Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

In sickness and in health (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Paxman II
  • Start date Aug 22, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

DazzleTommyDazzle

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2013
  • #71
Noggin said:
If they had made it legal though they weren't getting what they wanted, there is of course a very simple solution to that, for sisu to sign an agreement giving them what they wanted at the same time as acl sign the original cva. This solution is so damn obvious that it shows either sisu weren't willing to accept the 150k offer or the 150k wasn't really an offer.

I feel like sisu are the problem because they could easily have said we are willing to drop the JR and sign a 10 year lease at 150k a year but we can't do it as part of a cva (assuming appleton is correct with that), the fact they didn't say that suggests they weren't willing too.

For me though it's irrelevant, sisu are almost completely to blame even if the 150k offer wasn't legit as we know the 400k one was, the 400k one is more than fair and infinitely superior for everyone involved, the fans, sisu and acl compared to what we have now.

The thing that is so ridiculous is that even if sisu really planned to build a stadium and only planned to play in the rioch for say 4 years of a 10 year lease signing it and having to pay 6 years at 400k while not using it is still massively superior to the option they have chosen. which to me can only mean they are still planning to win by distressing acl into giving in.
Click to expand...

Quite correct in my view.
 

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2013
  • #72
Deleted member 5849 said:
I'll grant you your pedantry as I'd probably do the same

Doesn't alter my general point however, that their refusal to change their proposal (and their dogmatic refusal to talk directly with Fisher) suggests an attempt to make an offer that is not actually an offer.

In the PR stakes, an offer that can't be accepted is a rather good tactic...
Click to expand...

You might be correct on a technical point of legality, I'm not qualified to contradict. However knowing the offer were there, by fair or foul means for 150 k per annum why would fisher, sisu, waggot, sepala etal not have counter exploited by publically accepting the offer, calling acl's bluff (if indeed it was?)
It is less than the reported northampton fee, would have kept ccfc in coventry and have prevented moderates like me from being alienated to a point that my 35 year tenure as a season ticket holder is extinguished.

I will tell you why. Sisu have one and only one agenda.
Stadium acquisition.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 25, 2013
  • #73
Why not indeed? You'd think they would indeed have said they were more than happy to take that deal for five years while they build a stadium. It's the natural thing for them to do, and slightly curious they didn't.

Them not doing that and them being disingenuous, murky and dubious doesn't autmoatically make the other side right however. Unfortunately this is a world where both sides appear to be doing their best to be disengenuous and murky!
 
R

RPHunt

New Member
  • Aug 25, 2013
  • #74
Deleted member 5849 said:
The fact the offer could never be accepted even if they wanted to, as it didn't comply with the law.
Click to expand...

Care to expand on what law would have been broken?
 

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2013
  • #75
Deleted member 5849 said:
Why not indeed? You'd think they would indeed have said they were more than happy to take that deal for five years while they build a stadium. It's the natural thing for them to do, and slightly curious they didn't.

Them not doing that and them being disingenuous, murky and dubious doesn't autmoatically make the other side right however. Unfortunately this is a world where both sides appear to be doing their best to be disengenuous and murky!
Click to expand...

Slightly curious...?

You get my vote for the most understated analysis of the year...
Please open your eyes.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?