Agree with all the above.
Question is, what happens next. Does Duckenfield stand trial? Do his superiors stand trial for orchestrating the cover up?
A rightful verdict, but sadly this was Football Policing in the 80's, poorly run, little training and poepl like Duckenfield who wasnt up to the task in charge.
Aside from the fact Duckenfiled and those above were incompetent, the FA are complicit in allowing the game to be at a stadium that wasnt up to it, whilst the Government who guide the Police a lot on what they should be doing, were obvioulsy happy to sit back and let Football Policing continue in that fashion without thought for the consequences.
This is more than about one mans ill judged actions, (although his controlling over the whole situation led to such tragic events) there should be thought into why wasnt he properly trained, where was the contingency planning, why wasnt the operation better planned etc, this goes well over and above Duckenfield to both the top echelons of South Yorkshire Police, the FA and the Home Office.
Noble firms like Liverpool themselves you mean Macca? The ones who stopped City having a European adventure in 87 due to Heysel? They don't seem to be banging on about justice for Heysel though.
Incidentally how many (if any) of the fans were jailed for Heysel? According to what I could find only 14 of the 27 were convicted and at least half of those only suspended sentences.
I'm not sure what relevance this has. They were tried and sentenced. If you're intimating that the sentences weren't severe enough I'd tend to agree but that is an issue for the Belgium justice system.
The Heysel victims families weren't lied to by the authorities, they weren't victims of a state cover up for 27 years which is what this is all about.
I reiterate, this could have happened to any clubs supporters and the response of the government, the police and the red tops would have been the same.
I don't want to get embroiled in this but I have to ask - do you think the end was overcrowded and if so why?
I imagine the first thought of everyone that day was that it was kicking off. Certainly what I thought at the time, so frequent was it. I can understand the mistakes made if not the cover up
A rightful verdict, but sadly this was Football Policing in the 80's, poorly run, little training and poepl like Duckenfield who wasnt up to the task in charge.
Aside from the fact Duckenfiled and those above were incompetent, the FA are complicit in allowing the game to be at a stadium that wasnt up to it, whilst the Government who guide the Police a lot on what they should be doing, were obvioulsy happy to sit back and let Football Policing continue in that fashion without thought for the consequences.
This is more than about one mans ill judged actions, (although his controlling over the whole situation led to such tragic events) there should be thought into why wasnt he properly trained, where was the contingency planning, why wasnt the operation better planned etc, this goes well over and above Duckenfield to both the top echelons of South Yorkshire Police, the FA and the Home Office.
Can you lawfully kill someone in the UK?
What about the bitch that had the fences built? does she have to carry any of the blame,also the people who died at Bradford. All this because of her hatred for the working classes. Hope she rots in hell.
What came first, hooliganism or fences?
"i for one do not want to see anyone , in their 70's , get put in jail, what would be the point right?"
I tend to agree. Duckenfield was out of his depth but his superiors shouldn't have put him in that position, (the semi final was the first event he supervised at Hillsborough which is madness as it was the biggest that year).
I might feel different if I was a victims family member though.
However, he should face charges for the massive cover up after the event knowing that he opened the gate - it was not broken down by supporters.
What about the bitch that had the fences built? does she have to carry any of the blame,also the people who died at Bradford. All this because of her hatred for the working classes. Hope she rots in hell.
Correct.....He fucking knew full well he dropped a massive bollock immediately, but instead of trying to rectify it, re-arrange the ample man-power he had at his disposal etc. & actually try & save some fucking lives, He chose the lying cowards way out & instantly spoke to the press, while fans were still dying, blaming those fans for forcing a gate......
He was not just incompetent & grossly negligent.....he was a devious lying cowardly c**t & should face the full weight of the law....hopefully resulting in a prison term....preferably in HMP Walton.
Justice for 96!
my take
worst thing that could happen to all parties happened to all parties
people losing lives
badly designed statia
inexperience in policing and government task forces
police covering each others backs , equally supporters blinding the truths of their own past actions
this was the culmination of years and years of unease in football, nobody really knew what would happen next, and nobody really came out of this smelling of roses,
if my dad had been a policeman back then, im sure he would have been taking orders and been very scared, the man or men at the top were only doing what they thought would help, the pressure was there to see and disaster struck
i for one do not want to see anyone , in their 70's , get put in jail, what would be the point right?
families should be rewarded through criminal payouts, and a line should be drawn under it snd we can all pray it doesnt happen anywhere again
i for one do not want to see anyone , in their 70's , get put in jail, what would be the point right?
I think the fact that He's lied and covered up evidence is disgusting and he should be prosecuted for this and not for the deaths of the fans that died.
The disaster itself was was a perfect storm scenario with a poorly designed ground, thousands piling in late and poor coordination from the police. No one knew what would unfold when the gates were opened. I'm fairly sure that had the gates not been opened then people would have been crushed outside the ground or at best a riot ensuing and so the office in charge probably did so with the best intentions.
Mistakes were made and steps taken to prevent it happening again. It was different times and I really can't see how modern logic and attitudes being applied to stuff that took place a long time ago is going to help.Time to move on now I think.
the inquest didnt prove this
equally it couldnt prove anyone was drunk
they had to deal in facts, and the fact is, the police opened the gates, and thats why theyre blamed
there are 2 private investigations thats covering the cover ups, but these will never be resolved imo because of nil proof
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?