Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Idiots (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter 1966skyblue
  • Start date Jan 28, 2017
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • …
  • 21
Next
First Prev 13 of 21 Next Last

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #421
oldskyblue58 said:
Cheers CVD. Think it is important that the unemotional facts are focused on. What happened yesterday will be used by the owners directors and certain media to discredit the fans protests and the organisations behind them. It will help them keep opposition to Sisu divided and to ignore any proposed alternative ownership
Click to expand...
It plays into fishers hands. He will have his material for the next interview.
 
Reactions: oldskyblue58

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #422
Nick said:
No, it was only about the pension discussion. I'd go to the doctors if that distracted you.
Click to expand...
Pension discussion? It was Grendel hoping that I had a personal pension and didn't know where the money was invested so he could imply that it was in a hedge fund.
 
Reactions: cloughie
M

Monners

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #423
At the moment I am not going to the semi. I don't want to stand there and witness what I did yesterday.
 
Reactions: Dazmataz, trevelfarandwide and stupot07

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #424
Grendel said:
No it sounds right. The bodies you mention though should I believe actually make a statement regarding it and say they condemn the behaviour. If they don't the semi final is likely to spiral out of control and if they get to the final I am sure it will all go very badly.
Click to expand...
I don't blame the trust for yesterday, I'm usually quick to jump on but they have made statements in the last week saying don't go on the pitch.

Agree about the other statement, it needs to be made clear that things like fines aren't coming out of joys pocket.

Maybe a little bit of indirect guidance or something, explain how it doesn't help ccfc, it won't hurt sisu.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #425
Monners said:
At the moment I am not going to the semi. I don't want to stand there and witness what I did yesterday.
Click to expand...
Can I have your ticket please?
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #426
Astute said:
Pension discussion? It was Grendel hoping that I had a personal pension and didn't know where the money was invested so he could imply that it was in a hedge fund.
Click to expand...

Perhaps we could discuss which wealthy families have invested their money in SISU funds?

The only one I am aware SISU have any connection with is this one..
The Huntsman Connection
PS a number of wealthy people with connections to the Huntsman familiy are listed at the end of that article.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #427
Astute said:
Pension discussion? It was Grendel hoping that I had a personal pension and didn't know where the money was invested so he could imply that it was in a hedge fund.
Click to expand...

No it wasn't. All pension monies are invested in various funds and my point was that. I've got a final salary scheme and haven't got a clue where the individual funds are housed - as you also do not.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #428
Grendel said:
No it wasn't. All pension monies are invested in various funds and my point was that. I've got a final salary scheme and haven't got a clue where the individual funds are housed - as you also do not.
Click to expand...
Oh yes I do. We get a yearly statement telling us where the money is invested. And with the latest rules brought out none of it is allowed to be invested in high risk anything. Most of it has to be in minimal risk. As in bonds or similar.

Or don't you have a clue about final salary pensions?
 
Reactions: cloughie and lifelongcityfan

trevelfarandwide

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #429
Monners said:
At the moment I am not going to the semi. I don't want to stand there and witness what I did yesterday.
Click to expand...
Don't blame you, mate. In fact, this is getting near the tipping point as a fans community, I feel...we're almost afraid to witness the horror on-field, coupled with knowing what horrors are going on behind the scenes.

This is very nearly the pinnacle of our combined anger, frustration and sorrow, culminated over the last 16 years.
 

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #430
Cobbler1983 said:
I have genuine sympathy for the position you find yourselves in. I respect your right to protest, even if it disrupts the game, even it leads to a complete abandonment of the game. The situation is clearly desperate and the stakes are being raised. I don't know the exact goings on at your club but get the idea that someone is putting it's future at risk and I don't blame any of you for fighting hard against that. We had a bad owner very recently. We started to fight a bit, but ultimately we were very lucky that he left quickly with the law on his tail. No short memories here, I feel your pain.

Before today, the over whelming majority of reasonable minded Cobblers fans were sympathetic and many would have supported an organised protest of some kind if asked to as well. However, after today the majority of that support has shifted.

