we have laodsThere is the winger/attacking player (although his goal scoring record is as good as a striker)
Well done MR.
Striker next please.
Ahh but my stats are based on the senior team...I sincerely hope we affectionately call him notch very very soon8 in 12 for the reserves, hardly 'no notch' from midfield.
I think Nazon doesn't want to stay with us. Robins almost certainly knows thisThat tells me that Nazon is probably off.
we have laods
winger needed. and out and out one
repalce andreu and jones. thats priority.
But what we have seen is that Ponticelli certainly isn't ready or good enough to start ousting senior players no matter i that they aren't scoringGood luck to the lad, I hope he does well here.
However if I was ponticelli I’d be telling my agent to get me the fuck out of this place!
Ahh its a case of right hand and left hand not in snc and also Dale Evans is alleged to be involvedI don't know how we're signing players with all these takeover details to finalise for the morning.
From what I've seen from Ponti this season, I'm far from impressed. He was almost graced as being the next messiah at the beginning of the campaign and since then his performances have gone downhill. Hopefully Barrett coming in will shake him up enough to get him performing to the level everyone knows he can play at.
Ponticelli has come into in my opinion an average at best side playing perhaps nescesarily a defensive formation, I’ll judge him when our team formation is more positive.From what I've seen from Ponti this season, I'm far from impressed. He was almost graced as being the next messiah at the beginning of the campaign and since then his performances have gone downhill. Hopefully Barrett coming in will shake him up enough to get him performing to the level everyone knows he can play at.
Maybe it will improve Addai as well?
Explain your sarcasm
That's him AND Ponticelli then!He doesn't play in the same position as Barrett either.
Ponticelli has come into in my opinion an average at best side playing perhaps nescesarily a defensive formation, I’ll judge him when our team formation is more positive.
If he's come in to an 'average at best' side (one who is an above average place in the league table and has beaten a number of above average teams), surely he'd stand out more?
Surprised any loan has been agreed considering the impending financial doom at the club according to you
He doesn't play in the same position as Barrett either.
We have paid Reading with minibuses and trialist kit.
Barrett has been used as a striker/forward in the past though? He's either been labeled as a forward OR a midfielder throughout his youth career. Robins has played Ponti in similar positions this season so your sarcasm is completely misguided.
Ponticelli is an out and out striker as opposed to a creative midfielder who will make things happen.
We might as well get angry that Bayliss started last game and Ponticelli didn't as well.
We could very well throw our toys out the pram about it but that fact of the matter is Barrett is a versatile attacking player that can either play as a striker/forward or a creative midfielder - Bayliss isn't.
Robins has utilised Ponti in the No. 9 position as well as out wide - where Barrett has similarly been known to play. It's more than likely he'll play in the No.10. role as that's where it's reported he's most effective. But to dismiss my point of the two players having no link is simply wrong.
Ponticelli has gone out wide for periods if we make a change rather than starting there, it's more to accommodate other strikers. Last few games Ponticelli hasn't made the bench, which is before the new bloke has come in.
If this guy can come in and make a real difference then it doesn't matter too much as to who he replaces, I don't think he will be like for like competition for the strikers though.
And hopefully he'll get a few days training with the team before he's eligible to play.Attacking midfielder/winger who score goals. We would be screaming at MR to play him if he had that record in our U23s, so in my eyes it seems a good move. We are unlikely to recruit an established player of that ilk from Prem, Championship, or even League 1, so up and coming players like this was always likely to be the way. Fingers crossed - and nice to see it get done early, as it suggests that it is someone we want, rather than the bottom of the barrel 5 mins before the deadline.
Agree. Honestly can't see much of a threat from Barrett to Ponticelli and can see no reason why they both couldn't play anyway.And hopefully he'll get a few days training with the team before he's eligible to play.
And to comment on Ponticelli, from what I have seen he is the sort of player who picks up on chances created by others so he ought to benefit
Maybe we should just wait and see what position / role he’s given.
And if he fits the bill and is any good or not. One thing though, if our academy is a hot bed of talent like everyone keeps banging on about-why are we going to get a player from Readings to put in the team?Maybe we should just wait and see what position / role he’s given.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?