oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
He is a Trustee of the Charity Nick
Is Harris an advisor for the Higgs?
Finally the truth people..... Sisu backed down from the agree 5.5m which is a steal anyway and offered 2m hence it fell apart.
Case solved. They are wankers. Deserve everything they get now.
There was no deal though only HOT's ....... hadn't done the due diligence so there couldn't be a final price could there?
question - if they only continued funding the club because they wanted the Charity share why are they still "funding it"?
Isn't Ms Deering an employee? In which case what authority for decision making does she have? What authority does she have for issuing funding or negotiating? - no t having a go would just like to know because I understood JS made all the major decisions
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert44 secsMs Deering confirms Sisu thought charity's share was worth nothing.
Ms Deering confirms Sisu thought charity's share was worth nothing.
Deering says she doesn't know details of discussion between Harris & Seppala
Are they the same as advisors? (genuine question)
If yes, then it is a massive contradiction.
They probably thought 5.5m is a steal but lets see where we can push them and offer 2m and meet somewhere like 3.5/4m saving another slice again. They should of realised 5.5m was the best deal ever and should of taken it and now because higgs told them to do one they have missed their chance and getting sore about it and want the 5.5m deal again.
All finally comes out in the end. They are horrible cretinous wankers. Its like buying a car and getting the deal you want and is a low price and then seeing if the dealer will take another 300 quid off and he says you know what forget it and then you go ok lets do the original but he would either say ok or be pissed off and tell you to do one. The latter is whats happened here and a lack of trust and animosity has developed. Rightly so
All solved peeps
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert48sHiggs barrister asks if Sisu were seriously going to pay £5.5m for share worth nothing. Deering says Seppala recognised Higgs were a charity
Or it's called commercial negotiations, Higgs were or are under no obligation to sell at either price, albeit were then put under pressure due to the rent strike.
sorry but ....... :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert19sIt seems it may have been useful if Ms Seppala was here to answer some of these questions.
no Nick they are like the directors of a company. Trustees are the Charity equivalent
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert9sMiss Deering says offer for charity's share was considerably less than agreed in original discussions due to 'increased risk' to Sisu.
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert31sMr Harris previously claimed original deal was £5.5m for charity's share. New deal around £2million.
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert44 secsMs Deering confirms Sisu thought charity's share was worth nothing.
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert19sIt seems it may have been useful if Ms Seppala was here to answer some of these questions.
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert48sHiggs barrister asks if Sisu were seriously going to pay £5.5m for share worth nothing. Deering says Seppala recognised Higgs were a charity
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert48sHiggs barrister asks if Sisu were seriously going to pay £5.5m for share worth nothing. Deering says Seppala recognised Higgs were a charity
Simon Gilbert@TheSimonGilbert48sHiggs barrister asks if Sisu were seriously going to pay £5.5m for share worth nothing. Deering says Seppala recognised Higgs were a charity
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?