As a club we're 60 million in debt, we're about to lose 9000 paying customers, build a new ground approx 25 million, rent another ground for 3 years so in my head that's the best part of 100 million we'll be in debt by the time the new ground is open. Obviously their is plenty of expenditure I've missed but I'm really struggling to work out how being 100 million in debt is of benefit to anyone. What income streams would we have apart from rotten pie sales on top of season tickets and match day revenue are sisu thinking are going to come in to service this debt? I'm baffled
Hmmm, well, I think Charlton had just a few more fans than we have left....so those figures would be , err, slightly optimistic, to say the least!He used Charlton as an example, they made £700k in food and beverages a year, sisu were offered £100k by acl. Remember as well this is with Fishers spin on it. So all this is for £600k a year.
I think its pretty easy to see if it makes sense!
They probably turned over £700k inc non matchdays, more crap from Fisher.He used Charlton as an example, they made £700k in food and beverages a year, sisu were offered £100k by acl. Remember as well this is with Fishers spin on it. So all this is for £600k a year.
I think its pretty easy to see if it makes sense!
He used Charlton as an example, they made £700k in food and beverages a year, sisu were offered £100k by acl. Remember as well this is with Fishers spin on it. So all this is for £600k a year.
I think its pretty easy to see if it makes sense!
We were offered the food and drink but the council wanted £24m for the privilege!
What you mean like the Ricoh?Plus I think they are on about wantin to commercially develop the surrounding land to make it largely self financing....
He used Charlton as an example, they made £700k in food and beverages a year, sisu were offered £100k by acl. Remember as well this is with Fishers spin on it. So all this is for £600k a year.
I think its pretty easy to see if it makes sense!
To be fair he took F&B's as one example, there are also other income that would be tapped into to - e.g. Selling the naming rights to the stadium, stands, etc.
To be fair he took F&B's as one example, there are also other income that would be tapped into to - e.g. Selling the naming rights to the stadium, stands, etc.
But just as some argue that companies such as Ricoh will part with a million a year due in large part to the football club; they also consider the attraction of the totality of the stadium's use, it's prestige and its location.
If its a small, football-only stadium in Brandon; then it's a whole lot less attractive. Someone will sponsor it; sure. But not at the rates that currently prevail
But he said the stadium would be called Highfield II. Your not suggesting that was just emotional blackmail on the fans are you??
Pretty certain the project is highfield 2. The stadium name would be given to the highest bidder. The primark stadium
But he said the stadium would be called Highfield II. Your not suggesting that was just emotional blackmail on the fans are you??
Way too national for a crappy stadium in the middle of nowhere. It'll be a local business, like the Roseycombe that'll bag the rights!
Christ please tell me this is a joke.
In the middle of nowhere? Like some disused gasworks in an e demographic area in a deprived city you mean?
But just as some argue that companies such as Ricoh will part with a million a year due in large part to the football club; they also consider the attraction of the totality of the stadium's use, it's prestige and its location.
If its a small, football-only stadium in Brandon; then it's a whole lot less attractive. Someone will sponsor it; sure. But not at the rates that currently prevail
More likely a CHOIR rather than RICOH.
One is adjacent to a major motorway, served by a major road adjoining. The other is - we understand - just outside of Binley Woods. You're not really going to compare are you? You've started a decent thread tonight. Take my advice, like a young cub with his first fire, watch over it whilst its still going, eh?
Well we're up shit creek then. Any new investor will need to pay £24m+ to compass to f&B's.
What you mean like the Ricoh?
How can you claim that? Fisher admitted tonight he'd never even bothered to speak with Compass. Couldn't see the worth in it. So where does that figure come from?
Well that's what compass paid, doubt they will want to sell at a loss.
Simple. We all boycott the food and drink stalls at the Ricoh. The club sells food and drink from the barrow at Tesco and in all the car parks of businesses around the Ricoh and we all buy stuff from them.
This Compass stuff is a commercial challenge that any competent business can get around with a bit of thought. I don't buy it , pardon the pun.
If they accept Fisher's concept and are fearful of losing a significant income; they may sell at a lower level. I mean, the distressed threat has to work once, doesn't it?
But how low? £20m? £18m? £15m?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?