Grendel
Well-Known Member
Look in the mirror
There is NO difference between a 250 year lease and freehold. Tell me the differences, educate me I am clearly mistaken.
para 1, I haven't mentioned any sound bites, I mentioned they had said they were open to offers, they were, so not really swallowing any lies there was I?
para 2, They are different things, hence the different terms, you'd have to ask Joy why she was so bothered about freehold. Of course if she had the freehold she would still need to buy ACL.
para 3, I'll entertain the idea that the Council approached wasps, this doesn't change the fact they invited offers, this constant assertion doesn't fail to acknowledge anything.
para 4, the community asset references were always about the freehold, it seems we won't ever agree about that argument. The loan answers would be of interest to many people, not sure we have any right at present to know though. When accounts are filed it should become clearer, obviously this will take a while.
Para 5, I've questioned many things. I didn't assume sold out I wrote that that's what the website said red meant, you shouldn't assume so much.
Look in the mirror
There is NO difference between a 250 year lease and freehold. Tell me the differences, educate me I am clearly mistaken.
The look in the mirror remark doesn't really work, you accused me of assuming, I said it back, do the rules of comeback allow a repeat?
I've told you before, but here's one, a lease allows you to operate from a building, the freehold gives you ownership of the building. Owning the freehold would not allow CCFC any income, owning ACL and the lease does.
So the building can't be demolished and rebuilt as something else - are you sure? You see I think the freehold gives you the land and not the building at all. I lease land from the council and given normal permission laws regarding planning can do anything I want with it.
Yes I'm sure.
You can lease land, you can lease land and buildings. ACL are leasing the building, and I assume some of the land.
From what you have written it looks like you lease the land and not buildings, so this would be different, but if you want me to have a look into it for you let me know.
Well Lucas did let slip that all maintenance rights of the building are passed to Wasps - which is exactly the same as I have. This is a commercial lease remember not a private one.
Still you clearly have details of the lease made between wasps and the council so yes please provide concrete (ha ha) evidence that they cannot alter the building -- I suggest you first prove the building has a 250 year lifespan
There is NO difference between a 250 year lease and freehold. Tell me the differences, educate me I am clearly mistaken.
Well Lucas did let slip that all maintenance rights of the building are passed to Wasps - which is exactly the same as I have. This is a commercial lease remember not a private one.
Still you clearly have details of the lease made between wasps and the council so yes please provide concrete (ha ha) evidence that they cannot alter the building -- I suggest you first prove the building has a 250 year lifespan
It can last forever .... Just like Triggers broom !!
Go on - what is triggers broom? Why am I even asking.
You really ain't lived have you.
Look in the mirror
There is NO difference between a 250 year lease and freehold. Tell me the differences, educate me I am clearly mistaken.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?