Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

If Fans of Other Clubs ask me 'Why did KCIC start the Petition'? (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter lamtara2006
  • Start date Feb 7, 2014
Forums New posts
L

lamtara2006

Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #1
My own views entirely etc. CCFC Fans all know the story, this is posted for non Sky Blues Fans to access via Twitter.

The Demise of Coventry City Football Club

Back in the mid-1990s Coventry City were financially stable, the perennial ‘houdini’ club of football with only Arsenal, Everton and Liverpool having stayed longer in the top flight for a continuous spell.

In the late nineties, CCFC Directors had grandiose dreams for the club which outweighed their business sense and started to spend on player’s transfer fees and wages at a rate that far exceeded the income the club received. One of these dreams was to leave Highfield Road with a capacity of 23,000 for a much larger stadium, a strange decision you might think as Highfield Road was only sold out 2-3 times per season. Eventually, this was to see the club move into the magnificent Olympic-standard Ricoh Arena in 2005.

However, before a single piece of earth was turned on the construction project, the risks taken by the Directors had put the club into real financial crisis. The money that would be raised from the sale of Highfield Road had been squandered and when the club was relegated into the 2nd tier in 2001, there were reportedly debts of £60million.

Coventry City Council stepped in at this point to rescue the new stadium project and funded the construction at a total cost of £113million. Coventry City would therefore have their new home, however the Club Directors were in a weak negotiating position and the terms of the lease were very steep. Although the football club paid an annual rent of £1.3 million + covering match day expenses, Coventry City did not enjoy any of the match day revenues apart from ticket and merchandising sales; the club was deprived of the benefits from food and beverage, car-parking etc. and any profits from other events such as conferences, concerts and the hotel and casino which were part of the complex.

In 2007 Coventry City FC were on the brink of going into Administration. At the last minute, Sisu Capital, a London-based Hedge Fund with investment operations sheltered on the Cayman Islands, arrived on the scene and bought the club. A lot of big promises were made about re-investment in the football team to bring about a return to the Premier League but little was delivered and in 2012 the club was again relegated to League One.

Following relegation, the owners declared that the terms of the lease for the Ricoh Arena were unacceptable for a League One Club and stopped paying the rent with immediate effect to force a re-negotiation. This is despite the fact that the lease was legally binding and although Sisu had not been the original signatories they had effectively accepted the terms when they bought the club. The ‘rent strike’ continued for almost 12 months and although the landlords offered significantly reduced rent to reach a settlement, Sisu refused to accept.

In March 2013, with court decisions in place in favour of the landlords, the owners put Coventry City Football Club into Administration before the creditors could do the same. They also announced that the club would be leaving the Ricoh and would seek an alternative venue for home games for the 2013/14 season, although the team were permitted to complete fixtures for the last season at the Ricoh.

Eventually, it was announced that the new venue would be at Sixfields, home of Northampton Town, 35 miles from Coventry. This move was sanctioned by the Football League for a period of 3 to 5 years, despite vociferous protests from supporters groups.

Just before the current season began, the Football League also agreed to the transfer of the ‘Golden Share’ which confers rights to be a member of the League to a different operating company, also owned by Sisu. So the same people who put the club into Administration were now back in control of the football club having bought the relevant assets from the Administrator. Again, the majority of supporters were totally dismayed at this turn of events.

Attendances at Sixfields for ‘home’ games average around 2,000 compared to 10,000 in League One at the Ricoh. For some it is impractical to attend, for most of us it is an active decision not to attend and our boycott extends to not purchasing any club merchandise, a campaign known as ‘Not One Penny More’ until we are playing back at the Ricoh, or for some until Sisu have exited from the club. This is a hard choice as we know that an economic weapon hurts the team we love but it is the only effective tool that we have to use against owners who are destroying OUR club. The sad irony for supporters is that while this is going on, the team are playing the most attractive and successful football seen for at least 15 years. This partly explains why the away following has been massive by comparison: 7,000 at MK Dons; a 5,000 sell-out at the Emirates for a televised game on a Friday night (could have been 8,000 if CCFC had taken the full allocation); and 3,000 will go to Notts County on Saturday, weather permitting.

