Personally I am prepared to let them continue. They seem to be doing things right.
Hope I'm wrong but I think that the possibility of any takeover is dead in the water for another 12 months.
Yes respect! How about a Go Wasps!!! Ricketts?Brave
Maybe they've realised that if it is a good investment for someone else, then it is also a good investment for them.
The best way to get a good return on thier investment is to run the club properly. With the appointment of Mark Robins they seem to be doing this.
If there had been a new owner in March and they had appointed Robins and things had happened as they have been we would all be singing from the rooftops.
Personally I am prepared to let them continue. They seem to be doing things right.
My God, very brave.Brave
I'd snap my own hand off for that to be right. 12 months is nothing.
While we're on recruitment, ok we have signed players but if the ones offered new contracts don't stay , effectively that would mean £0 investment.What's being done right? Only thing I can see looking better is recruitment and it's not down to them.
Heavy night on the gear last night?
Maybe CCFC is used as a tax loss vehicle?
While we're on recruitment, ok we have signed players but if the ones offered new contracts don't stay , effectively that would mean £0 investment.
You would need someone from HMRC to answer that one.How does that work? People keep saying that but don't explain it.
While we're on recruitment, ok we have signed players but if the ones offered new contracts don't stay , effectively that would mean £0 investment.
Maybe CCFC is used as a tax loss vehicle?
By an offshore fund - very likely.
What's being done right? Only thing I can see looking better is recruitment and it's not down to them.
Heavy night on the gear last night?
Which is a good point. Yes last years squad got us relegated but the signings we have made it's not exactly like we swooped in and signed them ahead of any teams in higher leagues than us or any of the teams that you'd expect to be pushing for promotion and playoff places from league two next season. On the face of it they may seem like good signings and we're ahead of the game but we're yet to see who's leaving, who they were actually replacements for an which direction those players move.
Like you also point out when compared to transfer fees received there may have been no investment what so ever. It's more likely that the Wembley windfall has given MR some tools to start early than SISU giving him the tools to do the job.
Maybe CCFC is used as a tax loss vehicle?
How does it work?
An offshore fund? Well first, it's a fund - so the profits don't even belong to SISU, they belong to the owners of the fund. SISU only profits from fees, which are probably a percentage of the value of the fund. And secondly, because it's offshore, they don't pay tax anyway.
I meant the tax loss stuff
You said very likely, but then your other reply says its not!
Put a wink, I realised when I saw your 2nd replyYou need a sarcasm emoji.
The only time that a tax loss makes sense IMO (and Old Sky Blue may know others) is when you lose money (and you never want to do that) you recognise it in the P/L immediately. So for example, if I have to buy a machine for £100 which has 5 years of use in it, the fair way to account would be to charge £20 to P/L every year. But if I wanted to cook the books I would put the £100 to P/L immediately as I buy it. That's not legal in the UK.
Put a wink, I realised when I saw your 2nd reply
Yeah, but that's not very 'dry' is it? Honestly, I thought the proposition so absurd that it would be obvious - not having a go.
You say that on a website where somebody thought Tim Fisher engineered the checkatrade win...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?