The trouble is that what happened today did not feel like a protest in the end. The flares being thrown initially, to chants of We Want Sisu Out I got. But then two lads who run onto the pitch and approach the ref and various players, clearly threatening violence, shortly after a red card has been given seems to have nothing to do with a protest. It was just thuggery.

Further pitch invaders again approached home areas with aggression and gestures stereotypically associated with football hooligans. How is that a protest? How does that support your cause?

An announcement is then made that if any more flares or pitch invasions happen the game will be abandoned. Order is then restored completely for the rest of the first half and the start of the second. Then the first goal goes in and suddenly flares rain onto the pitch as do supporters. Again, this had nothing to do with a protest and everything to do with trying to force the promised abandonment of a game you were now losing.

Trying to dress these acts up as a desperate protest just completely undermines your cause, and all efforts to gain positive publicity and garner support for it. If you want to get these people out, you need to be heard but you also need to win the argument.

I wish you every success in beating them. I genuinely do. We spoke with a number of Cov fans at the cup game last year and as with all clubs the majority are just sound, ordinary people and were very sympathetic to our plight then.

A successful campaign will need to unite and involve all of those decent, ordinary people and violence and intimidation will just alienate both your own fanbase and the rest of the football family.

For what it is worth, I think a complete boycott would be the best option. If literally nobody goes for half a dozen games they'll have to give in. Sadly it seems most football fans do not have the stomach for this though.
Click to expand...

I think that some of this is about perceptions. The first two lads who came on it seemed to me to be heading towards the directors box where Tim Fisher would have been sitting . The first of the two certainly seemed to be gesturing and mouthing things in that direction. If he had wanted simply to have a go at your fans, the more vociferous ones were in the area I was in which was adjacent to the away end. A shorter trip for him to make. I didn't see any threats made to any player or match official. As far as I am concerned anything violent would be out and I think most would agree with that. I had departed by the time the later flares were thrown so can't comment on those or other pitch invasions. I would say that from what I saw people were acting with their heart rather than their head. I don't believe that there was any concerted effort to get the game abandoned. I am sure that most would be aware of what happened at Blackpool and that any score when play stopped would be the final result.
The idea of getting in touch with fans of clubs we are visiting I think is a good one. However as you saw with the reaction of some Cobblers fans to our plight before any of the flares went on the pitch, a lot of opposing fans would not care less and would be unlikely to back a joint protest. With the exception of Charlton away and AFC Wimbledon at home I have seen very little evidence of sympathy from fans of other clubs. The other thing is that the authorities would be aware of any joint protest and would probably try to prevent it if they could.
With the exception of a few informed fans like yourself, I think fans of most clubs are still not really aware of what has gone on here. I think as a supporters group we are very much on our own. I would not want to alienate the fans of other teams or spoil their enjoyment of watching their team play. However, what is happening to us is a symptom of the way football as a whole is run. Things need to change so that clubs cannot be run into the ground on the whim of selfish owners like ourselves and Blackpool. Hopefully the more fuss that is made the more likely it is that the Government will become involved in the way that football is governed and made actually start to legislate to stop owners such as ours destroying community assets like football clubs.
 
Reactions: NortonSkyBlue, Wheelfass and lifeskyblue

hutch1972

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #431
Monners said:
At the moment I am not going to the semi. I don't want to stand there and witness what I did yesterday.
Click to expand...
So you won't be going to the Millwall game then ? I'm sure that will produce more disgusting and nauseating actions than what you witnessed yesterday.
As silly as it was , it was a few flares and half a dozen people on the pitch.
Maybe I seem a bit laid back about it all but I can't believe how much is being made over what in essence was a small demonstration.
 
Reactions: NortonSkyBlue and Wheelfass

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #432
Astute said:
Oh yes I do. We get a yearly statement telling us where the money is invested. And with the latest rules brought out none of it is allowed to be invested in high risk anything. Most of it has to be in minimal risk. As in bonds or similar.

