I'm not enjoying CCFC playing at Sixfields.
I'm not enjoying CCFC having 50-70million debt.
I'm not enjoying CCFC paying Arvo 1.8million a year in interest.
I'm not enjoying that CCFC as it stands has no future !!
maybe one silver lining from all this we can see who has the club at heart. hopefully that can stop so much squabbling.
I'm not enjoying CCFC playing at Sixfields.
I'm not enjoying CCFC having 50-70million debt.
I'm not enjoying CCFC paying Arvo 1.8million a year in interest.
I'm not enjoying that CCFC as it stands has no future !!
basically because you blindly question anybody who disagrees with your opinion.as for michael if he wants to front a proposal to return coventry to the Ricoh he should keep as much of that proposal private until the other parties involved can
read or understand them fully.
so what was his reply ??
I don't get the issue with asking sensible questions about the rent offer. People just want to know if it is likely to be accepted or not. From the scant detail available I would say it will be rejected as would mean Sisu effectively paying the rent on the face of it. People just want to know what the fine detail is that may make the club take it seriously.
Waiting for confirmation that I can post it up.
Nick, yourself and a few others who have had meetings with ML and have his email address. Instead of trying to batter Michael why don't you show some bottle and contact ML directly and ask what the current situation is ???
because they would have to put there wooden spoons down and do something constructive.
so you want M,O to post detail of million pound deals , but you have to wait to get conformation weather you can post if M.L has email him with dates and times for a meeting , sorry mate just does not make any senceWaiting for confirmation that I can post it up.
because they would have to put there wooden spoons down and do something constructive.
Is asking somebody a yes or no question really battering them? Jesus nobody is being battered.
Ahh so you mean I contact ML, post up what he says and then you say "You are doing SISU's PR". I get what you did there.
Except Nick did email ML, so this looks a little silly.
so you want M,O to post detail of million pound deals , but you have to wait to get conformation weather you can post if M.L has email him with dates and times for a meeting , sorry mate just does not make any sence
because they would have to put there wooden spoons down and do something constructive.
so you want M,O to post detail of million pound deals , but you have to wait to get conformation weather you can post if M.L has email him with dates and times for a meeting , sorry mate just does not make any sence
Like i said to you in another thread, if you got as animated about the many dozens if not hundreds of questions sisu need to answer for their actions and in other cases lack of actions i could take you a lot more seriously.
when did anyone say you should post on here what ML tells you in a private email?
......
I agree but if it was private then why is he making statements and going to the CET?
i havent got that far in the thread yet. have any of the other critics or are they still looking for their wooden spoon rest?
Waiting for confirmation that I can post it up.
I don't think nick wants every single detail, just certain things. He knows you have to be careful about what's put on here. I don't understand how it doesn't make sense. It's about time people realised that blindly agreeing to stuff is part of the reason we're in this crap in the first place.
what? so ML can use email? no reason for him not to contact Micheal by email then is there?
while he's at it he can cc TF & JS in, then all the main players are in the loop. Someone has got permission fro JS havent they to say that they are willing to talk, we dont want another handshake on a deal situation only for it to be overturned from a higher force.
No the question was have you (Ml) e-mailed M.O with times and dates of when they can meet , and nick says he has to wait for comformation before he can post an answer to this question , but at the same time wants details posted of million pounds deals ???It does if you expect to get further responses.
All people are asking for is details before jumping to conclusions on whether the club should/will accept. If Michael can't give detail that is fine and he should say so. Then people would just have to wait and see but you can't criticize the club for rejecting if you don't know full details - would you not agree?
What do you want to know? Happy to ask.
so you want M,O to post detail of million pound deals , but you have to wait to get conformation weather you can post if M.L has email him with dates and times for a meeting , sorry mate just does not make any sence
Michael's already said he HAS emailed him!
I did receive an email this morning and replied "Great! Mark, please just email me details for meeting and I will share with colleagues". I have not as yet received a response.
Ok you asked what did i want you to ask M.L i said asked him if he has e-mailed M.O about a meeting (yes or no) was what i was looking for , you can not answer it ,fair enoughIf it was a private email between me and Michael with answers I would check to see if I could post it up but I gave him trying to PM Michael a long time ago as that just got ignored tooIf Michael was to PM me info about the questions then of course I wouldn't post it without checking that it was ok first.
I am not the type to start BCC'ing people into conversations without them knowing
Yes, but reading his latest post appears he has sent a reply to ML, unless there's another post I've missed. Protocol would appear the ball is in MLs court....
No the question was have you (Ml) e-mailed M.O with times and dates of when they can meet , and nick says he has to wait for comformation before he can post an answer to this question , but at the same time wants details posted of million pounds deals ???
Michael's already said he HAS emailed him!
Ok you asked what did i want you to ask M.L i said asked him if he has e-mailed M.O about a meeting (yes or no) was what i was looking for , you can not answer it ,fair enough
yes, i was replying to the post nick made about waiting for confirmation that he could post the reply from ML so I'm aware of that.
my point was that some were making out on another thread that MO should accept a phone call from ML presumably as ML hasn't been taught how to use an email yet as its still the 1980's.
turns out he can use an email so if he's serious about talking to KCIC and there backers why cant he send him an email and copy the relevant sisu people in so they can see at the same time how things are progressing, MO can reply to all and also copy in his backers so they to can see how things are progressing. Too simple?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?