Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Jack Rudoni (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Apr 9, 2025
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
L

Legia Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #36
Robinshio said:
And was usually suspended for a quarter of the season
Click to expand...

It took him a while but by the end Hamer had cut out the silly bookings. Even so its a bit of a stretch to claim he was suspended for a quarter of the season.
 

Gibbo

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #37
Bigelvesy said:
Fuck sake, offered so little is bizarre.
I swear our fans pay not attention to what the opposition do in a game its madness
Click to expand...
He is supposed to be a midfield playmaker who uses the ball very constructively rather than just pass it backwards every single time.

You can't afford a wholly defensive tackling midfielder - it leaves it all to Rudoni. Sheaf got into some interesting places on the left in the second half although iirc no actual shooting chance came from them (MVE?)

As always judgements are mainly being directed by the result (see Player Ratings every single game). Had Pompey got that one off the bar, suspect Grimes would have been in for a heap of shit
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #38
Agree with player if the season comments. Quality player and works hard. Poor delivery last night…until the moment of magic
 
Reactions: covcity4life

Marty

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #39
Rudoni has had a great season, looked a bit shaky early on, but you could see he was a really talented player, he's offered far more and been a big upgrade on O'Hare, I just can't see him moving this summer, I just don't think one of the prem teams will be willing pay the sort of money we would want to let him go.

If we need money to upgrade elsewhere, then I could see MVE and Wright both attracting the money we would need to let them leave.
 
Reactions: shmmeee

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #40
Ccfcisparks said:
If we dont go up I'm worried about him going.
Click to expand...

We won't be actively looking to sell him, no chance after 1 year. Just doesn't fit how we've been doing things recently. Maybe someone will come in with a ridiculous offer but we are under no pressure and will know his value and potential if he has another great season next year
 
Reactions: CV3SkyBlue

chickentikkamasala

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #41
Legia Sky Blue said:
Didn't like Tim Sherwood suggesting PL sides should be looking at him as a 'cheap' signing in the Summer.
Click to expand...
Sherwood may be right about him being a premiership player by this summer

with us!
 

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #42
Wasn’t there a game when an assist got taken off him or something or a goal got disallowed

would have put him top.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #43
Matt smith said:
Wasn’t there a game when an assist got taken off him or something or a goal got disallowed

would have put him top.
Click to expand...

Simms took one off him with a toe poke to BTA. But then one of his is a 50:50 challenge that fell to Eccles so swings and roundabouts.
 
Reactions: Matt smith
S

sotvtoday

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #44
Matt smith said:
Wasn’t there a game when an assist got taken off him or something or a goal got disallowed

would have put him top.
Click to expand...
Blackburn away I think.
 
Reactions: Matt smith

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #45
I said it from the off an upgrade on O'Hare (even if not Hamer).
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #46
Matt smith said:
Wasn’t there a game when an assist got taken off him or something or a goal got disallowed

would have put him top.
Click to expand...
Goal was given as an own goal as well
 

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #47
Would just like to share some honkers with the group

Winny the Bish said:
I think we could do better. Especially if the fee is over £2-3m.
Click to expand...

Perennial Lurker said:
I tend to agree , he flatters to decieve and his end product hasn't been great so far in his career.
I trust MR and AV to improve him however
Click to expand...

Trueskyblue20 said:
Bit of anticlimactic if I’m honest especially when we’ve been linked to Stamenic (granted I only heard of him about 10 days ago) and Browne for that position. Whilst I think it is a decent acquisition, it doesn’t fill me with a lot of excitement but I’m happy to be proven wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

shmmeee said:
£5m for a L1 player again though…

cant help but feel we could have spent £35m a bit more efficiently.
Click to expand...

AFCCOVENTRY said:
So far it’s been a meh with Rudoni’s performances. In pre-season he looked good and the signs were good for the start.

In the games so far he hasn’t impressed. What is his position? What’s his role? He looks lost in the 10 role.

Another one where we expected a bit more.
Click to expand...

SeaSeeEffCee said:
I thought we’d massively overpaid when the fee was announced, came round on him big time in pre-season and now cooled on him again. Oxford game aside he’s offered very little and his off the ball work is miles behind O’Hare’s.
Click to expand...

procdoc said:
He’s ineffective. Spent a lot of money on him as well
Click to expand...

SlowerThanPlatt said:
He’s reminding me of Lameiras so far
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: procdoc, Matt smith, SIR ERNIE and 3 others

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #48
robbiekeane said:
Would just like to share some honkers with the group
Click to expand...

Usual suspects?
 
Reactions: Gynnsthetonic

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2025
  • #49
robbiekeane said:
Would just like to share some honkers with the group
Click to expand...
Anticlimactic compared to Stamenic and Alan fucking Browne is the best one
 
Reactions: Perennial Lurker and Shannerz
P

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • #50
To be fair at the time of my comment he hadn't settled in . Was very hasty in hindsight
 
Reactions: chickentikkamasala
B

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • #51
Gibbo said:
He is supposed to be a midfield playmaker who uses the ball very constructively rather than just pass it backwards every single time.

You can't afford a wholly defensive tackling midfielder - it leaves it all to Rudoni. Sheaf got into some interesting places on the left in the second half although iirc no actual shooting chance came from them (MVE?)

As always judgements are mainly being directed by the result (see Player Ratings every single game). Had Pompey got that one off the bar, suspect Grimes would have been in for a heap of shit
Click to expand...
 
P

procdoc

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • #52
robbiekeane said:
Would just like to share some honkers with the group
Click to expand...
Yep I own that one!
 

eyesee

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • #53
could very easily have had a goal the other night as well. header narrowly wide.
would be nice if he bagged a couple more goals, but i think that will come.
great signing.
 
Reactions: Gynnsthetonic, dadgad and wingy
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?