Or don't you have a clue about final salary pensions?
Click to expand...

So where's yours invested in then? That's all I asked. I get statements of fund values and of final earnings at 65, death in service benefits, cash free sums, total fund value and penalty clauses for early settlement but not the specified funds the pension fund invests in. I'm surprised yours goes into the detail so where do they invest out of interest?

What sort of scheme is yours - a 39/50? It's important to know as the company can of course suspend the scheme at any time.

Out of interest what's your schemes approach to dependants?

Which act are you reverting to regarding security of investment? The last legislation was more concerned with fund withdrawal. This may be a route to go actually as dependant recovery is generally pretty poor.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #433
Astute said:
Oh yes I do. We get a yearly statement telling us where the money is invested. And with the latest rules brought out none of it is allowed to be invested in high risk anything. Most of it has to be in minimal risk. As in bonds or similar.

Or don't you have a clue about final salary pensions?
Click to expand...
Well as Grendel works for JLR maybe they brought a shed load of bonds from the Rugby team they sponser
 
Reactions: martcov, Captain Dart, Astute and 1 other person

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #434
Cobbler1983 said:
Days like yesterday and posts like the one above just make less tolerant people think well fuck you then. I hope your club does go to the wall.
Click to expand...
This is not the first time we've heard this from opposition fans. Would it not be sensible to listen and take things on board?
oldskyblue58 said:
Neither the Trust nor Jimmy Hills Way campaign organised or planned any form of protest for the game at sixfields and did not at any time encourage the use of smoke bombs or going on the pitch.

The actions that happened were planned and conducted by a small number of fans acting of their own accord.
Click to expand...
This goes back to what was said at the Trust meeting. The Trust and JHW have to be kept totally separate. That advice seems to have been ignored.

Its like the whistles, you can't one game be encouraging people to blow whistles and then act all surprised when the next game somebody blows a whistle. If you have a group calling for action then, no matter if they directly called for that action or not, when things take place they have to take a share of the responsibility. And of course we don't know who was behind the protest or who is involved in JHW, except for a couple of people, so how can anyone conclude they weren't involved.

Best way forward is for the Trust and JHW to be totally distanced from each other. The trust should put out a statement condemning the action, preferably without any childish digs in it, and then maintain a professional approach. Leave the protests to JHW.
 

joemercersaces

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #435
Grendel must have spoken to BBC Midlands News as a few minutes ago they said 9 fans had been arrested after hundreds invaded the pitch. They forgot to mention the fact that it was only by a miracle that a massacre was averted and that several babes in arms narrowly escaped incineration.
 
Reactions: NortonSkyBlue, Wheelfass and Astute

Great_Expectations

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #436
Monners said:
At the moment I am not going to the semi. I don't want to stand there and witness what I did yesterday.
Click to expand...

This is a really important point that shouldn't be overlooked. I'm sure a lot of people feel the same, especially the older generation or supporters with children.

Make the Ricoh intimidating for the opposition but not our own fans.

Protesting behind a cause is good, but outright thuggish behaviour is pathetic, proves nothing and actually distracts from the point.
 
Reactions: Monners

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #437
letsallsingtogether said:
Well as Grendel works for JLR maybe they brought a shed load of bonds from the Rugby team they sponser
Click to expand...

Guaranteed. Why do you think Grendull promotes them so much on here under the guise of slating them? It's obvious isn't it. He needs them to be successful to protect his pension
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #438
chiefdave said:
This is not the first time we've heard this from opposition fans. Would it not be sensible to listen and take things on board?
Click to expand...

Why? It's not like they're doing anything to help us. What do we have to lose by pissing of the fans of other teams?
 
Reactions: robbiethemole and cloughie

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #439
skybluetony176 said:
Guaranteed. Why do you think Grendull promotes them so much on here under the guise of slating them? It's obvious isn't it. He needs them to be successful to protect his pension
Click to expand...

