Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Kcic front bid to buy club (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Jun 20, 2014
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 27
Next
First Prev 4 of 27 Next Last

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #106
Grendel said:
It's irrelevant and best and shameless publicity seeking at worst.
ACL seem not even to have agreed an arrangement anyway so there is no offer.
It's embarrassing. I'm embarrassed this thread is embarrassing - the clubs a laughing stock and this is making us look even more ridiculous.
Click to expand...

It is embarassing. Embarassing that offers like this even have to be made.
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #107
First lets get one thing straight, there is no chance of SISU distressing ACL, that idea has gone for ever. Whatever the outcome of this JR if needs be others will come and rescue or prop up ACL. Second this is all about timing. The big players in this have yet to be identified imo. SISU have a choice, carry on regardless and take the inevitable financial hit or negotiate a deal that gives them some return eventually. I was told the other day that SISU cannot get anyone to the table for investment with the football club and apparently they have tried for months, nobody will talk seriously to them, their reputation in the business world not just the football club one is shite. Certain they want out and this could be a way of what could be a long road back, there is no way back while we are at Northampton. As I said earlier there is a long road ahead to negotiate to get somewhere near to where we want to be and hopefully this is an opening shot in that trip. The alternative is the end of a football club/team called Coventry City and that moment isn't too far away imo.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #108
The Gentleman said:
Same as at Sixfields then?
Click to expand...

I didn't say it wasn't did I? I'm not the one going on about how the club won't have to pay rent and it is rent free when they clearly will (note that I by no means think the club should play anywhere without paying their way)
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #109
lordsummerisle said:
Makes you wonder ACL didn't let the club stay on a three year contract "whilst the new stadium was being built" doesn't it really?

Three years guaranteed, and with no real likelihood of a new stadium being built would more than likely have been there in perpeptuity.
Click to expand...

Let's remember this was with the original deal in place ...........
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #110
No future with SISU said:
It will not be the club getting the stadium free or cheap, it will be a SISU company. Why would that be a good thing?
Click to expand...

I even put it in bold for you but it was obviously lost.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #111
lewys33 said:
It is embarassing. Embarassing that offers like this even have to be made.
Click to expand...

There is no offer.
 
S

Spionkop

New Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #112
The bottom line is that the KCIC proposal is a far better deal for Sisu than Northampton. Nobody can argue with that. Even the few on here who try to.
Sisu would be insane to turn it down. There seem to be one or two on here advocating that Sisu get it rent free, totally, utterly. Unbelievable (Jeff).
Try telling your mortgage company or landlord you intend to not pay - see how far you get.
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #113
Grendel said:
Rubbish - there is no offer - ACL haven't been approached.
Click to expand...

I would suggest this is the easy part wouldn't you?
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #114
We (the Club) will never own it's own stadium whether it's SISU or anyone else.

No future with SISU said:
It will not be the club getting the stadium free or cheap, it will be a SISU company. Why would that be a good thing?
Click to expand...
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #115
Grendel said:
Rubbish - there is no offer - ACL haven't been approached.
Click to expand...

Of course they have.. idiot.
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #116
Grendel said:
There is no offer.
Click to expand...

Is that a fact?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #117
AFCCOVENTRY said:
Have you informed the football league on the rental offer? They need to see this and why sisu will likely turn this down.
Click to expand...
Why?
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #118
torchomatic said:
We (the Club) will never own it's own stadium whether it's SISU or anyone else.
Click to expand...

So we should accept the groundshare as the only viable option currently?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #119
Jack Griffin said:
Of course they have.. idiot.
Click to expand...

Really, what's the "real" offer then?
 
R

RPHunt

New Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #120
Forget the rent offer - I, and I suspect most other fans want SISU gone.

They have been made an offer for the club (which is one more offer than they have ever made for the Ricoh), so why not accept it or show the council how to do things by getting the club valued and making the valuation public?
 
S

Spionkop

New Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #121
If, eventually, we had decent, co-operative, law abiding owners I'm sure the Council will work with them - and that set of decent, law abiding owners will put in a fair offer and the council, eventually, will accept it. To say otherwise is nonsense. And defeatist.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #122
RPHunt said:
Forget the rent offer - I, and I suspect most other fans want SISU gone.

They have been made an offer for the club (which is one more offer than they have ever made for the Ricoh), so why not accept it or show the council how to do things by getting the club valued and making the valuation public?
Click to expand...

I totally agree, get a valuation for the club and ACL and then somebody can buy both and bring them together! That is the ideal outcome I think.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #123
Grendel said:
It's irrelevant and best and shameless publicity seeking at worst.
ACL seem not even to have agreed an arrangement anyway so there is no offer.
It's embarrassing. I'm embarrassed this thread is embarrassing - the clubs a laughing stock and this is making us look even more ridiculous.
Click to expand...
indeed. What level of rent are KCIC going to pay ACL?
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #124
Grendel said:
Really, what's the "real" offer then?
Click to expand...


The offer is basically "KCIC" pay rent unless the crowd is over 5000. Obviously there is no "real" offer yet because currently the full details haven't been discussed. I guess it is down to SISU to see if they want to explore this "real" offer you speak off.
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #125
Instead of people saying this is rubbish, wouldn't it be better for the club to explore the option first?
 
N

No future with SISU

New Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #126
diggerdaley said:
Realistically how much is the club worth ? I think Wilson is probably worth more than the club.
Click to expand...
SISU will want back the first amount they put into the club ( I think it was £8m to £10m) and then sell the debt, it could be 10p in the pound or higher.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #127
Andy Turners view... http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/news-opinion/coventry-city-ricoh-arena-rent-7299973
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #128
This will be contender for the most unpopular post today, but this was my immediate reaction on reading the offer and this thread:

'Hmmm - I wonder if someone has now read the judge's preliminary ruling and set in motion a new plan to confuse the situation and put pressure on FL?'
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #129
Grendel said:
Rubbish - there is no offer - ACL haven't been approached.
Click to expand...

That's good for SISU isn't it? Imagine the outcry if ML is on CWR this afternoon saying this is fantastic, we're happy to accept and then ACL turn round and say they won't do it.

Win, win really for them, either ACL accept and we're back at the Ricoh making more money or ACL refuse and its great PR for SISU, would get the fans on their side and against ACL.
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #130
italiahorse said:
Can't you just for once be positive on something ?
IMHO Just throwing spanners in the works is very annoying.
Click to expand...

It's this sort of 'bury your head in the sand' mentality that's got us into this mess. They're f*&king genuine questions...what is your problem?! It's not throwing a spanner in any works, it's merely asking logical bloody questions...

WM
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #131
Jack Griffin said:
Andy Turners view... http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/news-opinion/coventry-city-ricoh-arena-rent-7299973
Click to expand...

The bit with the 5,000 may be the downfall, but we will see.

Interesting to think about the potential merchandise increase, and sponsorship as well.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #132
RPHunt said:
Forget the rent offer - I, and I suspect most other fans want SISU gone.

They have been made an offer for the club (which is one more offer than they have ever made for the Ricoh), so why not accept it or show the council how to do things by getting the club valued and making the valuation public?
Click to expand...
The council didn't make the valuation of ACL public. Why was that?
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #133
Andy turner has really put pressure on sisu here. Great article.
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #134
Do any of you seriously expect these behind this to negotiate and put details of rent etc on here. I suspect a lot of water has gone under the bridge on this one and KCIC are awaiting a response from sisu, a clever move if you think about it. If sisu are negative what will fans think especially those who go to Sixfields, will they renew their season tickets, will those who go still do so, those who don't won't, this has put sisu a little bit behind the black ball I think.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #135
lewys33 said:
The offer is basically "KCIC" pay rent unless the crowd is over 5000. Obviously there is no "real" offer yet because currently the full details haven't been discussed. I guess it is down to SISU to see if they want to explore this "real" offer you speak off.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't it be a genuinely "rent and matchday costs free" offer if there was no charge for the under 5000 crowds, but then the KCIC group picked up all the costs and rent for any crowds over 5000?

Got a feeling that this offer as it stands is the wriong way round?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #136
Nick said:
I totally agree, get a valuation for the club and ACL and then somebody can buy both and bring them together! That is the ideal outcome I think.
Click to expand...

The club is worth the proverbial £1 as an amount has to change hands for the change of ownership to take place. No one would put any value on us, we're losing a fortune and have alienated the majority of our fanbase. Pretty much the only asset we have left is Ryton and the value of that is dwarfed by our debts. For a serious takeover attempt I think you would need access to all the books, which SISU may or may not allow, to see how much is real terms SISU have put in. I would be amazed if it is as much as they claim. Once you have that figure you make them a p in the £ offer to walk away and cancel the debt. You can't put a value on that as it's really down to how much SISU will accept.
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #137
There is a poll of the CT website about should sisu accept the offer? Some have said no. 16%atm

What utter arseholes. I lose faith when I see this. Mindless thugs.
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #138
lordsummerisle said:
Wouldn't it be a genuinely "rent and matchday costs free" offer if there was no charge for the under 5000 crowds, but then the KCIC group picked up all the costs and rent for any crowds over 5000?

Got a feeling that this offer as it stands is the wriong way round?
Click to expand...

It is a little confusing, obviously it would be a lot clearer if it was completely free!
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #139
Kingokings204 said:
There is a poll of the CT website about should sisu accept the offer? Some have said no. 16%atm

What utter arseholes. I lose faith when I see this. Mindless thugs.
Click to expand...

That is because we are financially viable at sixfields - DON'T YOU GET IT?!
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #140
Kingokings204 said:
There is a poll of the CT website about should sisu accept the offer? Some have said no. 16%atm

What utter arseholes. I lose faith when I see this. Mindless thugs.
Click to expand...

I know, 84% can't do basic arithmetic, really makes my blood boil.

Blame the teachers myself.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 27
Next
First Prev 4 of 27 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?