CJ_covblaze
Well-Known Member
Who's administrator was it?
Not sure the Trust should be promoting this sort of blatant anti ACL protesting , reminding everyone whos fault it was we lost 10 points.
Who's administrator was it?
Who's administrator was it?
You should remain impartial, all this 10 minute anti ACL stuff could backfire
We should clap at 60 minutes in recognition of all the funds SISU have put into the club.
I think you should.
I will..Right in your earhole
You go away as well ?
We should clap at 60 minutes in recognition of all the funds SISU have put into the club.
Can I ask why you would make such a statement?
Probably because he like me and many others know the trust is a publicity seeking bunch of nobody's.
No they are not you idiot. They are flawed but ultimately trying do do nothing but good in getting the club back to the Ricoh. Seeking publicity is quite a good thing if you want to , you know, publicise something. I have been critical of some of the actions they take but to insult the trust like that is really neanderthal. God help us if there were halfwits like you in charge.
Your still a brainless sisu supporting dimwit I see.
er okay then. I was actually making a point about the validity of the Sky Blue Trust. Not sure I mentioned SISU..perhaps it was hidden in the subtext or in my tone. Why dont you support the Trust then? I would genuinely like to know.
Because they are a self appointed bunch of people who took it upon themselves to claim they represent CCFC fans.
They claim to want a seat on the Board of CCFC and a say in the running of the Club.What are they? a group of some
1500 + fans with very little money and dreams of grandeur. They do not and never will represent me and a great many other long established fans.
Bit harsh. I certainly preferred them as rabble-rousing trouble makers to the neutral and kinda pointless entity that they've become, though.
The trust are there to air there members opinions if you are not a member then how can you expect to be represented join up have your say' maybe things can change in your favour until then put up or shut up..
As for self appointed how does that work when they were voted on by there members?
How many members voted? I was y even aware of a vote.
Because they are a self appointed bunch of people who took it upon themselves to claim they represent CCFC fans.
They claim to want a seat on the Board of CCFC and a say in the running of the Club.What are they? a group of some
1500 + fans with very little money and dreams of grandeur. They do not and never will represent me and a great many other long established fans.
Not one mention of any opposition to moving out of Coventry in trust statement, pathetic.
What a set of weak willed individuals they seem utterly afraid to upset anyone.
Because they are a self appointed bunch of people who took it upon themselves to claim they represent CCFC fans.
They claim to want a seat on the Board of CCFC and a say in the running of the Club.What are they? a group of some
1500 + fans with very little money and dreams of grandeur. They do not and never will represent me and a great many other long established fans.
I will..Right in your earhole
And your contribution is....?
Seriously, what do you want them to do? They are representative of our fanbase, who ALSO aren't sure what to do exactly.
Talks are on, JR is out, we wait. Unless you've got a better idea. And if you do I'd imagine the Trust board, as they have been (to a fault IMO), will take it seriously.
you wouldn't reach sonny.
No thanks... Would rather skin myself then roll around in sea salt than help the trust
Probably because he like me and many others know the trust is a publicity seeking bunch of nobody's.
Do you know anyone on the Sky Blue Trust Board?
No thanks... Would rather skin myself then roll around in sea salt than help the trust
Onye, fatty Clarke er Labovich. think thats it.
Problem is shhmmee that the Board hasn't consulted its members for months. Half a dozen of us submitted proposals to the last open meeting and wanted a vote but were told there couldn't be a vote because it was only an informal meeting. One of the proposals, big screen v Bradford, was done but on the other 3 more important issues there hasn't been a word. Basics seem to have broken down like no minutes of meetings and the trust email address doesn't seem to work. There have always been those who knock the trust but when someone like nonleagueherewecome calls the trust 'pointless' there really is a problem.
How many members voted? I was y even aware of a vote.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?