Supporters have been betrayed by the club’s owners; for many people the City Council are considered to have some share of the blame; former Directors certainly have much to answer for; and the Football League has failed us totally by not acting to regulate properly in this matter, partly because their rules are inadequate, partly through incompetence and largely because they place the interests of club owners and their own self-interest far above the wishes of the mass of supporters.

With no sign of a resolution in sight, the ‘Keep Cov[entry] in Cov[entry]’ campaign has launched a petition on the Parliamentary web-site called ‘Without Fans there is No Football’. It calls on the Select Committee for Culture, Media and Sport to re-open its inquiry into Football Governance following an ultimatum that they issued in January 2013 to the Governing Bodies – FA, Premier League, Football League etc. – to bring about self-reform in the interests of supporters within 12 months or face legislation to enforce appropriate changes. Since that report was issued, the whole Coventry City saga has erupted so we are asking for it to be used as a case-study to demonstrate the manifest failings in governance procedures. But we are not alone …. Cardiff City, Hull City and most recently Leeds United fans can all claim that they are being let down by football governing bodies who support owners against the demands of fans - dare I say customers! - on every occasion. By far the largest group of participants in the national game – the paying supporters – is mostly ignored by those who should be standing up for us.

Please support this petition http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/59884and ask friends, relatives and fellow football supporters to do the same. We need to get 100,000 signatures within 12 months in order for Parliament to take notice but really we need to do this much quicker to be effective. Over the first week we are exceeding 1,000 signatures per day and I expect we will get to 10,000 by tonight which is brilliant: but there is still a long way to go to reach our objective. The petition is not just about Coventry City, its concerns are rooted in the loss of football’s soul and has the well-being of all our clubs at heart. We have the backing of the Football Supporters Federation and MP’s from both sides of Parliament among many others. Please bear in mind that if this can happen to Coventry City it could be your club next.
 

blueflint

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #2
pretty much spot on good summarisation
 
C

Cheshire Sky Blue

New Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #3
That's as good a synopsis as I have seen on here. Cant wait for RFC et al to pitch in.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #4
Pretty much spot on but would say that deprived of income for non football related areas, like casino etc is the wrong word to use as it impliess they are entitled to it.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #5
Does NoPM still exist?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #6
torchomatic said:
Does NoPM still exist?
Click to expand...

Are there still people not buying tickets and merchandise?
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #7
shmmeee said:
Are there still people not buying tickets and merchandise?
Click to expand...

It's been said many times, and I know you are biting to a silly comment, but I'm not buying merchandise or tickets but it's not because of NOPM.
It's because I don't want a shit polyester shirt that sets on fire if you move too quickly and I don't want to watch us play in Northampton.
 
L

lamtara2006

Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #8
italiahorse said:
Pretty much spot on but would say that deprived of income for non football related areas, like casino etc is the wrong word to use as it impliess they are entitled to it.
Click to expand...

Fair point. The message I was trying to get over was that the tenancy arrangement could have been more lucrative for the club if the Directors had negotiated from a stronger position or indeed had been able to build the Ricoh complex as originally planned.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #9
hill83 said:
It's been said many times, and I know you are biting to a silly comment, but I'm not buying merchandise or tickets but it's not because of NOPM.
It's because I don't want a shit polyester shirt that sets on fire if you move too quickly and I don't want to watch us play in Northampton.
Click to expand...

To be honest I'm the same, I started buying from away clubs, but now I'm not so bothered. Don't want the shirt 'cos it's shit IMO and won't step foot in Sixfields.

Just saying that surely as long as there's people not giving "one penny more" then it's still going. I've always found it a little silly that it's spoken about by some as some form of official group when it merged into KCIC and was dropped IIRC. The OP's post only mentions it as a name for a strategy some are taking. In that sense it still exists as long as someone is doing it.
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #10
NOPM does still exist - Its down to personal choice whether you want to brandish it X Y or Z.

Officially it is a "strategy" ...... not a specific way of life you must follow.
 

blueflint

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #11
i support nopm i won't ever go sixfields or buy from the club shop or web site
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #12
I wasn't part of NOPM until they decided to sue a charity. I then decided that I wasn't going to help them fund it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?