Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Judicial review day 3 - judgement day (7 Viewers)

  • Thread starter AFCCOVENTRY
  • Start date Jun 12, 2014
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 14
Next
First Prev 2 of 14 Next Last

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #36
@TheSimonGilbert: We're underway. Council QC James Goudie on his feet.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #37
Rob S said:
Clive Eakin has been relegated to the public area at the back with the rest of us. I'm on the back row behind TF & SG with Pat Abel, D & Jon Strange.
Click to expand...

Have CWR been doing any coverage?
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #38
@covtelegraph: 9.42am BREAKING: Double decker bus on fire in #Coventry http://t.co/tRY6KmRdG7
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #39
Rob S said:
Clive Eakin has been relegated to the public area at the back with the rest of us. I'm on the back row behind TF & SG with Pat Abel, D & Jon Strange.
Click to expand...

Is 'D' a rapper?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #40
ccfcway said:
What's this got to do with garlic ?
Click to expand...

It is just like a Raymond Chandler novel isn't it?
 
B

Big_Ben

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #41
Seems to me that amongst all of the hot air and bluster from both (all) sides, there is a relatively simple centre thrust to the argument.
The council made the loan at preferential terms when another commercial loan had been offered, and possibly not all of the councillors had been involved in the decision.
Then they failed to comply with the EU notification that it had used its own funds to make the loan.
No matter how they have tried to mitigate and justify, that appears to have been the case.
The JR was brought on the grounds that CCC had used state funds inappropriately.
It's going to be interesting to see how this pans out .............
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #42
AFCCOVENTRY said:
@covtelegraph: 9.42am BREAKING: Double decker bus on fire in #Coventry http://t.co/tRY6KmRdG7
Click to expand...

I thought it couldn't be moved from the museum
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #43
AFCCOVENTRY said:
@covtelegraph: 9.42am BREAKING: Double decker bus on fire in #Coventry http://t.co/tRY6KmRdG7
Click to expand...

Hot news.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #44
Rob S said:
Clive Eakin has been relegated to the public area at the back with the rest of us. I'm on the back row behind TF & SG with Pat Abel, D & Jon Strange.
Click to expand...

D and Jon Strange sounds like an underground dub beat duo
 

Rob S

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #45
Overall thought from yesterday from someone who was paying close attention:
Sisu QC seemed weak but could always provide evidence and a reply when challenged by the judge. CCC QC has far stronger manner but doesn't seem to have the answers as readily when off script / challenged by judge.

Key point from yesterday could be the value of the stadium – if £15m then could exonerate CCC. If max £8.5m then more shaky. Non-payment of rent has been established in this court so could also be a major factor.

Personally, I'm not sure if anything will change. I'm going to do my best to find out what Sisu / ACL plans are post-verdict but my thought is the same as it was before: Negotiations will have to take place with all options on the table.

If CCC win then we are as we are. If Sisu win then it all depends on what CCC has to do to remedy the situation.

Ultimately, the survival of ACL as a business is what is at stake here.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #46
Big_Ben said:
Seems to me that amongst all of the hot air and bluster from both (all) sides, there is a relatively simple centre thrust to the argument.
The council made the loan at preferential terms when another commercial loan had been offered, and possibly not all of the councillors had been involved in the decision.
Then they failed to comply with the EU notification that it had used its own funds to make the loan.
No matter how they have tried to mitigate and justify, that appears to have been the case.
The JR was brought on the grounds that CCC had used state funds inappropriately.
It's going to be interesting to see how this pans out .............
Click to expand...

Did you not realise that when SISU went for a JR?
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #47
Acl and sisu arguing about non payment of rent...
 

Rob S

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #48
Bit of a tiff with the QC's there. Sisu QC objected to being misquoted re: illegal cessation of rent payments (and he was) but the point that stopping rent payments was illegal still stands. Another potential crack in Sisu's case?
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #49
Big_Ben said:
Seems to me that amongst all of the hot air and bluster from both (all) sides, there is a relatively simple centre thrust to the argument.
The council made the loan at preferential terms when another commercial loan had been offered, and possibly not all of the councillors had been involved in the decision.
Then they failed to comply with the EU notification that it had used its own funds to make the loan.
No matter how they have tried to mitigate and justify, that appears to have been the case.
The JR was brought on the grounds that CCC had used state funds inappropriately.
It's going to be interesting to see how this pans out .............
Click to expand...

This

The rest of the 3 days it tit for tat.

Lets face it, this could have been over in an hour, all ccc need to do is defend this, if they can.

This is what sisu are hanging hat on, their evidence is pretty irrelevant.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #50
Deleted member 5849 said:
Is 'D' a rapper?
Click to expand...

It's White Dee of 'Benefits Street' fame - she's in the wrong Court
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #51
Rob S said:
Bit of a tiff with the QC's there. Sisu QC objected to being misquoted re: illegal cessation of rent payments (and he was) but the point that stopping rent payments was illegal still stands. Another potential crack in Sisu's case?
Click to expand...

How could it not be illegal.
It was a legally binding contract they broke?
We're they rely suggesting that wasn't illegal?
 
B

Big_Ben

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #52
Hobo said:
Did you not realise that when SISU went for a JR?
Click to expand...

Obviously it's all been kicking around for forever, but following the case it seems to have been put much more clearly (to me, anyway).
 

Sub

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #53
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 2m Sisu QC says council responding to wrong point after referencing CCFC rent strike in council report.
 

