricky and exciting at watch at times, but badly lacks end product in terms of crossing, assists and goals. It this was part of the Vincelot deal, then they've got a better deal.
Having said that, never write players off at new clubs. You've all made your feelings known on Simeon Jackson coming to us, bit his first touch on Saturday against Derby was as good as anything I've seen for years - much better than Bradshaw's. If he scores goals as well then we'll have done ok.
Just shows how clueless you are Reid would play as part of an attacking three.
McCann is the one who would replace Haynes.
Time to finally accept Stokes is a CB not a LB?
Who's Yesterday?Stokes isn't even fit, I doubt he will play in the first month of the season.
I expect a big centre half to be signed very soon, preferably yesterday.
I wouldn't want us (Walsall) to sign Reid. He looks tricky and exciting at watch at times, but badly lacks end product in terms of crossing, assists and goals. It this was part of the Vincelot deal, then they've got a better deal.
Having said that, never write players off at new clubs. You've all made your feelings known on Simeon Jackson coming to us, bit his first touch on Saturday against Derby was as good as anything I've seen for years - much better than Bradshaw's. If he scores goals as well then we'll have done ok.
I don't know, but if we sign him I'm sure all our troubles will be far awayWho's Yesterday?
therein lies the problem with jackson im afriad. His touch was class for us... his goal scoring, well that was the same as the last half a dozen clubs he'd not scored at. he hasnt scored goals at any club he has been at since Norwich, and he wasnt really proflific then.If he scores goals as well then we'll have done ok.
Yeah, I believe in Yesterday.I don't know, but if we sign him I'm sure all our troubles will be far away
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
what are you talking about?Time to finally accept Stokes is a CB not a LB?
Kyel Reid will be a good signing for us. Reid on the left and Jones on the right is quite an exciting prospect.
We do need a seasoned goalscorer though. Sordell may or may not be he answer.
Have you seen Sordell play for us yet?Sordell and tuggy aren't the answer. We need two more strikers badly.
One needs to be an Adam Armstrong fast and skillful 20 goals a year man and one needs to be a plan b huge unit up front who can head the ball. Sordell and tuggy and good back ups. No more if we are serious in this league
what are you talking about?
Who knows. To my knowledge he played left back and was one of the players of the season. Baffling comment.
Whenever we usually sign players who have played well against us, they turn out to be pants
Let's hope he's the exception (if it happens....)
Ray Woods was a superstar though
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?