Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

JR Review (7 Viewers)

  • Thread starter The Gentleman
  • Start date Nov 25, 2013
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
T

The Gentleman

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #1
Can someone tell me when this is this week ?
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #2
THursday, I believe.
 
A

Ashdown1

New Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #3
Be all over in 20 minutes, don't blink..................well until they appeal the re appeal and set another date for sometime around the Scottish referendum ?!!
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #4
Ashdown1 said:
Be all over in 20 minutes, don't blink..................well until they appeal the re appeal and set another date for sometime around the Scottish referendum ?!!
Click to expand...

.... or they go to court and say they have not got all the information they require (Requested but refused by court) and the judge adjourns to enable them to get the information.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #5
The Gentleman said:
Can someone tell me when this is this week ?
Click to expand...

Is this about who shot him?
 
T

The Gentleman

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #6
fernandopartridge said:
Is this about who shot him?
Click to expand...

I thought it was Sue Ellen but need to know for sure
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #7
The Gentleman said:
I thought it was Sue Ellen but need to know for sure
Click to expand...

Seppalla is American, it's not beyond the realms of possibility......
 
T

The Gentleman

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #8
fernandopartridge said:
Seppalla is American, it's not beyond the realms of possibility......
Click to expand...

After thinking about it, you may be right. I heard she occasionally wears a stetson and dabbles with oil, or was that just the buffoon Fishers wishful thinking !
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #9
fernandopartridge said:
Seppalla is American, it's not beyond the realms of possibility......
Click to expand...

A shot in the dark? That was Ozzy Osborne's Blizzard of Oz wasn't it?
 
S

shy_tall_knight

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #10
Sorry to break up on the jokes but the whole JR demonstrates to me on how disingenuous SISU have been regarding the Ricoh, have been planning to build a new stadium for 12 months according to Fisher, not returning etc.. so why are they continuing with this potentially costly legal action. its all about the Ricoh they want it so badly they are prepared to take the team out of Coventry.
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #11
italiahorse said:
.... or they go to court and say they have not got all the information they require (Requested but refused by court) and the judge adjourns to enable them to get the information.
Click to expand...
I thought the judge had said they enough information to make the appeal and that was why the request was refused. Therefore if they can't make the appeal with the information that they already have.......is the appeal likely to succeed?
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #12
torchomatic said:
THursday, I believe.
Click to expand...

Ha! It had to be Thursday, didn't it?!

The day when to Cov news mill goes into overdrive!

WM
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #13
James Smith said:
I thought the judge had said they enough information to make the appeal and that was why the request was refused. Therefore if they can't make the appeal with the information that they already have.......is the appeal likely to succeed?
Click to expand...

Another genuine question.

What grounds did they have to make the appeal anyway? I thought things were only able to be appealed if either the process wasn't followed, or new information came to light?

If it's just appeal after appeal after appeal... this could take a while!
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #14
Deleted member 5849 said:
Another genuine question.

What grounds did they have to make the appeal anyway? I thought things were only able to be appealed if either the process wasn't followed, or new information came to light?

If it's just appeal after appeal after appeal... this could take a while!
Click to expand...

I am not sure if it is an appeal as such, I think every JR application is a fresh one based on new evidence.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #15
fernandopartridge said:
I am not sure if it is an appeal as such, I think every JR application is a fresh one based on new evidence.
Click to expand...

So any idea what the fresh evidence they're presenting is?

Have they got anymore fresh evidence for the next one?

Would a fine conspiracy theory be to say they hold evidence back until the time they actually want it to go to review?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #16
Deleted member 5849 said:
So any idea what the fresh evidence they're presenting is?

Have they got anymore fresh evidence for the next one?

Would a fine conspiracy theory be to say they hold evidence back until the time they actually want it to go to review?
Click to expand...

Who knows. The request for fresh evidence in the form of internal communications from the council was turned down. I can't see there being any evidence that isn't already in the public domain, but who knows.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #17
the original judgement was given on the basis of the written evidence supplied to the court. Thursday sees the oral examination of the same evidence and is happening because SISU etc have the right to request an oral hearing if the first judgement goes against them. It is not a case to examine the rights or wrong of the facts it is a process to decide if the case has enough merit to go to a full court case
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #18
Semaphore next then.
 
L

lapsed_skyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #19
Deleted member 5849 said:
Semaphore next then.
Click to expand...

Followed by mime artists.
@
In recognition of today's communication tools perhaps a submission made within the character constraints of Twitter would encourage brevity and thus speed us to the final denouement.
 
T

The Gentleman

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #20
Deleted member 5849 said:
Another genuine question.

What grounds did they have to make the appeal anyway? I thought things were only able to be appealed if either the process wasn't followed, or new information came to light?

