It would be rather difficult to lock up all 54 city councillors.
Do you know what the consequences would be if the council are found to have acted improperly in the bail out of ACL?
A lawyer friend informs me people could end up behind bars. Indeed, if illegal use of public funds is proven, this is extremely likely.
This is serious.
Do you know what the consequences would be if the council are found to have acted improperly in the bail out of ACL?
A lawyer friend informs me people could end up behind bars. Indeed, if illegal use of public funds is proven, this is extremely likely.
This is serious.
Big word, if. IMO if there was any chance of SISU's charge sticking there would have been a bit more of a stink at the time that they did it-and certianly not a unanimous Council backing for the course of action taken. Don't believe the SISU hype.
But this was sanctioned behind closed doors without any media attention. That would be a good way to reduce any potential "stink".
Do we have a date for the ruling on this ?
It would be rather difficult to lock up all 54 city councillors.
But this was sanctioned behind closed doors without any media attention. That would be a good way to reduce any potential "stink".
I love the SISU rats coming on here. It at least gives us a clue into what they are thinking and the avenues they are persuing
Why the mystery, you're clearly not remotely anywhere near the fence, you only have to look at 2 of your posts never mind all 19 of them. Bit sad you're not prepared to have the courage of your convictions. Or is part of your spin to appear to come from a position of neutrality?
Yes and sisu are the epitomy of open and honest dealings with people!
Isn't it one of the fundamental rules of the league that clubs should pay its footballing financial commitments in a prompt timeframe?
But your right sisu are the good guys (this is sarcasm btw)
Why do you always have to deal in absolutes? This isn't "Cowboys and Indians" or "Goodies and Baddies" its real life. In reality, because you don't agree with one side, it doesn't mean the other is incapable of acting in a corrupt or wrongful way... As is proven here.
Why do you always have to deal in absolutes? This isn't "Cowboys and Indians" or "Goodies and Baddies" its real life. In reality, because you don't agree with one side, it doesn't mean the other is incapable of acting in a corrupt or wrongful way... As is proven here.
Why do you always have to deal in absolutes? This isn't "Cowboys and Indians" or "Goodies and Baddies" its real life. In reality, because you don't agree with one side, it doesn't mean the other is incapable of acting in a corrupt or wrongful way... As is proven here.
Who's been proven to act in a corrupt or legal way?
My understanding is it's the Council, rather than councillors that has been alleged to have acted wrongly. This could run and run. It's all about European law, so could end up in th European courts. If they've just not done things properly, then presumably they can just go back & comply with the regulations this time. If proven to be illegal, then I think the Council get fined. So guess who ends up paying ? Again.
Why do you always have to deal in absolutes? This isn't "Cowboys and Indians" or "Goodies and Baddies" its real life. In reality, because you don't agree with one side, it doesn't mean the other is incapable of acting in a corrupt or wrongful way... As is proven here.
I think for you to go to Prison what you do has to be Criminal (if there's any lawyers who can confirm or deny this please do). So are you saying that this was a criminal act bailing out a stadium management company that they are part owners of?Not that simple I'm afraid. People could end up in prison. Someone is always accountable
I'm sick to death of people polarising every debate as pro or anti SISU.
SISU might have at the time of the bail out thought to themselves...hmmm cheap loan to take on if we manage to buy in at some point should all go well, & ammunition to support our case if things go wrong - so silence was the best option at the time.
Councils & Governments in this country are designed to delegate responsibility whilst retaining control. That way if good happens they claim input...if bad happens it is someone else's fault. Only if there are some clearly criminal activities will anyone be imprisoned - so expect just a few red faces at worst.
The biggest thing that could come from this IMO is compensation claims from SISU against the council due to the resulting 10pt deduction thereby knocking the wind out of the play-off push, protecting ACL from hostile bidding (by them) & i'm sure a few other spin-offs.
Remember psgm1 thinks Coventry supporters are scum, sky blue trust are the devil incarnate amongst a number of other curious accusations.
He is like a lunatic locked in an attic in a 70's horror film. He crawls out if his cesspit now and again to try and reap mayhem.
He's a twat.
This forum is becoming full of inarticulate, ill educated people who just hurl the same tiresome insults whilst offering nothing to debate with.
I think for you to go to Prison what you do has to be Criminal (if there's any lawyers who can confirm or deny this please do). So are you saying that this was a criminal act bailing out a stadium management company that they are part owners of?
I'm as on the fence as you could be my friend. I just thought I'd share what I'd heard in relation to the potential consequences as I found it interesting.
Of course, there my not even be a case to answer. Time will tell.
My understanding is it might not even get to court yet.
All that has happened is Sisu have asked to court to look into it, to see if there is a case to be had.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?