Sub

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #54
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 2m Judge says: "the statement that CCFC stopped paying rent unlawfully is not misleading."
 

Rob S

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #55
One thing I totally forgot yesterday: The living god that is Cyrille Regis came in for part of the day. Looking very trim and apparently still playing footie (as well as that funny stick-ball old man game). Still remembering '87 and his international appearances at Wembley. Don't think he was too enthralled by the legal proceedings.
 

Sub

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #56
Council QC says Sisu moving the goalposts in the scope of their case.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #57
Rob S said:
Overall thought from yesterday from someone who was paying close attention:
Sisu QC seemed weak but could always provide evidence and a reply when challenged by the judge. CCC QC has far stronger manner but doesn't seem to have the answers as readily when off script / challenged by judge.

Key point from yesterday could be the value of the stadium – if £15m then could exonerate CCC. If max £8.5m then more shaky. Non-payment of rent has been established in this court so could also be a major factor.

Personally, I'm not sure if anything will change. I'm going to do my best to find out what Sisu / ACL plans are post-verdict but my thought is the same as it was before: Negotiations will have to take place with all options on the table.

If CCC win then we are as we are. If Sisu win then it all depends on what CCC has to do to remedy the situation.

Ultimately, the survival of ACL as a business is what is at stake here.
Click to expand...

There is likely to be no remedy if SISU win IMO. SISU illegally withheld rent. Thus their behaviour unreasonably led CCC to make a potentially incorrect decision.
If the Judge feels SISU's behaviour contributed to the council making the decision he can say no to a remedy.
 
Last edited: Jun 12, 2014

Sub

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #58
Continues the football line saying his opposite number "went off the pitch if not beyond the stand" by adding in claims based on council officer Barry Hastie's report to councillors ahead of the vote on the £14.4m loan.
 

Sub

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #59
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 23s Council QC going over EU case law now. Main thrust is advice to council must have been material misleading to breach state aid law.
 

Sub

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #60
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert · 3s Council QC also points to case which seems to show decision makers can be given too much information.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #61
Big_Ben said:
Obviously it's all been kicking around for forever, but following the case it seems to have been put much more clearly (to me, anyway).
Click to expand...

The JR remit has always been narrow. I think SISU have used it to get disclosure and try and bring things out to their advantage. However the Judge has kept it, rightly, to what is relevant to the case he is hearing.

I think a lot of fans haven't always had their heads around what the JR was going to be about, reading many of the posts in recent months.
 

Sub

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #62
Judge says councillors still had to take into account the public interest, while being constrained by state aid law.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #63
as a stab in the dark, my shout is...

the judge will say the loan didn't follow proper procedure and thus was illegal, however they were forced to do it by the rent being withheld....

result, slap on the wrists and small fine for council, with costs to be paid by each side and no compo awarded.
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #64
@TheSimonGilbert: Council QC going over EU case law now. Main thrust is advice to council must have been material misleading to breach state aid law.
 

Rob S

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #65
dongonzalos said:
How could it not be illegal.
It was a legally binding contract they broke?
We're they rely suggesting that wasn't illegal?
Click to expand...

In rebutting Sisu's claim, the CCC QC misquoted the Sisu QC (from yesterday) which is where the argument came from.

There's been a lot of discussion about the rent and if there was an agreement to reduce it, run down the escrow etc. The legal decision here (which is what counts) will be that whatever was discussed in 2012 wasn't legally binding so the club going ahead with the discussed terms is non-payment, even if reduced rather than complete non-payment.

Bear in mind that the appeal judge that got us to this point accepted that some rent was paid so the judgment today should include an actual legal decision on that if I understand correctly. We'll see what the judge says in his summing up.
 

Rob S

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #66
ccfcway said:
as a stab in the dark, my shout is...

the judge will say the loan didn't follow proper procedure and thus was illegal, however they were forced to do it by the rent being withheld....

result, slap on the wrists and small fine for council, with costs to be paid by each side and no compo awarded.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a good shout but TBH, predicting the judge's decision is, as you say, a stab in the dark.

This is really involved legal stuff so get out your dartboard or wait until THE JUDGENING!!
 

Rob S

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #67
fernandopartridge said:
It's White Dee of 'Benefits Street' fame - she's in the wrong Court
Click to expand...

You might know her from Twitter as skybluechick. She was on Late Kick Off a few months ago giving a very impassioned speech on our plight. Moz Baker has been taking the piss out of her ever since (in a nice way – everyone loves D)
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #68
AFCCOVENTRY said:
@TheSimonGilbert: Council QC going over EU case law now. Main thrust is advice to council must have been material misleading to breach state aid law.
Click to expand...

So is that him saying the state aid law was breached but because they were misled or am I reading it wrong?
 

Rob S

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #69
Rob S said:
You might know her from Twitter as skybluechick. She was on Late Kick Off a few months ago giving a very impassioned speech on our plight. Moz Baker has been taking the piss out of her ever since (in a nice way – everyone loves D)
Click to expand...

BTW, worth following @skybluechick today. She's been tweeting furiously and seems to have been picking quite a few holes in Simon Gilbert's reporting.

(For context, she's away days only but doesn't trust anyone in this dispute and just wants it over.)
 

Sub

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 12, 2014
  • #70
Council QC says loan decision was rational and “made commercial sense”.
Council QC arguing that Sisu plea to amend the grounds for their case should be rejected by the judge.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 14
Next
First Prev 2 of 14 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?