Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

If Wasps publicly declared they wanted to buy CCFC (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter weecohawena
  • Start date Sep 20, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 9
Next
First Prev 2 of 9 Next Last

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #36
rondog1973 said:
Why would they move the club from a home where it should be?
Click to expand...

You mean like LONDON Wasps. I've capitalised the London there to give you a hint about my point.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman and Sick Boy

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #37
How are they buying it?

What's the plan for a stadium/rental deal on offer?

What will the debt level of the club be?

What experience does the board have in football?

What's the plan on the pitch?

You know, the same questions we'd ask of any owner.

Why the hell would Wasps want to buy us? Why would anyone want to buy us, but especially Wasps?
 
Reactions: stupot07, trevelfarandwide and Nick

rondog1973

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #38
fernandopartridge said:
How are you defining competence? Do you mean the economically driven move from their historic home?

It very much remains to be seen whether they will be judged competent. There is a long long way to go for Wasps, the signs seem good but we don't know enough about them to judge them as competent.
Click to expand...
In this instance they have demonstrated competence by successfully negotiating and obtaining a modern sports stadium. Sorry, but football and rugby fans are a different breed and whereas some objected to the move, not all did. A calculated gamble that looks to have paid off.

CCFC's USP is a football club representing the city of Coventry. Wasps don't have this which I think facilitated their move.
 
Reactions: martcov

rondog1973

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #39
Liquid Gold said:
You mean like LONDON Wasps. I've capitalised the London there to give you a hint about my point.
Click to expand...
I'm talking about Cov. Why would they move them from a home where it should be?
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #40
rondog1973 said:
I'm talking about Cov. Why would they move them from a home where it should be?
Click to expand...
Erm.. are you taking the piss? Because they moved the club they own now away from where it should be
 
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #41
As long as our incomings weren't siphoned off to the rugby team then yes - don't see an issue if we keep our stadium takings they keep theirs and we split outside of sports 50/50

Same with the football money.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Dal

rondog1973

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #42
Liquid Gold said:
Erm.. are you taking the piss? Because they moved the club they own now away from where it should be
Click to expand...
For what reason?
 

peeler

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #43
rondog1973 said:
In this instance they have demonstrated competence by successfully negotiating and obtaining a modern sports stadium. Sorry, but football and rugby fans are a different breed and whereas some objected to the move, not all did. A calculated gamble that looks to have paid off.

CCFC's USP is a football club representing the city of Coventry. Wasps don't have this which I think facilitated their move.
Click to expand...

Very True

Wasps are a brand, they don't represent a community, having said that they rely on the community for support but that's a different thing.

They've moved multiple times over the years.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Dal

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #44
rondog1973 said:
For what reason?
Click to expand...
Money. Being a hedge fund after all..
 
Reactions: Sick Boy

rondog1973

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #45
Liquid Gold said:
Money. Being a hedge fund after all..
Click to expand...
So Wasps, now based in Coventry, obtain the local football club and decide to move them elsewhere to make more money.

Is that what you are suggesting?
 
Reactions: martcov
S

Sky Blue Dal

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #46
Esoterica said:
If we keep the name and the shirt colour and detail a clear vision for the club, then reluctantly yes. It may be swapping 1 immoral hege fund for another but at least one is currently putting an effort into matchday experience.
Click to expand...

and make damn sure they keep the Ricoh seats sky blue as it was intended to be when it was built.
 

peeler

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #47
rondog1973 said:
So Wasps, now based in Coventry, obtain the local football club and decide to move them elsewhere to make more money.

Is that what you are suggesting?
Click to expand...

Although I disagree with the posters comments, I think he was referring the the Wasps move, nothing to do with CCFC being moved.

I don't think he worded it very well.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #48
peeler said:
Wasps are a brand, they don't represent a community,
Click to expand...

Only because of the name change....
 

peeler

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #49
Sky Blue Dal said:
and make damn sure they keep the Ricoh seats sky blue as it was intended to be when it was built.
Click to expand...

Wasps own the stadium, why wouldn't they want their own colours eventually.
There are two reason why the keep them sky blue 1/ So as not to antagonise 2/ Because it would cost them a small fortune to change them
 

WestEndAgro

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #50
Yes
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #51
As long as revenue was shared equally at the Ricoh why not. So long as we're not treated as the poor delinquent brother why would anyone who supports the team not the regime care?
 
Reactions: The Penguin

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #52
rondog1973 said:
So Wasps, now based in Coventry, obtain the local football club and decide to move them elsewhere to make more money.

Is that what you are suggesting?
Click to expand...

I'm suggesting there is a possibility of it. They have previous in doing so and you're well aware of it.

Get off this wind up, I'm not biting anymore
 
Reactions: Ian1779

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #53
Liquid Gold said:
Erm.. are you taking the piss? Because they moved the club they own now away from where it should be
Click to expand...

To a stadium that has a 240+ year lease on. If they do plan to move teams again it ain't going to be for a long long time and frankly it's scaremongering nonsense to suggest otherwise.
 
Reactions: rondog1973

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #54
skybluetony176 said:
To a stadium that has a 240+ year lease on. If they do plan to move teams again it ain't going to be for a long long time and frankly it's scaremongering nonsense to suggest otherwise.
Click to expand...

There is recent evidence of stadiums in London being basically given away. Would that not be tempting to owners who's only motivation is profit?
 

shelby76

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #55
Fucking hell this is a comedy! Ok lads get in the shower pass the soap around when they have done with you! Getting desperate now, if the team was riding high i would be confident it would happen.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #56
Liquid Gold said:
Erm.. are you taking the piss? Because they moved the club they own now away from where it should be
Click to expand...

