Huddersfield will want someone who can come in and work under their conditions, Pressley isn't that type of manager.
No thanks..
#TheresOnlyOneStephenPressley
That doesn't make a lot of sense but essentially my whole point is you engineer an acceptable solution that will give sisu a potential exit strategy.
Oddly your stance of make them pay for everything and see them suffer will ensure they hang around longer.
What does that say about you?
You certainly seem to want them hanging around for a long time.
I guess it's just an act - are you related to fisher by any chance?
The CT's article regarding Huddersfield is designed to attract attention and from the state of some of the posts on this thread I would say it's worked..
By the way Grendel is right, Chris Wilder, Paul Ince and Dennis Wise are managers who were heavily linked yet never appointed..
Huddersfield will want someone who can come in and work under their conditions, Pressley isn't that type of manager.
If Huddersfield do come in for SP, any chance of them taking Grendel on a free as part of the deal?
Genuinely not arsed. I like Pressley but there's nothing to suggest someone else can't come in and do better/worse/the same. It is what it is.
If they want him there's a good chance he'll go.
Genuinely not arsed. I like Pressley but there's nothing to suggest someone else can't come in and do better/worse/the same. It is what it is.
If they want him there's a good chance he'll go.
Why not? He's worked under SISU's conditions compliantly enough...
While Stephen Pressley hasn't had the best conditions to work in, Steven Pressley has been able to change the ethos of the Club and has been allowed to change things to a manner of which he see's fit.
It's not nitpicking. You're mocking the Telegraph for fabricating or embellishing the story as it's without foundation; I'm telling you that as he's favourite in the betting - as you mention in your first post - it is with foundation. Our manager is favourite for a vacant role. That's news worthy in the sports section, surely?
Very much the same but Robbins has got a decent budget and players. James Vaughan and Joe Murphy on the bench. Good team really they have.
Hmmm, see who was bottom of the(very long) list at 50/1 to take over after Robins left?
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...anager-already-running?highlight=chris+wilder
What I do note, though, is many of the people who are counting this story as a nothing story, are those who normally take a more than sympathetic line to the current club's owner's politic. For obvious reasons
What difference does that make? If you care to look back, I haven't commented in any way as to whether he's liable to get the or or not. Why? As I haven't got a clue. The Telegraph story? Again, I haven't got a clue.
But it does irritate when folk claim to have the power of dismissal over the Telegraph story's origin, or Pressley's chances of going as they - like I - haven't got the foggiest. Some times the favourite gets the job. Sometimes a rank outsider gets the job. It's a lottery.
What I do note, though, is many of the people who are counting this story as a nothing story, are those who normally take a more than sympathetic line to the current club's owner's politic. For obvious reasons
What a load of fucking toss.
Sports reporter from cwr said that he spoke to a couple of sources close to Pressley, including one at Falkirk that are adamant there is nothing in it whatsoever.
He also went on to point out bookies odds are crazy on this sort of thing as all it takes is a totally unfounded story from the telegraph to get someone to put money on him and he is instantly favourite - as I have already pointed out.
The article has no substance at all.
Again, you're asserting that it was the Telegraph story that made the odds shorten. You don't know. I don't know.
Why bother pretending you know something you don't? Why don't you just do what I, and others are doing, and waiting to see before spouting your 'wisdom'?
It seems you have misunderstood.
This was a statement by Dan Freeman, sports journalist on cwr.
No. I understand. You have a view from another party that supports your stance. That's great. You may well be right. For the sake of your own desperate ego, I prey you are.
But to come back to my initial point; at the point you were dismissing categorically as 'fact' and even now with your new information, you don't 'know'. So, why not just wait and see if it's got any legs or not before taking such a firm stance. As it only takes one phone call to Pressley from the Huddersfield chairman to potentially prove you wrong
You have a point next time I see a newspaper headline that says Elvis is alive and in a double decker bus on the the moon I will wait to see if it has legs before I judge if it is made up dross or not.
You have a point next time I see a newspaper headline that says Elvis is alive and in a double decker bus on the the moon I will wait to see if it has legs before I judge if it is made up dross or not.
No your wrong Grendel Elvis stopped driving buses years ago, he now works down the chip shop in Sewall highway...
A slightly facetious response. I just checked the odds. And using The Gospel According to Grendel, I presumed - that as you claimed -one local story in the paper had made him favourite; would be countered by him tumbling back down by the news and dismissals on CWR this morning. That's how your logic works, yes?
Alas, he's still joint-favourite at 2:1 on Sky Bet. Oh. Your logic appears flawed. Damn....
http://www.thesackrace.com/teams/huddersfield-town
Again, to reiterate as I'll no doubt be misrepresented some time soon; I don't know if he will be their next manager or not. I simply and really don't know
Even though I was the OP on this one I never gave or give it much credence.
My view is that Huddersfield would be barmy to take SP when some fairly decent managers with proven track records like Neil Lennon and Brian McDermott are out of contract and available.
As far as I am concerned, its just a bit of fun & nonsense, if anyone over reacted, that is their problem.
I'd say it was deeply sarcastic and much deserved.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?