If it was invested in such a Ponsi scheme I may end up having to sell up and live in Rugby.

To be fair I think I'm safe.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #440
Astute said:
Make your mind up.
Click to expand...

that's why this wanker has no credibity in anything he spouts
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #441
Broken Hearted Sky Blue said:
He right Tony they said to these guys look throw some smoke bombs on the pitch and then invade it. Dont worry all you'll get is a massive fine a criminal record and a banning order.
Click to expand...
well it's obvious if they said then do it after all we are all mindless fans
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #442
Grendel said:
If it was invested in such a Ponsi scheme I may end up having to sell up and live in Rugby.

To be fair I think I'm safe.
Click to expand...
They wouldn't want your type in Rugby, but then who would
 
Reactions: Astute

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #443
Grendel said:
If it was invested in such a Ponsi scheme I may end up having to sell up and live in Rugby.

To be fair I think I'm safe.
Click to expand...

A ponsi scheme? Is that anything like a ponzi scheme? At this rate you'll probably move to Rugeley thinking that you've moved to Rugby.
 
Reactions: martcov, cloughie, Astute and 1 other person

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #444
skybluetony176 said:
Why? It's not like they're doing anything to help us. What do we have to lose by pissing of the fans of other teams?
Click to expand...

Collective efforts of protest like the one at Charlton, seem to get a lot more air time and decent press coverage, than fucking off opposition fans and throwing a few flares on the pitch.
 
Reactions: martcov and stupot07

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #445
Grendel said:
If it was invested in such a Ponsi scheme I may end up having to sell up and live in Rugby.

To be fair I think I'm safe.
Click to expand...
You mean Rugby are safe
 
Reactions: martcov, Astute and skybluetony176

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #446
Moff said:
Collective efforts of protest like the one at Charlton, seem to get a lot more air time and decent press coverage, than fucking off opposition fans and throwing a few flares on the pitch.
Click to expand...
If you can get the opposing fans to join you.
Do you not think we have spoken to them.
We are always getting the word around this is a daily chore believe me they DON'T care, why should they half of our own don't care.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #447
skybluetony176 said:
Why? It's not like they're doing anything to help us. What do we have to lose by pissing of the fans of other teams?
Click to expand...
So why the hell are we having protests to raise awareness then? And if not to raise awareness, which is the usual reason given, what are the aims of the protest. Was anyone from SISU there yesterday, do you think they will even hear about what happens and if they do what difference will it make?
 
Reactions: stupot07

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #448
Moff said:
Collective efforts of protest like the one at Charlton, seem to get a lot more air time and decent press coverage, than fucking off opposition fans and throwing a few flares on the pitch.
Click to expand...

I don't know. Did the joint Blackpool Blackburn protest get more than a passing mention? It was very easy for the FL and FA to ignore too as it happened outside the stadium. We're at the stage where we need more direct action that the football authorities can't chose to ignore.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #449
letsallsingtogether said:
If you can get the opposing fans to join you.
Do you not think we have spoken to them.
We are always getting the word around this is a daily chore believe me they DON'T care, why should they half of our own don't care.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. I just thought the Charlton protest got some very good press coverage against SISU, but yes I take on board that a lot of clubs fans don't care, but I also thank you for trying to get them on board.
 
Reactions: martcov, letsallsingtogether and Rusty Trombone

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #450
skybluetony176 said:
I don't know. Did the joint Blackpool Blackburn protest get more than a passing mention? It was very easy for the FL and FA to ignore too as it happened outside the stadium. We're at the stage where we need more direct action that the football authorities can't chose to ignore.
Click to expand...

I guess the pigs were novel, and that got some good press, but as I appreciate from LAST not all opposition fans give a damn. I suppose like with Charlton, and Blackpool/Blackburn it helps when dealing with another club who have crap owners.
 
Reactions: skybluetony176 and Astute
T

theferret

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #451
All the faux outrage is a bit tiresome.

I agree, ideally we wouldn't take these sort of things on the road, and can understand NT fans being pissed off.