What you don't seem to understand is that the landscape of rugby & football are very different.

There are professional football clubs everywhere, the territory is very crowded, there are not many gaps in coverage and the FL has rules to prevent franchise operations which were introduced after MK franchised Wimbledon (and BTW I will love it if MK falls below AFC).

Rugby has many fewer professional clubs, considerable geographic gaps and is organised on a UK basis (England/Scotland/Wales are not different associations).
Professional rugby is also relatively new it has only been going 20 odd years, so its hardly surprising that it hasn't fully settled yet.
For those reasons there isn't the same level of opposition in rugby against franchising.. yet.. and the rugby authorities don't object, so it happens.
 
Reactions: rondog1973 and shmmeee

rondog1973

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #57
Liquid Gold said:
I'm suggesting there is a possibility of it. They have previous in doing so and you're well aware of it.

Get off this wind up, I'm not biting anymore
Click to expand...
It's not a wind up!

It's a different circumstance and you know it.

Why would Wasps move a Coventry based team from Coventry when they own both stadium and club?
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #58
Sky Blue Dal said:
and make damn sure they keep the Ricoh seats sky blue as it was intended to be when it was built.
Click to expand...

With all our stay away fans who will come flocking back as soon as SISU leave, it won't matter what colour the seats are as they'll all have bums on!
 

peeler

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #59
Nick said:
Only because of the name change....
Click to expand...

A history lesson for Nick.

When they were formed in 1866 they were called Wasps, they only changed their name to London Wasps in 1999 and then back again to just Wasps in 2014.

So they have only been London Wasps for 15 years of their 150+ year existence. The reason they changed it to London Wasps was to differentiate between Wasps FC an amateur side.

Bizarrely, most of the time they were called London Wasps was when they were playing in High Wycombe, which last time I looked isn't in London.
 

The Reverend Skyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #60
Good god, we have had seven years with hedge fund owners that has seen us slip from higher Championship to the bottom of league one, chaos on and off the pitch, loss of everything we own, and yet some supporters are willing to get into bed with different hedge fund owners.
Sorry to swear but that's fucking maddening and breathtakingly stupid.
It wouldn't just be Wasps anyway, it would be Wasps with the council behind them telling them what to do. That's just what we want isn't it.
 
Reactions: Sick Boy

Nick

Administrator
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #61
peeler said:
A history lesson for Nick.

When they were formed in 1866 they were called Wasps, they only changed their name to London Wasps in 1999 and then back again to just Wasps in 2014.

So they have only been London Wasps for 15 years of their 150+ year existence. The reason they changed it to London Wasps was to differentiate between Wasps FC an amateur side.

Bizarrely, most of the time they were called London Wasps was when they were playing in High Wycombe, which last time I looked isn't in London.
Click to expand...

So they didn't change their name just before they moved here?

It is simple, just change our name!
 
S

shy_tall_knight

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #62
Liquid Gold said:
There is recent evidence of stadiums in London being basically given away. Would that not be tempting to owners who's only motivation is profit?
Click to expand...
Genuinely interested what London stadiums have been given away recently
 

peeler

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #63
Nick said:
So they didn't change their name just before they moved here?

It is simple, just change our name!
Click to expand...

They did indeed, but they changed it back to their original name which prior to 1999 was just Wasps RFC.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #64
shy_tall_knight said:
Genuinely interested what London stadiums have been given away recently
Click to expand...

The Olympic stadium in context has been given away. £701m of public money spent. West Ham will pay £2.5m for 99 years (£247.5m + £15m).

Compared to the Ricoh, £10m from the council and £9.5m from the Regional Development Agency (ERDF + AWM match funding). ACL paid £21m for the lease which basically repaid these costs.
 
Reactions: montydon87
S

shy_tall_knight

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #65
fernandopartridge said:
The Olympic stadium in context has been given away. £701m of public money spent. West Ham will pay £2.5m for 99 years (£247.5m + £15m).

Compared to the Ricoh, £10m from the council and £9.5m from the Regional Development Agency (ERDF + AWM match funding). ACL paid £21m for the lease which basically repaid these costs.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't call £250m - a give away and way outside WASPs reach
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #66
The Premiership club were invited in as partners by the landowners, Legal & General, and the local Hertsmere Borough Council, with a 15,000-seater stadium worth £22 million and a hotel on site for added revenue. But Wasps wanted to own and control it. End of deal.
Click to expand...

Maybe we can move down there?
 

peeler

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #67
Nick said:
Maybe we can move down there?
Click to expand...

If SISU remain in charge a 15K stadium would be far too big.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #68
shy_tall_knight said:
Wouldn't call £250m - a give away and way outside WASPs reach
Click to expand...

Even then I don't think that they've been given it. Pretty sure it's not so dissimilar from our original Ricoh deal. I.e. they have use of the bowl during the season, office's and shop on site. Anything else going on is nothing to do with them IIRC. Although they do get a share of the naming rights as West Hams presence is recognized as an added benefit to that deal for which they are rewarded.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #69
If this happened we would be the biggest laughing stock in English football and some fans wouldn't even be able to work out why.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman and Ian1779

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2016
  • #70
shy_tall_knight said:
Wouldn't call £250m - a give away and way outside WASPs reach
Click to expand...
They aren't paying £250m up front, they're paying £2.5m pa, which is pretty much the same as the level of interest wasps are paying per annum on the bonds.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 9
Next
First Prev 2 of 9 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?