If it's just appeal after appeal after appeal... this could take a while!
Click to expand...

Apparently Fisher found an old receipt in the back pocket of the trousers he wore to the meeting with ACL/CCC. In all seriousness though, does dragging this through courts and appeals not suit Sisu but harm the football club and any chance of a speedy return to the Ricoh, or alternatively slow them up building our mythical meccano stadium. I wonder where the costs for all this will be laid..........
 
A

Ashdown1

New Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #21
I'd just sum it up and say...........if the legal profession can make some serious money out of this then it will inevitably keep rolling to a court case.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #22
oldskyblue58 said:
the original judgement was given on the basis of the written evidence supplied to the court. Thursday sees the oral examination of the same evidence and is happening because SISU etc have the right to request an oral hearing if the first judgement goes against them. It is not a case to examine the rights or wrong of the facts it is a process to decide if the case has enough merit to go to a full court case
Click to expand...

Yep, that's as I understand it too. About 85% of these reviews fail. Where the review succeeds, about the same percentage fail when it gets to court. In other words, the odds of SISU winning are pretty long (based on a coarse statisitical analysis at least, plus the fact that the original decision seemed somewhat damning of their case as presented).

If this review fails, I think that's it for this specific case. I suppose SISU could apply for another JR under entirely different grounds, but this one would be dead.
 

Danceswithhorses

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #23
The Gentleman said:
I wonder where the costs for all this will be laid..........
Click to expand...
I think we can all hazard an educated guess as to where the cost of all this are going...onto the ever increasing debt pile of CCFC
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #24
shy_tall_knight said:
Sorry to break up on the jokes but the whole JR demonstrates to me on how disingenuous SISU have been regarding the Ricoh, have been planning to build a new stadium for 12 months according to Fisher, not returning etc.. so why are they continuing with this potentially costly legal action. its all about the Ricoh they want it so badly they are prepared to take the team out of Coventry.
Click to expand...

Sorry to break up the seriousness & for any sarcasm...but none of us ever suspected SISU were disingenuous did we? Missed that one...& err...the Ricoh is immovable, it's in Coventry - so if they got it...surely they'd bring us Home anyway.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #25
Danceswithhorses said:
I think we can all hazard an educated guess as to where the cost of all this are going...onto the ever increasing debt pile of CCFC
Click to expand...

management fee's? possibly cover a multitude of sins.
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #26
Just a thought Sisu, otium, Arvo, ccfc wasn't this a joint case against ccc. If so who will be liable for the costs which could end up far greater than what was ever owed in rent.
If Sisu lose and have to pay this costs and don't are they just setting up liquidation of another company ?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #27
sky blue john said:
Just a thought Sisu, otium, Arvo, ccfc wasn't this a joint case against ccc. If so who will be liable for the costs which could end up far greater than what was ever owed in rent.
If Sisu lose and have to pay this costs and don't are they just setting up liquidation of another company ?
Click to expand...

Someone will be along to tell me I'm wrong, but I thought "costs" only applied in an actual court case. This is a request for a JR, so I'd assume each party pays their own costs up front, no?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #28
shmmeee said:
Someone will be along to tell me I'm wrong, but I thought "costs" only applied in an actual court case. This is a request for a JR, so I'd assume each party pays their own costs up front, no?
Click to expand...

With as little knowledge as you, I'd always assumed each side needed a lawyer for this kind of thing, but as it's just a hearing to see if a Judicial Review actually happens or not, costs won't exactly break the bank.
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #29
shmmeee said:
Someone will be along to tell me I'm wrong, but I thought "costs" only applied in an actual court case. This is a request for a JR, so I'd assume each party pays their own costs up front, no?
Click to expand...

I believe SISU were ordered to pay costs at the original hearing.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #30
Samo said:
I believe SISU were ordered to pay costs at the original hearing.
Click to expand...

I stand corrected.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #31
shmmeee said:
I stand corrected.
Click to expand...

Around £7k. IIRC.
 
S

Steve.B50

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #32
wingy said:
Around £7k. IIRC.
Click to expand...

Wingy. Where have you been?
 

robbieray

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #33
Can we go back to the jokes now please
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #34
SkyblueBazza said:
Sorry to break up the seriousness & for any sarcasm...but none of us ever suspected SISU were disingenuous did we? Missed that one...& err...the Ricoh is immovable, it's in Coventry - so if they got it...surely they'd bring us Home anyway.
Click to expand...

Sorry to be obvious, but buildings & land usually is pretty immobile.. nevertheless they're worth having as assets..
 

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 25, 2013
  • #35
Jack Griffin said:
Sorry to be obvious, but buildings & land usually is pretty immobile.. nevertheless they're worth having as assets..
Click to expand...

Conspiracy theorist..
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?