Astute
Well-Known Member
Just because I don't spend all my time defending SISU and trying to have a go at CCC all the time like yourself?
Of course he's defending ccc when doesn't he?
Just because I don't spend all my time defending SISU and trying to have a go at CCC all the time like yourself?
What! Is this true? London Midland have had 5 years to find a solution and haven't!
From a SISU employee? Surely it's only half full at best?
I've never defended sisu but have made numerous posts criticising them.
I suspect you will not be able to find one post where you have challenged the council on anything.
No! How about when you said SISU should win the appeal but they wont?
You never did explain how you come to that conclusion. I can only presume that you think that the british justice system is corrupt and will somehow ignore the evidence presented to them and rule against SISU regardless or the Judge/Judges procieding over the appeal are not qualified to make the correct ruling on the appeal. Unlike yourself it seems, Judge Grendull has spoken.
Or is it just a case of you defending SISU?
Sounds like the latter to me.
Will we even be at the Ricoh in 2017?
We could always hire that train that takes you from Stourbridge Junction into Stourbridge.
I would post a picture, but uploading pictures never seems to work on this site using an iPad.
I suspect the Council didn't tell LM or Wasps.
Everybody knew years ago that it was in 2 phases and the second phase in 2017 includes electrification removing the need to turn around the train.
The new news is that the station will now be closed after the match as they must fear that first 75 fans on is dangerous.
Storm in a tea cup, but also cannon fodder for council haters.
Everybody knew years ago that it was in 2 phases and the second phase in 2017 includes electrification removing the need to turn around the train.
The new news is that the station will now be closed after the match as they must fear that first 75 fans on is dangerous.
Storm in a tea cup, but also cannon fodder for council haters.
Everybody knew years ago that it was in 2 phases and the second phase in 2017 includes electrification removing the need to turn around the train.
The new news is that the station will now be closed after the match as they must fear that first 75 fans on is dangerous.
Storm in a tea cup, but also cannon fodder for council haters.
Everybody knew years ago
Clearly they didn't or it wouldn't have come as such a surprise to the vast majority of people.
The CT covered it in 2013.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/ne...aited-coventry-nuneaton-rail-line-hit-6436201
A year later though it's one train every 15 minutes on match days.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/work-new-coventry-railway-station-7888550
So is it now the fault of the CET?
So is it now the fault of the CET?
It's neither the fault of the CT or the council.
The CT can be criticised for their lack of journalistic rigour. The council for their naivety and courting of PR opportunities. Or perhaps it was just blissful ignorance on the part of Lucas.
It's neither the fault of the CT or the council.
The CT can be criticised for their lack of journalistic rigour. The council for their naivety and courting of PR opportunities. Or perhaps it was just blissful ignorance on the part of Lucas.
It does, however, seem that wasps are somewhat annoyed by this. It's seems reasonable to suggest that the PR spin the council displayed in public also formed part of their USP regarding the stadium to a London based team.
They definitely were well aware this would not be available to supporters at its opening (and indeed may never) and also clearly fed items to the local media suggesting the opposite.
So all of a sudden you're concerned for Wasps. This must be a difficult dilemma for you. Praise the council for pissing of Wasps or use the wasps to have a go at the council.
Too small I think. Capacity is only 30-35 and not even sure if it would be allowed near the West Coast Mainline
I'd be more concerned about the long term plan for the station if we had a long term agreement with WASPs to use the stadium. After all, we'll be gone in a couple of years, won't we?
Next year if wasps believe they will be financially better off without us.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?