That said, we have to fight for our club. The alternative is to do nothing, sit on our hands and join in with those who stay at home and try and dress their apathy up as protest. People are angry. This shit matters, and some people will overstep the mark from time to time because they care, perhaps too much.

It hurts, and perhaps yesterday won't achieve anything, but I'd rather that than rolling over and submitting. Maybe a line was crossed yesterday, and we have to be careful, but I'm tired of the suck it and see approach. What has that achieved? Precisely nothing. We're as good as down, and if we fall foul of the authorities between now and the end of the season so what. We may be fined, and that ultimately will come out of the club's finances, but then given that most people have stated they won't be renewing their season ticket next season (including many who have condemned the protest), since when has that bothered us? What does it matter when pretty much everyone agrees we have no future anyway under the current owners.

The last thing I want is in a few years time, when there is no club, to look back and ask if we could have done more. To ask, did we fight hard enough? Did we go down with a fight or a whimper? Desperate times call for desperate measures. But yes, perhaps we have to be a bit cleverer in how we approach these things and repeated pitch invasions may not win friends and influence people. Understandable though? I'd say so.
 
Reactions: martcov, Deleted member 5849, Iancro and 9 others

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #452
chiefdave said:
So why the hell are we having protests to raise awareness then? And if not to raise awareness, which is the usual reason given, what are the aims of the protest. Was anyone from SISU there yesterday, do you think they will even hear about what happens and if they do what difference will it make?
Click to expand...

Your right what difference does it make?
But what does doing nothing do?

So if we just take it all on the state of the club now bottom of the table lose the next 2 games and we are fucked can't even afford to draw.
Fans disappearing in droves supporters turning there backs on attending next season, will Sisu get to hear about that or will they just keep walking around blindfolded and wearing ear defenders?

Will Joy say "where is all the money being spent" when they go to her and say look we need to move back to Sixfields as we have no home, and they want the Rent up front, and we have no one else to sell.
Joy " why did our customers not protest I know I would have for something I hold in high esteem."

You don't see Joy give up on her losing causes So why the fuck should we.
 
Reactions: martcov, Deleted member 5849, skybluetony176 and 7 others

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #453
cloughie said:
that's why this wanker has no credibity in anything he spouts
Click to expand...

Is credibity a vegetable?
 

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #454
chiefdave said:
So why the hell are we having protests to raise awareness then? And if not to raise awareness, which is the usual reason given, what are the aims of the protest. Was anyone from SISU there yesterday, do you think they will even hear about what happens and if they do what difference will it make?
Click to expand...
It makes a difference because the media hear about it and it raises the issues which the FL the FA and Sisu would not like to be aired. The Government at the moment are taking an interest in football governance. If all CCFC fans sit on their hands and do nothing then the parties mentioned above would be quite pleased. I haven't noticed( but may have missed it) any negative reaction to the Blackpool pitch invasion a couple of years ago. Most things I read and saw seemed to be positive about them. I may have got this wrong and just caught a glimpse on MOTD last night, but did their fans disrupt a cup tie at Blackburn by throwing tennis balls on the pitch? If they did then fair play to them. The issue of who owns football clubs needs to be investigated and sorted out by the authorities so that the issues at so many clubs do not happen in the future, so that all of this hurt and pain that so many feel won't be repeated.
I can take sliding down the leagues, I can take crap football. What I find hard to take is this long slow strangulation of our club by people who don't care.
Once they go then the damage they have caused can start to be repaired and an outbreak of hope can happen. Until they go I hope the protests continue and that our fans make as much metaphorical noise as they can so that the FA FL Sisu and Fisher know we haven't gone away.
 
Reactions: letsallsingtogether, Captain Dart, Astute and 1 other person

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2017
  • #455
Grendel said:
Is credibity a vegetable?
Click to expand...
you are very close to that, but I'm still waiting for the I-player evidence that you lied about
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • …
  • 21
Next
First Prev 13 of 21 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?