Otis
Well-Known Member
Not probably. Certainly!!!! Batshit crazy extra.
Not probably. Certainly!!!! Batshit crazy extra.probably... maybe
Defiantly maybe.probably... maybe
Stubborn bugger, eh!!Defiantly maybe.
Both. Played right wing and number 10 in recent games.Does he play just behind the strikers or out wide?
We've got rid of him already?? WTF!!...a step down . He's gone to a club with huge potential though.
Have to say, I like the sound of him. He might just make a home hereA couple of clips:
Though it now seems that this new lad is an attacking midfielder, not an out and out striker, so no challenge to Ponticelli at all.Good luck to the lad, I hope he does well here.
However if I was ponticelli I’d be telling my agent to get me the fuck out of this place!
Though it now seems that this new lad is an attacking midfielder, not an out and out striker, so no challenge to Ponticelli at all.
Good luck to the lad, I hope he does well here.
However if I was ponticelli I’d be telling my agent to get me the fuck out of this place!
The comparisons with Ponticelli are pointless. Ponti might be 19 but he is far less experienced, he needs easing in. This lad has played a bit more and plays in a different position in any case.
I keep forgetting about Kwame Thomas. Doesn't seem to have a future here unfortunately.
That back heel flicked goal he score though will always linger long in the memory.
Ponticelli will improve and hopefully thrive playing with better players, we need more.Good luck to the lad, I hope he does well here.
However if I was ponticelli I’d be telling my agent to get me the fuck out of this place!
Ponti is still a prospect and nothing more. Plus this guy is a CAM not an out-and-out striker.
Oh, my bad it would appear. I got the headline “city sign Reading forward”Though it now seems that this new lad is an attacking midfielder, not an out and out striker, so no challenge to Ponticelli at all.
The offal actually said 'attacking player' too and with his goal stats it was easy to have mistaken him for a striker at first.Oh, my bad it would appear. I got the headline “city sign Reading forward”
From the Coventry Telegraph. And i immediately assumed we had signed a forward from reading. That will teach me to believe anything the telegraph puts out there. To be honest I should of known better. Apologies to all.
The offal actually said 'attacking player' too and with his goal stats it was easy to have mistake him for a striker at first.
Or a replacement for Jones. Even better still. We didn't see enough of Andreu and this lad can play out wide.Reads as though he’s a replacement for Andreu, let’s hope he adds the MUCH needed creativity form midfield we have been severely lacking all season.
If the other signing is a winger, it still leaves us short in that position, but would still class it as decent business.
Unless of course Barratt will play on the wing.
Either way, a promising signing and so far none of the moaning re signing an ‘unproven 19 year old’.
However, the comparisons to Ponti are ridiculous.
I do love him already, but no, not yet.You want to shave him?
Oh, my bad it would appear. I got the headline “city sign Reading forward”
From the Coventry Telegraph. And i immediately assumed we had signed a forward from reading. That will teach me to believe anything the telegraph puts out there. To be honest I should of known better. Apologies to all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?