I knew we'd lose when (1 Viewer)

speedie87 · Feb 28, 2016

At which point yesterday did you think we ain't going to win today.

For me it's when we won a corner , cole strolled across to take it and the players just left the ball in the area.

No urgency at all

Terry Gibson's perm · Feb 28, 2016

When we didn't score in the first half an hour.

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · Feb 28, 2016

When I put City to win in my accumulator for possibly the first time ever.

Otis · Feb 28, 2016

I feared it. We looked good for the first 15 mins or so and if we had scored then it would have been a different game entirely.

ceetee · Feb 28, 2016

I thought that first15 min or so domination flattered us because even then Fleetwood got closer to creating scoring chances than we did. I thought they might steal a result but in the end they deserved it.

North York’s Blue · Feb 28, 2016

I_Saw_Shaw_Score said:
When I put City to win in my accumulator for possibly the first time ever.

had a seven team accy, only one team let me down......

rightumpty · Feb 28, 2016

I'm afraid today was a case of TM being out thought by SP.

Nick · Feb 28, 2016

rightumpty said:
I'm afraid today was a case of TM being out thought by SP.

Yesterday...

Otis · Feb 28, 2016

Nick said:
Yesterday...

Yep. Two days running, which is doubly bad.

rupert_bear · Feb 28, 2016

Simply when I saw no change in tactic after half time I feared the worse. The one up top is simply not working if anyone out there thinks it is please say, it's as clear as the nose on your face it isn't. Okay last time out we hit 6 but in way it was a strange one off sort of match, early goals, certainly dodgy goalkeeping from Bury all helped.

Otis · Feb 28, 2016

No, agree! One up top isn't working. Teams are crowding Armstrong out for the most part.

I see on MOTD they were talking about Southampton's three at the back system working really well. That would obviously then give you an extra option further up the field.

Is that something worth considering?

Off the top of my head

RCC

Stephens, Cargill /Martin, Stokes

Rose Fleck Vincelot Cole Murphy

Madison/Henderson/Tudgay

Armstrong

Not saying go with it, but could it work?

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · Feb 28, 2016

Otis said:
No, agree! One up top isn't working. Teams are crowding Armstrong out for the most part.

I see on MOTD they were talking about Southampton's three at the back system working really well. That would obviously then give you an extra option further up the field.

Is that something worth considering?

Off the top of my head

RCC

Stephens, Cargill /Martin, Stokes

Rose Fleck Vincelot Cole Murphy

Madison/Henderson/Tudgay

Armstrong

Not saying go with it, but could it work?

If we can't win with 14 players we don't deserve to go up!

Otis · Feb 28, 2016

Knew some barsteward would ignore my slashes!!

I now feel like OJ Simpson.

stupot07 · Feb 28, 2016

Otis said:
No, agree! One up top isn't working. Teams are crowding Armstrong out for the most part.

I see on MOTD they were talking about Southampton's three at the back system working really well. That would obviously then give you an extra option further up the field.

Is that something worth considering?

Off the top of my head

RCC

Stephens, Cargill /Martin, Stokes

Rose Fleck Vincelot Cole Murphy

Madison/Henderson/Tudgay

Armstrong

Not saying go with it, but could it work?

3 at the back is a very difficult system to play, I remember when Wigan switched to it under Martinez and that was integral for them go on a great run which secured their survival. Martinez said that the team had been practicing it for 3 months before he implemented on a matchday - he said is a specialist system, which is difficult to learn and play.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

Otis · Feb 28, 2016

stupot07 said:
3 at the back is a very difficult system to play, I remember when Wigan switched to it under Martinez and that was integral for them go on a great run which secured their survival. Martinez said that the team had been practicing it for 3 months before he implemented on a matchday - he said is a specialist system, which is difficult to learn and play.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

Ahh, but hasn't Mowbray been saying we have other systems up our sleeves because we need to adapt our game from time to time?

stupot07 · Feb 28, 2016

Otis said:
Ahh, but hasn't Mowbray been saying we have other systems up our sleeves because we need to adapt our game from time to time?

He must have deep sleeves, either that or he's lost that jacket as he hasn't reached for them yet....

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

I knew we'd lose when (1 Viewer)

speedie87

Well-Known Member

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member

I_Saw_Shaw_Score

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

ceetee

Well-Known Member

North York’s Blue

Well-Known Member

rightumpty

New Member

Nick

Administrator

Otis

Well-Known Member

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

I_Saw_Shaw_Score

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

stupot07

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

stupot07

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

I knew we'd lose when (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency