Roughly the Stats that have just led to Robins going.
Billy Davies, Neil warnock, Chris houghton, Neil lennon, Brian McDermott?
Or Stephen pressley in a current run of 4 wins in 24. No I don't see it at all.
Billy Davies seems to have come from nowhere to 2/1. To sack a manager after one game i suspect someone has already been sounded out about the job.
Is this the prick that called him 'kid' several times?
Yes, but believe it or not Samo, he's a good bloke - supported City (and followed them everywhere) - for years!
Billy Davies, Neil warnock, Chris houghton, Neil lennon, Brian McDermott?
Or Stephen pressley in a current run of 4 wins in 24. No I don't see it at all.
Is this the prick that called him 'kid' several times?
Steven Pressley, Dave Jones, Alex Ferguson, Jose Mourinho, it wouldn't make a scrap of difference.
He'll get no support from the owners, minimal funds and be expected to attract players to play at Sixfields.
The position must surely be the least attractive in English football.
4-1 joint favourite with the bookies
CT's thinking:
Ah huddlesfield need a new manager...ok, where did they get the last one from?...oh, yes it was mark Robbins poached from Coventry....interesting, hmmm well they probably like Coventry managers then, so they 'could' look to poach Pressley...
robins last 22 games w5 d4 lost 13
pressley last 22 games w4 d4 lost 14
Thought Robins was the messiah who inherited to worst side that man could have inherited and somehow worked a miracle ( comedy comments by some on here )
Thought Robins was the messiah who inherited to worst side that man could have inherited and somehow worked a miracle ( comedy comments by some on here )
Thought Robins was the messiah who inherited to worst side that man could have inherited and somehow worked a miracle ( comedy comments by some on here )
I think if we want some comedy moments we should dredge out your threads hero worshiping the fat lazy loser that fooled you into believing he was a football manager.
Funny that he has been on many threads in the last few days tried to get the answers he wants to hear?Then when he doesn't he ether derails the thread or stays away very funny and sad really.Surely; even you must be getting bored of dragging up the Thorn issue every time you're losing a debate, no?
At the third time of asking ,why do you feel the need to attack Thorn personally rather than his football managerial skills( or lack of ). As someone said on here not long ago , tone it down a bit mate!I think if we want some comedy moments we should dredge out your threads hero worshiping the fat lazy loser that fooled you into believing he was a football manager.
Funny that he has been on many threads in the last few days tried to get the answers he wants to hear?Then when he doesn't he ether derails the thread or stays away very funny and sad really.
But makes my day seeing him running around loke an idiot something to read while at the pool.
Surely; even you must be getting bored of dragging up the Thorn issue every time you're losing a debate, no?
At the third time of asking ,why do you feel the need to attack Thorn personally rather than his football managerial skills( or lack of ). As someone said on here not long ago , tone it down a bit mate!
I'll take your word for it. He sounded a lot like Booby Gould actually. Wasn't helpful though.
I think you'll find it was Don who started it. Of course you showed poor judgement there as well. What argument have I lost - rather like thorn I am right about this and you, sadly, have again been proved wrong.
That doesn't make a lot of sense but essentially my whole point is you engineer an acceptable solution that will give sisu a potential exit strategy.
Oddly your stance of make them pay for everything and see them suffer will ensure they hang around longer.
What does that say about you?
You certainly seem to want them hanging around for a long time.
I guess it's just an act - are you related to fisher by any chance?
No he's not related to Fisher and therefore by definition nor am I,because if we were we would have knocked some sense into him by now. You on the other hand are quite happy to see them around and agree with all of their actions what does that say about you?
Your last two posts make no sense. In one you're saying it's good he's the bookies favourite; and in the next claim that the Telegraph's article is based on nothing but conjecture and guesswork.
Wouldn't they be right to pose the question given his status in the betting you elude to in your first post?!?
I say you encourage the other side to make the asset as strong as possible so alternate buyers may be encouraged.
Ah typical MMM picking apart posts....
No, not really. Betting odds for next manager rarely correlates to what happens especially so early...otherwise, we'd have had Wise, Ince, Wilder or Brown instead of Robbins and Pressley.
For all we know, the CT could have come first and that caused a fluctuation in betting bringing his odds down.
It seems to me that the link to the huddlesfield article, doesn't seem to suggest Pressley is a firm favourite.
Me thinks your picking for picking sake.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?