Grendel
Well-Known Member
Indeed it's why chris wilder became our manager
" No smoke without fire "
Indeed it's why chris wilder became our manager
Deserved for what? Pointing out that his conclusion is without fact? Look back in this thread. It's Grendel dishing out the insults and high-handedness. Yet when he's challenged, it's the same faces chipping in, 'liking' and accusing people of the very behaviour Grendel starts. Do you all have lunch together?
Deserved for what? Pointing out that his conclusion is without fact? Look back in this thread. It's Grendel dishing out the insults and high-handedness. Yet when he's challenged, it's the same faces chipping in, 'liking' and accusing people of the very behaviour Grendel starts. Do you all have lunch together?
You must realise by now MMM that the SISU Loyalists are a tightly knit handful who will defend each other and the owners regardless of all others including the football club and fellow fans.
Deserved for this kind of divisive shit:
''What I do note, though, is many of the people who are counting this story as a nothing story, are those who normally take a more than sympathetic line to the current club's owner's politic. For obvious reasons''
I'm divisive? You absolute joker. That comment comes after this lot from Grendel on this thread alone......
I think if we want some comedy moments we should dredge out your threads hero worshiping the fat lazy loser that fooled you into believing he was a football manager
Or
What does that say about you? You certainly seem to want them hanging around for a long time. I guess it's just an act - are you related to fisher by any chance?
Or
I fail to see those remarks as being personal. He was fat. He was definitely lazy. He was certainly a loser
Or
Remember last time round some idiots wanted bobby Gould, the only clown who ran thorn close, back in charge
You're right, they're all respectful and designed to bring about fan unity :sarcasm:
Saying Andy thorn was shit isn't divisive - it just embarrasses the tiny handful that stood with him to the grim end - like you and Don.
What you said was divisive as it suggests some wierd agenda. The truth is the "agenda" is from people who want to make up rubbish to create instability in the club.
So one of the rules of being a sisu loyalist is to stand by an article in the local rag when it clearly has no foundation at all.
What rot.
Being divisive is to constantly and regularly misrepresent people to marginalise them in the way you have again above. Again, my view on Thorn was pretty much as articulated here two years ago:
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...ity-s-failure/page2?highlight=fisher+charlton
Stood with him? I think not
So you like me identified thorn as a dud in September 2011 and demanded his sacking then? Odd I seem to recall you staunchly defending him - I will have a look what you said at the time.
Okay. I'll wait. I can guarantee you'll find nothing as retrospectively embarrassing as the ones you posted abut the 'great job' Fisher was doing....
Like that tweet.this morning? How did that turn out.
I agree with spider_ricoh. Thorn was building a good side, his signings were not shite like Pressley's and he was treated appallingly.
Well if Pressley did go to another club he'd be only the second manager to be headhunter in 60 years so on that basis he'd certainly be a successful in that aspect of recruitment.
Frankly this is irrelevant though. You accused me of being divisive and Samo "a joker" for declaring thorn was crap. He was crap - that's not divisive. Your tone and manner, however, was.
No. Nothing like it. That was acknowledged as confusion, wasn't it?
As opposed to the story running at the same time as Sky Bet had our manager down as joint favourite for a job. That's not confusion, is it? That's reporting events.
Grendel claims that he's only favourite due to the Telegraph's reporting, which he can't substantiate, but when you follow his twisted logic - that local reporting influences betting odds - can't answer why the steadfast refusal he heard on CWR this morning hasn't ruled Pressley out. If one Telegraph article can be the only factor in his ascension, why can't a correspondingly damning ruling-out of his chances have the reverse influence?
Apart from that, your comparison holds water totally. Thanks for the input
Very little money is going on this sort of bet. The CET article will have influenced people to bet on it. They will not have listened to cwr as they more than likely live in Yorkshire and even if they did can't get their money back.
The fact you've mustered this arbitrary distinction so that your flawed logic still makes sense to you is worrying.....
Looks like he will be out of the running tomorrow.
http://www.examiner.co.uk/sport/football/who-huddersfield-towns-next-manager-7590385
You must realise by now MMM that the SISU Loyalists are a tightly knit handful who will defend each other and the owners regardless of all others including the football club and fellow fans.
For some reason i actually trust Pressley when he talks of being here for the long term project. Mind you i trusted Robins when he said the club was in his blood.
Looks like he will be out of the running tomorrow.
http://www.examiner.co.uk/sport/football/who-huddersfield-towns-next-manager-7590385
Tbf the market is so open and pressley at 2-1 or 3-1 doesn't exactly say it's a sure thing does it.
Huddersfield don't know yet and looking at the other candidates there is better and they are free agents as it were .
Its tomorrow and he is still favourite ?
Next Permanent Manager
Steven Pressley 11/10 Neil Lennon 4/1 Billy Davies 7/1 Jackie Mcnamara 14/1
Malky Mackay 16/1 Brian McDermott 16/1 Neil Warnock 16/1 Tony Mowbray 16/1
Mark Lillis 16/1 Owen Coyle 16/1 Tim Sherwood 16/1 Brian Laws 20/1
Steve Thompson 20/1 Chris Hughton 20/1 Simon Grayson 22/1 Andy Booth 25/1
Karl Robinson 25/1 Sean O'Driscoll 25/1 Graeme Jones 25/1 Dave Jones 25/1
Stuart McCall 25/1 Dean Gorre 25/1 Russell Slade 25/1 Terry Butcher 25/1
Steve Eyre 25/1 Darren Ferguson 25/1 Alan Curbishley 33/1 Gary Megson 33/1
Terry Connor 50/1 Paul Jewell 50/1 Dale Tempest 250/1
OK, it means nothing I know, but here are the latest odds..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?