italiahorse
Well-Known Member
The move would further stress CCFC and help Wasps. They just need to wait as CCFC gets further devalued.
If that were the case, that in itself would put the wind up Wasps...
The move would further stress CCFC and help Wasps.
They just need to wait as CCFC gets further devalued.
And the whole of Coventry will be forced to think it was all down to Tim Fisher!
Exactly.
OSB58 post is a slight variation on the OP but with a third party buying up CCFC instead of Wasps.
However, I will stick with my theory of Wasps buying us and just keep us ticking over at cost neutral for a few years.
Just like people get outraged about SISU doing to ACL you mean?
Yes, but not exactly. The losers would be Sisu not the council/ACL
So you disagree that the white elephant remarks were not aimed at nobody but CCFC being interested in the arena?
Why is it that you won't answer questions with answers but just ask more questions?
The formula price you always mention was never asked for. The 6.5m asked for was when we were still paying rent. And did SISU ever ask for a lease extension?
You say that Wasps got a bargain as they asked for a longer lease and got it. But you fail to see something about SISU not asking for a longer lease.With respect I've asked several questions to you which you are ignoring.
I fail to see how asking for a long lease would reduce the offered amount.
I think you are a bit confused.
Exactly.
OSB58 post is a slight variation on the OP but with a third party buying up CCFC instead of Wasps.
However, I will stick with my theory of Wasps buying us and just keep us ticking over at cost neutral for a few years.
.... That leaves the possibility of a white knight picking up the club for nothing .....
That's the crux of it, isn't it? A view shared by many. Who cares what happens? Who cares if it's being hypocritical? Who cares if it damages the football club as long as SISU get it?Yes, but not exactly. The losers would be Sisu not the council/ACL
That's the crux of it, isn't it? A view shared by many. Who cares what happens? Who cares if it's being hypocritical? Who cares if it damages the football club as long as SISU get it?
Sent from my P9000 using Tapatalk
Ah, you mean Hoffman?
He is very quiet these days.
No the Sisu "plan" if I recollect is 18,000 with the ability to be extended.
That's the crux of it, isn't it? A view shared by many. Who cares what happens? Who cares if it's being hypocritical? Who cares if it damages the football club as long as SISU get it?
Sent from my P9000 using Tapatalk
But if SISU had been successful and the stadium and club been united CCFC would have been the 'winners'. In your plan the only people to benefit are Wasps.Yes, but not exactly. The losers would be Sisu not the council/ACL
So we should actively help get rid of a hedge fund because they tried to distress a company, moved a sports team and don't invest and try to run us at cost neutral that we hate to help bring in a hedge fund, who distressed the football team to take us over, who moved a sports team and would run us at cost neutral.
I don't get it?
I'm saying it's going to happen regardless. So I'm saying we need to accelerate it or Sisu will battle on and take us to new lows. I'm not saying I agree with it.
You say that Wasps got a bargain as they asked for a longer lease and got it. But you fail to see something about SISU not asking for a longer lease.
Is it the JLR stadium yet? As you exclusively revealed a year ago?
By negotiating instead of taking the piss. And as we all know SISU refused to negotiate with CCC. So how could they agree to anything?How could we ask for a longer lease when the share on offer was the Higgs share?
Lease extension lay with the other side.
By negotiating instead of taking the piss. And as we all know SISU refused to negotiate with CCC. So how could they agree to anything?
It was increased just by someone moving in. And yes it was increased by being extended. And it got extended because they negotiated when SISU refused to.For goodness sake this is like pulling teeth,
So answer a question - do you think ACL would have had it's value increased at the increase of the lease? Yes or no?
It was increased just by someone moving in. And yes it was increased by being extended. And it got extended because they negotiated when SISU refused to.
And I agree yes it is like pulling teeth when year after year you try to spin the same things about CCC trying to make out it was all their fault and not the fault of SISU. They both acted badly.
Who started this shitfest by not keeping to what was agreed, not paying rent and then taking us to Northampton and leaving the arena empty so Wasps could move in? You should know this as you kept congratulating them on each move knowing nobody else would be interested in the arena.Right so you agree the lease extension automatically increases the value - good,
So who had the authority to grant a lease extension?
Right so you agree the lease extension automatically increases the value - good,
So who had the authority to grant a lease extension?
Incase Wasps pulled out and left it open for SISU?Well obviously the freeholder
A more interesting question is why was it transacted in two stages when agreed at the same point in time?
The "sale" of the extended lease was agreed at the time the sale to WASPs was agreed but as a separate transaction
Why did CCC not agree to extend the lease to ACL THEN sell the enhanced value of ACL to WASPS?
Good god your unbelievable - you even liked his post when I was saying the same thing!Incase Wasps pulled out and left it open for SISU?
A more interesting question is why was it transacted in two stages when agreed at the same point in time?
Not at all. You kept firing questions at me and not answering any to keep up with your anti CCC agenda. I am unbiased so have a go at all sides. And I agreed with what he said.Good god your unbelievable - you even liked his post when I was saying the same thing!
Lol.
Not at all. You kept firing questions at me and not answering any to keep up with your anti CCC agenda. I am unbiased so have a go at all sides. And I agreed with what he said.
But sometimes when you go on your rants I don't read everything that you put. Most of your posts are what you have been posting for years. Even on threads covering something never covered before. And all that happens is that you suck people into the same old arguments time and time again. You are worse than a stuck record.
Well obviously the freeholder
A more interesting question is why was it transacted in two stages when agreed at the same point in time?
The "sale" of the extended lease was agreed at the time the sale to WASPs was agreed but as a separate transaction
Why did CCC not agree to extend the lease to ACL THEN sell the enhanced value of ACL to WASPS?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?