Sub
Well-Known Member
i dont think either will happen The FL have no balls (so to speak) :facepalm:
i dont think either will happen The FL have no balls (so to speak) :facepalm:It's simple either FL take the golden share of fans stop going. Got to end this nightmare and these actions achieve it imo.
Fisher has made great play lately of distancing CCFC and himself from Sisu and their activities, particularly the legal actions. I wonder how he will try to spin things this time so that he can again claim it's nothing to do with him?separate but under the same control. The point is this time CCFC will be directly involved
Be fascinating to see whether JR 2 does show that the council were never negotiating with CCFC in good faith. Though I suspect all the early discussions between senior people in ACL / CCC were strictly off the record.
What if Fisher is right, SISU is not CCFC and has nothing to do with us?
Imagine if SISU win the JR2 and somehow then eventually gain ownership of the stadium.
Could they then sell the Ricoh to whoever they want but not CCFC, just to right royally fuck us over and disappear back to London/Cayman Islands??
Interesting the Councilor Duggins has said that Sisu have failed to pay the £500k+ costs from JR1.
When are they due? Is it now for JR1 or do the costs roll over to JR2 and they don't have to pay out until the whole thing comes to an end.Interesting the Councilor Duggins has said that Sisu have failed to pay the £500k+ costs from JR1.
CCFC is listed in the JR interested parties with SISU controlled companies trading as CCFC v CCC/Wasps/Higgs etc.
This sort of blows away Nick`s claim that SISU and CCFC are totally different, not that 95% of fans thought this was the case in the first place and I imagine the 5% of fans who support the owners or only worry about the next match will change there position either.
CCFC is listed in the JR interested parties with SISU controlled companies trading as CCFC v CCC/Wasps/Higgs etc.
This sort of blows away Nick`s claim that SISU and CCFC are totally different, not that 95% of fans thought this was the case in the first place and I imagine the 5% of fans who support the owners or only worry about the next match will change there position either.
If you look closely it has a little "v" between CCFC/SISU and CCC/Wasps.... That little "v" means VERSUS.If they are the same why are they joined in along with WASPS & CCC?
CCFC is listed in the JR interested parties with SISU controlled companies trading as CCFC v CCC/Wasps/Higgs etc.
This sort of blows away Nick`s claim that SISU and CCFC are totally different, not that 95% of fans thought this was the case in the first place and I imagine the 5% of fans who support the owners or only worry about the next match will change there position either.
CCFC is listed in the JR interested parties with SISU controlled companies trading as CCFC v CCC/Wasps/Higgs etc.
This sort of blows away Nick`s claim that SISU and CCFC are totally different, not that 95% of fans thought this was the case in the first place and I imagine the 5% of fans who support the owners or only worry about the next match will change there position either.
Totally agree , In political terms I'm slap bang in the centre.I hereby solemnly vow to not get involved in any further threads about fucking J fucking R fucking 2......
can't believe how many hours of my life I wasted reading some of the most mind numbingly boring financial & legal bullshit last time around....
My default position remains this:
Sisu, ACL, CCC, CT & Wasps are all cunts and because of them, CCFC are fucked for the foreseeable future, possibly ever.
.....Carry on.
CCFC is listed in the JR interested parties with SISU controlled companies trading as CCFC v CCC/Wasps/Higgs etc.
This sort of blows away Nick`s claim that SISU and CCFC are totally different, not that 95% of fans thought this was the case in the first place and I imagine the 5% of fans who support the owners or only worry about the next match will change there position either.
I can safely say the "Are SISU and CCFC the same thing" argument has to be my least favourite on this site. So pointless.
Isn't really if people kick CCFC thinking they are kicking SISU for example.
I agree, it is a bit tedious when even though OSB and others also say it then it just gets ignored anyway as people aren't interested and just carry on saying things anyway.
It's just such an arbitrary distinction. They are separate legal entities, but CCFC are owned by Sisu.
Really don't want to get into this, but as I can't resist a tedious argument on semantics, here we go:
Sisu's offices aren't Sisu, they are something that's owned by Sisu. Yet you suggested (IIRC) that gluing the locks at their offices would be a justified protest (as an example, I know you weren't suggesting we do it). But that would be targeting Sisu's property, not Sisu. Similarly attacking their investors isn't Sisu, it's their relationships.
A company is a legal construct, not an actual physical thing. Any protest will inevitably not be "attacking Sisu" but something they own, just like CCFC. Which is why the whole distinction is pointless.
Standard disclaimer that I don't support protests that harm what's going on on the pitch or lead to points deductions, but because I think it loses us the moral high ground rather than because of some pedantic distinction between the two entities. It is my belief that Sisu are fucking things up enough on the pitch to give us a valid complaint, adding to that ourselves muddies those waters.
So you are saying 95% of our fans are incorrect about something? Worrying.
Using your logic if they were the same thing then CCFC (Otium) wouldn't be listed, as they would just list SISU.
Read OSB's reply, he explained it better minus the sarcasm
I gave an example of something that would bother SISU. I understand a lock (and it was a very off the cuff idea) isn't SISU or Joy Seppalla but it was an example of something aimed at SISU directly and causing them inconvenience as SISU (I was asked an example of action against SISU that wasn't CCFC). She openly says she only cares about her investors, which is why action relating to them is suggested over certain things at CCFC and she doesn't care about that
Plus, unless people claim to be lifelong fans of those locks at SISU and being angry about their upkeep then it's completely different than it being CCFC if they stuck a bit of glue in
Splitting hairs as you will do when on the back foot. CCFC are named in the JR, the companies who are trading as CCFC have bought the action against CCC and Wasps are all controlled by SISU, stand in the away end at stadium MK and try to persuade fans that the club and SISU are separate entities and they are protesting at the wrong places. They are the ones that matter, the fans that go not faceless user names like me, OSB and yousrelf. I know 2 people in the real world who are buying a season ticket next year, I can think of 30 who are not buying one as they see it as giving money to SISU, the company structure OSB pointed out means nothing to 95% of supporters. Good luck if you ever try to point it out that they are wrong.
SISU have the ability to stop this and secure the clubs future no one else.
Anyway, what is your veiw on this JR, a good thing or a bad thing for CCFC?
So, on topic: what was the time from start to finish on the last JR?
Asking because surely if this goes past Brexit the ECJ won't have power over the UK at that point and state aid rules probably won't apply. Or does it still count for cases started before Brexit?
CCFC is listed in the JR interested parties with SISU controlled companies trading as CCFC v CCC/Wasps/Higgs etc.If you look closely it has a little "v" between CCFC/SISU and CCC/Wasps.... That little "v" means VERSUS.
Nick i realise SISU and CCFC are different companies but who is it that controls CCFC and who makes the desisions on budgets ect ect??
It isn't splitting hairs and there is no back foot, because they aren't the same thing.
So if they are the same thing why do they need to be named? Why can't they just say "SISU" and that includes CCFC (Otium) if they are the same?
There's not really much point in trying to point things out to people, they don't give a shit about the facts which is worrying isn't it? If 95% of people believe something which is actually incorrect then how do they work out action that is going to be effective against the right people? Maybe people should listen to people like OSB whether they agree with them or not, rather than just dismiss it straight off?
I can't see SISU winning this one either, the only "good" thing that may come out of it is more information about what went on but that's not going to really get anybody anywhere. I said months (probably years now) when there was a poll that I thought it would be pointless.
Yes, but my point about them being different is about care and damage with action.
It's a bit like punching the girl on the checkout because you aren't happy with the big boss.
They are separated off, if CCFC go bust tomorrow it doesn't mean SISU will. It will all be ringfenced off, they will just stroll off to other investments as if nothing has happened. Joy has her money, Dermot has his money.
That's my point when I say about them being different. Just because somebody can control something, it doesn't mean that if that something gets blown up that the person controlling it would be damaged in the slightest does it?
If CCFC did a Leicester and in 5-6 years time under the same ownership, won the Premiership, would SISU benefit from it?
If so surly when being hit by lack of attendance they must also take the hit?? Stand corrected if I'm wrong
I agree with what your saying Just another question
What would happen if AVRo or Sisu went bust ? what would happen to CCFC ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?