into injury time now, are we going to get a last minute winner ?
Just as an aside, given that top QC's can charge up to £5000 per hour I reckon that SISU's legal costs for 3 days will be several multiples of £29,000 by now.
Along with people praying for things etc.
It does get more interest than a match thread / video of highlights thread. Sadly.
into injury time now, are we going to get a last minute winner ?
Given that there is ample evidence that suggests the club acted with zero financial controls previouy if say it would be very easy to argue that was the case in a courtroom. We had an embargo when we did not pay for ward at Bolton - was she aware of that - probably - did she have to approve non payment - unlikely, I'm sure there will be minutes of a board meeting that will reveal the extent of her involvement.
That's not what she said, she said that it was a club decision and not something that sisu had approved.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I'm sorry Nick to again remind you this is of a consequence far greater than any given match; and will attract a level of interest proportional to an event that could shape the very existence of our club.
Your continued bewilderment in that regard, is on par with that of most Sixfields apologists, I'm afraid to observe
A charity I don't give a fuck about and the twatty owners of ccfc squabbling over £29k.
Who the fuck cares.
I'm sorry Nick to again remind you this is of a consequence far greater than any given match; and will attract a level of interest proportional to an event that could shape the very existence of our club.
Your continued bewilderment in that regard, is on par with that of most Sixfields apologists, I'm afraid to observe
A charity I don't give a fuck about and the twatty owners of ccfc squabbling over £29k.
Who the fuck cares.
A charity I don't give a fuck about and the twatty owners of ccfc squabbling over £29k.
Who the fuck cares.
Don't we have her level of involevement in her below statement ?
“What I can say definitively is that since I’ve become involved in the last two years I have not regretted any of the decisions that we’ve made."
i would perhaps suggest your in the wrong place then
I have not noticed any evidence been put forward in the form of documents. All seems a bit he said she said.
True but lets be honest if the case was kicked out there would be meltdown. Bent judges, threatened witnesses - it would be hilarious.
Looks like the start of melt down on your side of the fence to be honest.
Oh fuck off with your patronising dictionary swallowing shite. I mean even pre Sixfields.
I'm sorry Nick to again remind you this is of a consequence far greater than any given match; and will attract a level of interest proportional to an event that could shape the very existence of our club.
Your continued bewilderment in that regard, is on par with that of most Sixfields apologists, I'm afraid to observe
Ah I see so when you said "owners" you meant every single shareholder one of whom was my dad, not Richardson et al.
Im sure you were aware of that, but you'd rather take it another way. That's up to you.
I am afraid to observe, you are the most condescending prat I've ever had the misfortune to come across on this forum.
I'm sorry Nick to again remind you this is of a consequence far greater than any given match; and will attract a level of interest proportional to an event that could shape the very existence of our club.
Your continued bewilderment in that regard, is on par with that of most Sixfields apologists, I'm afraid to observe
I think both sides were allowed to submitt documentation prior to the trial and it may be publically available when it's all finished.
Means nothing. The legal definition stands - minutes of meetings would have to be observed.
Sixfields Apologists? What sad child you are.
Ah I see so when you said "owners" you meant every single shareholder one of whom was my dad, not Richardson et al.
Im sure you were aware of that, but you'd rather take it another way. That's up to you.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
The thing is, there only seems to be one side of the fence. Has anybody been on here posting how they pray to god SISU win this etc etc?
The saddest are the folk who have awaited the 'smoking gun', and all this council subterfuge to come out in court, who have had a taster of it in the last few days, and still refuse to see what's right in font of them; and still have no shame, and will happily trot along using the limp disguise of 'supporting the lads'. You're not supporting the lads, you're supporting the actions of those who are killing the club - but are too selfish to see past that clear fact
He tries to hard with his queens English - he reminds me of chris Eubank - he's probably an insecure prick who has to develop this persona over a keyboard.
The saddest are the folk who have awaited the 'smoking gun', and all this council subterfuge to come out in court, who have had a taster of it in the last few days, and still refuse to see what's right in font of them; and still have no shame, and will happily trot along using the limp disguise of 'supporting the lads'. You're not supporting the lads, you're supporting the actions of those who are killing the club - but are too selfish to see past that clear fact
well, the right side of the fence will soon be confirmed by the judge !
Incidentally, what is the point of posting on a thread to say "wot a borin thread"?
Oh fuck off with your patronising dictionary swallowing shite. I mean even pre Sixfields.
Maybe you follow law cases like this closely as you know more about them then football?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?