Geographically, the temple is slap bang in between two areas, one being a mosty Sikh area and one a mostly Muslim area. No idea if it is some turf war or something, but I do know that just up that street there were anti-terror raids carried out about a month or two ago.
Undertaking unauthorised expenditure on activities and failing to take adequate steps to address the risks posed to charity’s assets.
1. The trustees have failed to work collectively and to implement agreed decisions.
“2. They have also failed to make decisions which are in the interests of the charity only.
“3. The trustees have failed to manage charity property responsibly or in accordance with agreed policies and procedures.
True, I guess people will know more about it. I don't see what ISIS have to do with:
Surely you just don't let the people preaching ISIS and extremism in? Just get an intercom system fitted or something.
Surely they are trying to convert the Sikhs to a completely different religion? The same as if they went into a Church or a Synagogue and tried it? The minute they start going on about allah and mohammed they would stand out like a sore thumb?
Must admit I don't know much about the Sikh religion etc, but the couple of Sikhs I have known that if anything goes off (whether it's people kicking off or people struggling) then they do chip in and are very tight knit communities.
Am I reading it right that it was something to do with the charity commission and loads of accusations about a few things:
Commission issues warning to Sikh temple after police called to disturbances
Seems a bit strange. Surely if the police get called out every week to ISIS trying to take over and violence and threats it would have been swarming with armed police and terror squads?
Lesson 1 - CC4L isn't your typical Sikh, they're generally normal, well balanced people.
It's still random why they would rock up to a Sikh Temple to push Muslim Extremism? Unless there is a form of Sikh Extremism they were trying to push and get across? I always thought Sikhs and Muslims didn't get on.
What an odd story. Although its in the CT so how much of it is accurate is up for debate.
Seems to me the Sikhs did not do a lot wrong here. Some ISIS nutters tried to attempt to take over so they got the police involved and the takeover was unsuccessful.
The stuff from the charity commission seems a bit harsh unless there's some major details missing from the story or two stories are being merged together.
There was a story yesterday about the charity stuff that didn't mention isis I don't think online.sounds like 2 stories merged to me to make one confusing one.
Edited it out then! Bit cheekyJust says extremists (now)
He'll have a book out about it soon no doubt.
I blame the nazis or is it nazi's or nazi?
Or shall we use the name National Socialists for historic accuracy?
I blame the nazis or is it nazi's or nazi?
Or shall we use the name National Socialists for historic accuracy?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?