SimonGilbert
Telegraph Tea Boy
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/high-court-showdown-between-sisu-6948320
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Awesome
Hope it is the same judge!!
Awesome
Hope it is the same judge!!
Awesome
Hope it is the same judge!!
why? you want another sisu win? surprising.
Were you at the last one?
why? you want another sisu win? surprising.
They did not win anything. The result was claim not upheld, counter claim dismissed after a short time.
No damages/costs payable by either party.
So are you saying Higgs were right to bring an action that ultimately they were ruled against and that SISU owed them no money? Really think of the legal costs and think of the children.
Nice to see you leaping in with both feet though.
I wish sisu hadn't lodged the counter claim - which was clearly just a strategy - as then you'd really have nowhere to go with this would you?
Same judge for the Higgs proceedings.
I felt the judge would not accept lies or propaganda. He would slice through the rubbish.
He very quickly came to a clear, rational and fair decision accepted by all
What happens when a charity seeks legal advice about a debt owed?
Can they ignore the advice?
why? you want another sisu win? surprising.
What happens when a charity seeks legal advice about a debt owed?
Can they ignore the advice?
They did not win anything. The result was claim not upheld, counter claim dismissed after a short time.
No damages/costs payable by either party.
Mike obrien????
What I don't get with this, do the same people advise AND represent? ie couldn't a lawyer advise them to take it to court, after all they are getting paid silly money for being in court.
counter claim was a bonus sisu went for
the main claim was brought forward by higgs and they lost.
Agree completely
So you were there? Interesting.
Expensive bonus to get thrown out then given they each paid their own costs and for at least the first day (when the counterclaim was heard) Sisu had 8 on their legal team.
Sorry thought you asking if I was there, as in to say how can I say I want the same judge if I wasn't there. So I was explaining what i liked about him to quantify my comment.
I wasn't there, but I could see why that would be intriguing if I was.
Ah you mean Mrs Justice Thirlwall who granted the JR? I would hope that the judge whoever they are, will look at the facts and hear evidence before making a decision. The fact that a JR is granted doesn't imply wrong doing by the defendants, that's what a JR is there to determine.
Ahh I thought you said you were. Sorry.
Yes, I'd rather a no nonsense down the line judge.
As it was a case that could have gone to a regular Claims court ,you have to question why ?
No I mean Mr Justice Leggatt
Sorry my post was referring to Sisu winning their appeal to get a JR and the judge who granted it. Higgs case was a 'nil all draw'.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?